⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “(PC) Garrett v. Baker”

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011-09-22 · Published · cited 7× · 657 F.3d 80; 2011 WL 4390053
657 F.3d 80 (2011) Andrew ZIMMERMANN, as Class Representative for the Certified Zimmermann Action Classes, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. EPSTEIN BECKER AND GREEN, P.C., et al., Defendants, Appellees. Andrew Zimmermann, as Class Representative for the Certified Zimmermann Action Classes, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. BDO Seidman, LLP, et al., Defendants, Appellees. Nos. 10-2174, 10-2275.
Wyoming Supreme Court · 1987-05-14 · Published · cited 16× · 737 P.2d 323; 1987 Wyo. LEXIS 444
737 P.2d 323 (1987) MARIANO & ASSOCIATES, P.C., a Wyoming professional corporation, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF the COUNTY OF SUBLETTE, State of Wyoming, Appellee (Defendant). No. 86-206. Supreme Court of Wyoming. May 14, 1987. William H. Twichell and Gerald R. Mason of Mason & Twichell, P.C., Pinedale, for appellant. Jo
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2020-02-26 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any FILED court except for the purpose of establishing Feb 26 2020, 9:36 am the defense of res judicata, collateral CLERK Indiana Supreme Court estoppel, or
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018-06-18 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Jun 18 2018, 10:35 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019-05-15 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be May 15 2019, 9:02 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019-05-30 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any May 30 2019, 8:18 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK the defense of res judicata, collateral Indiana Supreme Court
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019-03-12 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be FILED regarded as precedent or cited before any Mar 12 2019, 9:33 am court except for the purpose of establishing CCLERK LERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res j
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019-04-16 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), Apr 16 2019, 9:16 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK Indiana Supreme Court court except for
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2024-04-12 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE Court of Appeals of Indiana Kevin Hamilton, FILED Appellant-Defendant Apr 12 2024, 8:46 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court v.
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018-12-12 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any FILED court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral Dec 12 2018, 10:48 am estoppel, or the law of the case. CLERK Indiana Supreme Court
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019-04-09 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Apr 09 2019, 8:50 am regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK Indiana Supreme Court court except for the purpose of establishing
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019-12-19 · Published · cited 0×
FILED Dec 19 2019, 9:28 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018-05-14 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any May 14 2018, 11:03 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2019-06-24 · Published · cited 0×
06/24/2019 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs at Knoxville April 23, 2019 JOHN WILLIE STONE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Bedford County No. 18042-PC Franklin Lee Russell, Judge No. M2018-01214-CCA-R3
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018-11-16 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any Nov 16 2018, 9:04 am court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral Court of Appeals
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016-09-09 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Sep 09 2016, 7:51 am Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this CLERK Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals precedent or cited before any court except for the
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018-10-30 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Oct 30 2018, 5:30 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018-03-28 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Mar 28 2018, 6:05 am regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court the defense of res judicata, collateral Court of A
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2015-11-30 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), Nov 30 2015, 8:06 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. APPELLANT PRO SE ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Michael Hunt Gregory F. Zoeller Carlisle, Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016-05-20 · Published · cited 0×
MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), May 20 2016, 10:07 am this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any CLERK Indiana Supreme Court court except for the purpose of establishing