Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “(PC) Smith v. Sacramento Sheriff”
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ESTATE OF CLEMENTE NAJERA No. 23-55718 AGUIRRE; J.S.; A.S.; Y.S., D.C. No. 5:18-cv- Plaintiffs-Appellees, 00762-DMG-SP v. OPINION COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE; DAN PONDER, Defendants-Appellants. Appeal from the Uni
Clemmons v. City of Long Beachpublic domain
MEMORANDUM* The County of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles County Sheriffs Department (col*488lectively, the Sheriff) appeal the district court’s denial of their motion for summary judgment based upon their claim of governmental immunity under California law. We reverse and remand. Jerome Leslie Clemmons brought this action
Douglas Echols v. Spencer Lawtonpublic domain
WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge: This appeal requires us to decide whether a district attorney enjoys qualified immunity from a complaint that he defamed a former prisoner in retaliation for seeking legislative compensation for his wrongful convictions. After Douglas Echols served seven years of imprisonment for kidnapping and rape, a test revealed that his DNA did not match the semen recovered from the victim. Echols presented this ev
Welchen v. Cnty. of Sacramentopublic domain
Troy L. Nunley, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendant County of Sacramento, ("County") Defendant Scott Jones, in his official capacity as Sacramento County Sheriff, ("Sheriff") and Defendant Kamala Harris's, in her official capacity as the California Attorney General, ("AG") (collectively "Defendants") Motions to Dismiss. (ECF No. 35; ECF No. 36.) Plaintiff Gary Wayne Welchen, et al. ("Pl
Oszust v. Town of St. Johnpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER JON E. DEGUILIO, United States District Judge In this case, police officer David Oszust alleges that the Town of St. John, Indiana (the Town) retaliated against him for engaging in activity protected by Title VII. Further, he alleges that the Town’s Metropolitan Board of Police Commissioners (the Board) commenced disciplinary proceedings against him that do not comply with Indiana Code §
Winder v. McMahonpublic domain
GAIL J. STANDISH, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The three remaining defendants in this case, the County of San Bernardino and *1198Deputies Bustamante and Ortiz, move for summary judgment as to all of plaintiff Richard Winder's claims. (Motion for Summary Judgment ("Mtn.") [Dkt. 32].) Defendants move for summary judgment on the basis, i
Koessel v. Sublette County Sheriff's Departmentpublic domain
TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge. Kevin Koessel was terminated from his position as a deputy sheriff in Sublette County, Wyoming, due to concerns about the lingering effects of a stroke he suffered. In response, Koessel brought a suit in district court against the Sheriff and the County alleging they violated the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), breached his employment contract, and
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA VENTURA COUNTY EMPLOYEES’ RETIREMENT ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. CRIMINAL JUSTICE ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION OF VENTURA COUNTY et al., Defendants and Appellants. S283978 Second Appellate District, Division Six B325277 Santa Barbara County Superior Cour
Glenn v. Washington Countypublic domain
ORDER The panel acknowledges the amended table of contents in Appellees’ corrected petition for rehearing, filed November 21, 2011. Appellees’ motion for leave to file a corrected petition for rehearing is DENIED. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35. Appellees’ petition
State v. Henrypublic domain
176 Ariz. 569 (1993) 863 P.2d 861 STATE of Arizona, Appellee, v. Graham Saunders HENRY, Appellant. No. CR-88-0123-AP/PC. Supreme Court of Arizona. November 12, 1993. *573 Grant Woods, Atty. Gen. by Paul J. McMurdie, Chief Counsel, Criminal Appeals Section, R. Wayne Ford, Asst. Atty. Gen., Phoenix, for appe
Hoa v. Rileypublic domain
ORDER GRANTING CROSS-DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS (Docket No. 146) EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge David F. Lopez, T. Gregory Stagnito, Bridge Transport, and Stag Leasing Inc. (collectively “Cross-Defendants”) have moved to dismiss Richard Riley, Raymond Matteucci, David Moore, Ronald Chan, Tammy Foss, Thomas Alioto, and George Moon’s (collectively “Cross-Claimants”) cross-complaint
Lapachet v. Cal. Forensic Med. Grp., Inc.public domain
Dale A. Drozd, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the court on defendants' motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 51.) On December 19, 2017, a hearing on the motion was held. Attorneys Teresa Allen, Michael Haddad, and Sanjay Schmidt appeared telephonically on behalf of plaintiff Jeremy Lapachet. Attorneys Jemma Saunders, Jesse M. Rivera, and Jill Nathan appeared telephonically on behalf of defendants. Having reviewed the part
Lucas v. Shivelypublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION MICHAEL F. URBANSKI, District Judge. This matter is before the court on the summary judgment motions of defendants Patrick Lamb (“Lamb”) and Gary L. Shively (“Shively”). Dkt. Nos. 37 & 38, respectively. Both defendants assert that qualified immunity bars this civil rights action. The court heard oral argument on these motions on April 25, 2014. Dkt. No. 60. At that time,
Alexander v. CITY OF MUSCLE SHOALS, ALA.public domain
766 F.Supp.2d 1214 (2011) Stephen ALEXANDER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MUSCLE SHOALS, ALABAMA; Robert Evans; Eddie Lang; Tommy Skipworth; Charles Sockwell; Chris Brown; Ashley Jones; Jonathon Terry; Joe Pampinto; Neal Willis; Jerry "Knight" Holland; and Allen Noles, Defendants. Civil Action No. CV-09-S-1396-NW. United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, Northwestern Division. Janu
Castaneda v. City of Albuquerquepublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT C. BRACK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Including Qualified Immunity) and Memorandum of Law in Support filed on August 14, 2015 (Doc. 62), and Plaintiff Paul Castaneda’s Motion for Partial Summary *1158Judgment on Count.I of His Compla
Jackson ex rel. Jackson v. Suffolk Countypublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: On June 3, 2011, the East End Drug Task Force (the “Task Force”), including defendant Police Officer Kenneth D. Ric-hert (“Richert”), executed a search warrant at 115 Broad Street, Greenport, New York, the residence (at that time) of plaintiff Julie Jackson (“Jackson”); her son, plaintiff Elijah Jackson (“Elijah”) (collec
Snyder v. Smithpublic domain
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS SARAH EVANS BARKER, District Judge. This cause is before the Court on motions to dismiss filed by three groups of defendants. Defendants Caira Bolden and Christina Bolen filed their Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim [Docket No. 46] on August 23, 2013. Defendants Jason Albaugh, Troy Bacon, Robert Hession, Chris McBarnes, the Frankfort Police De
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARTHA VÁZQUEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the DOH Defendants’1 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Claims Under the Medicaid Act and Supporting Memorandum (“Motion to Dismiss Medicaid Act Claims”) [Doc. 215], the DOH Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Rehabilitation Act and Americans With Disabilitie
Knife Rights, Inc. v. Bontapublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT KNIFE RIGHTS, INC.; ELIOT No. 24-5536 KAAGAN; JIM MILLER; D.C. No. GARRISON HAM; NORTH 3:23-cv-00474- COUNTY SHOOTING CENTER, JES-DDL INC.; PWGG, LP, Plaintiffs - Appellants, OPIN
Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Milasinovichpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Defendant Melanie Milasinovich’s Exigent Amended Notice for Removal and Objection to the State Court Hearing, filed July 23, 2015 (Doc. 4)(“Seeond Amended Notice of Removal”); (ii) Plaintiff Federal National Mortgage Association’s Motion to Strike or Remand and for Award of Addit