⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “(PC) Williams v. County of Sacramento”

Wyoming Supreme Court · 1987-05-14 · Published · cited 16× · 737 P.2d 323; 1987 Wyo. LEXIS 444
737 P.2d 323 (1987) MARIANO & ASSOCIATES, P.C., a Wyoming professional corporation, Appellant (Plaintiff), v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF the COUNTY OF SUBLETTE, State of Wyoming, Appellee (Defendant). No. 86-206. Supreme Court of Wyoming. May 14, 1987. William H. Twichell and Gerald R. Mason of Mason & Twichell, P.C., Pinedale, for appellant. Jo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-04-28 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN No. 21-70282 FRANCISCO, Environmental Petitioner, Protection Agency v. ORDER U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent. On Remand from the United States Supreme Court Filed April 28, 202
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2008-01-29 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 23, 2007 ANTHONY DARRELL HINES v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Cheatham County No. 9852 Robert E. Burch, Judge No. M2006-02447-CCA-R3-PC - Filed January 29, 2008 A Cheatham County jury convicted the Petitioner, Anthony Darrell
Supreme Court of Colorado · 2015-06-29 · Published · cited 20× · 2015 CO 50; 351 P.3d 461; 2015 Colo. LEXIS 589; 2015 WL 3948220
Colorado Supreme Court Opinions || June 29, 2015 Colorado Supreme Court -- June 29, 2015 2015 CO 50. No. 13SC233. Taxpayers for Public Education v. Douglas County School District. The Supreme Court of the State of Colorado 2 East 14th Avenue • Denver, Colorado 80203 2015 CO 50
California Court of Appeal · 2020-06-01 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 6/1/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT ALEKSANDR KON, B290929 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC583851) v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents. APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los A
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025-03-20 · Published · cited 0×
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0065p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ JEFFREY FRANZ, et al. (23-1483/1563); STEVE ST. │ JULIANA, et al. (23-
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-03-13 · Published · cited 0× · 131 F.4th 798
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-35440 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:22-cv- 00329-BLW v. STATE OF IDAHO, ORDER Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-35450 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 1:22-cv- 00329-BLW v. STATE OF IDAHO
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025-09-02 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 24-1216 Doc: 39 Filed: 09/02/2025 Pg: 1 of 14 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1216 JUSTYNA JENSEN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. MARYLAND CANNABIS ADMINISTRATION; WILLIAM TILBURG,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-07-18 · Published · cited 2× · 40 F.4th 930
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT TULELAKE IRRIGATION No. 20-35515 DISTRICT; KLAMATH WATER USERS ASSOCIATION; TALLY D.C. Nos. HO FARMS PARTNERSHIP, 1:17-cv-00069-CL DBA Walker Brothers; FOUR 1:17-cv-00098-CL H ORGANICS, LLC; 1:17-cv-00468-CL WOODHOUSE FARMING AND 1:17-cv-00531-CL SEED COMPANY; TULELAKE GROWERS ASSOCIATION, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011-07-26 · Published · cited 177× · 652 F.3d 1225; 80 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 142; 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 15309; 2011 WL 3077266
652 F.3d 1225 (2011) Robert E. HUNTER, D.V.M.; Howard Eley, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; Sheriff's Department, County of Sacramento; Lou Blanas, Sheriff; Office of the District Attorney, County of Sacramento; Jan Scully; William Kevin Sowles; John McGinness, Sheriff; Defendants-Appellees. No. 09-15288. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-04-25 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHICKEN RANCH RANCHERIA No. 21-15751 OF ME-WUK INDIANS; CHEMEHUEVI INDIAN TRIBE; D.C. No. BLUE LAKE RANCHERIA; 1:19-cv-00024- HOPLAND BAND OF POMO AWI-SKO INDIANS; ROBINSON RANCHERIA, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA; GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of California, Defendants-Appe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-04-25 · Published · cited 5× · 65 F.4th 1145
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHICKEN RANCH RANCHERIA No. 21-15751 OF ME-WUK INDIANS; CHEMEHUEVI INDIAN TRIBE; D.C. No. BLUE LAKE RANCHERIA; 1:19-cv-00024- HOPLAND BAND OF POMO AWI-SKO INDIANS; ROBINSON RANCHERIA, Plaintiffs-Appellees, OPINION v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA; GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor of California, Defendants-Appe
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018-03-07 · Published · cited 214× · 884 F.3d 1093
ED CARNES, Chief Judge: A Selma Police officer shot and killed Ananias Shaw, who was coming toward him with a hatchet. Shaw's estate brought 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims for excessive force and false arrest and state law tort claims against Officer Desmond Willia
District Court, E.D. California · 2018-11-13 · Published · cited 0× · 351 F. Supp. 3d 1301
JOHN A. MENDEZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Anthony Marc Mostajo and Elaine Quedens ("Plaintiffs") bring class claims against Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company ("Defendant" or "Nationwide"), their former employer, for Nationwide's alleged failure to pay overtime and unused but accrued vacation time to claims adjusters in California. Second Am. Compl., ECF No. 23. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgme
District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2011-02-09 · Published · cited 0× · 781 F. Supp. 2d 783; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13193; 2011 WL 588626
781 F.Supp.2d 783 (2011) Sung PARK, Plaintiff, v. INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY, et al., Defendants. Cause No. 1:10-cv-1408-WTL-WGH. United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division. February 9, 2011. *784 S. Andrew Burns, Cox Sargeant & Burns PC, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiff. Cory Stephen
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021-06-11 · Published · cited 9× · 1 F.4th 191
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 20-1584 MITCH RANDALL YAWN; JUANITA MAE STANLEY, d/b/a Flowertown Bee Farm and Supplies, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. DORCHESTER COUNTY, Defendant - Appellee and TOWN OF SUMMERVILLE; ALLEN AVIATION, INC.; AL ALLEN, Defe
Sealed 1 v. Farberpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007-01-09 · Published · cited 8× · 212 F. App'x 42
SUMMARY ORDER Defendant-appellant William Farber, Chief of Police of the Village of St. Johns-ville, appeals from the August 9, 2005 decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York (Hurd, J.), denying his motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity grounds. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and the procedural history of this case. Rev
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018-03-07 · Published · cited 1× · 884 F.3d 838
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LONNIE CRAIG No. 16-16001 PATTERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:12-cv-01350-MCE-CKD v. CITY OF YUBA CITY, ORDER CERTIFYING Defendant-Appellee. QUESTION TO THE CALIFORNIA SUPREME
Coleman v. Brownpublic domain
District Court, E.D. California · 2014-04-10 · Published · cited 25× · 28 F. Supp. 3d 1068; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50878; 2014 WL 1400964
ORDER LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge. In ongoing sequelae to defendants’ January 7; 2013 motion to terminate this action (hereafter “termination motion”) (ECF No. 4275), two additional motions brought by plaintiffs for enforcement of court orders and affirmative relief are before the court.1 On May 9, 2013, plaintiffs filed a motion related to housing and treat<
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018-08-27 · Published · cited 6× · 336 F. Supp. 3d 511
WENDY BEETLESTONE, District Judge. "The Court has consistently held that some kind of hearing is required at some time before a person is finally deprived of his property interests." Wolff v. McDonnell , 418 U.S. 539, 557-58,