Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
11 opinions for “(PS)Grill v. State of California Civil Rights Department”
Saleemi v. Doctor's Associates, Inc.public domain
Chambers, J.* ¶1 Doctor’s Associates Inc. (DAI), a Florida corporation, franchises Subway sandwich shops across the country. Waqas Saleemi and Farooq Sharyar operated three Subway franchises in Washington State. Their franchise agreements provided that any disputes would be arbitrated in Bridgeport, Connecticut, under Connecticut law, except for Connecticut franchise law. After a dispute arose, a Wash
Kaur v. City of Lodipublic domain
ORDER Troy L. Nunley, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendants City of Lodi (“Lodi”), City of Lodi Police Department (“LPD”) and Mark Helms’s (“Chief Helms”) Motion for Summary Adjudication (ECF No. 163) and Defendants Miles Scott Bratton (“Corporal Bratton”) and Adam Lockie’s (“Officer Lockie”) Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the alternative, Summary Adjudication (ECF
Duncan v. Becerrapublic domain
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DECLARING CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE § 32310 UNCONSTITUTIONAL and ENJOINING ENFORCEMENT HON. ROGER T. BENITEZ, United States District Judge *1134Individual liberty and freedom are not outmoded concepts. "The judiciary is - and is often the only - protector of individual right
Perez v. Koreskopublic domain
MEMORANDUM McLAUGHLIN, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Procedural History. .300 A. Administrative Enforcement Proceedings.300 B. Initial Complaint .301 C. Motion for Summary Judgment. 302 D. Supplemental Complaint.303 E. Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injuncti
Corso v. Corsopublic domain
BROSKY, P. J., Plaintiff, Helen Cor-so, filed an action in divorce from bed and board against Anthony C. Corso for the reason that defendant has offered such indignities to the person of plaintiff as to render her condition intolerable and life burdensome. On May 2, 1972, the court allowed plaintiff to file the following amendment: “Plaintiff further avers that in violation of his marriage vow and of the laws
Swinerton Builders Northwestpublic domain
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of-- ) ) Swinerton Builders Northwest ) . ASBCA No. 57329 ) Under Contract No. NAF26-04-C-0025 ) APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT: Durward E. Timmons, Esq. Milton L. Smith, Esq.
Banks v. Boothpublic domain
ATTACHMENT B Case 1:20-cv-00849-CKK Document 138 Filed 12/12/20 Page 1 of 51 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA EDWARD BANKS, ef al., Plaintiffs, Vv. No. 1:20-cv-849 (CKK) QUINCY BOOTH, in his official capacity as Director of the District of Columbia Department of Corrections, ef al., Defendants. REPORT SUBMITTED BY AMICUS CURIAE PURSUANT TO SEPTEMBER 16, 2020 ORDER (Table of Contents, Report Narrative, Index to Exhibits, Appendix A Exhibits 1A — 6 and Appe
ACCEPTED 05-15-00161-CV 05-15-00161-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 2/9/2015 3:21:23 PM NO.
in Re: Michelin North America, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 05-15-01480-CV 05-15-01480-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12/4/2015 2:42:24 PM
East Texas Medical Center Gilmer v. Birder Porterpublic domain
ACCEPTED 12-14-00220-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 9/4/2015 3:01:53 PM
ACCEPTED 03-14-00735-CV 4703327 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS