Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “154 Mott Corp”
Barnhart v. Peabody Coal Co.public domain
537 U.S. 149 (2003) BARNHART, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY v. PEABODY COAL CO. ET AL. No. 01-705. Supreme Court of United States. Argued October 8, 2002. Decided January 15, 2003.[*] CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. *150 *151
28 Mott St. Co. v. Summit Import Corp.public domain
Allen Murray Myers, J. This is a holdover proceeding to recover commercial premises. The petition alleges that: “ the tenant * * * entered into possession of the premises under an oral rental agreement made on or about the 1st day of September 1963 * * * for the term of one month and continued therein under the terms of the original .agreement, the last month commencing on the 1st day of November 1968 and ending on the 1st day
Wilson v. C.C. Southern, Inc.public domain
140 S.W.3d 115 (2004) Mary Joyce WILSON, Brian Keith Wilson, John David Wilson, and April Wilson, Respondents-Appellants, v. C.C. SOUTHERN, INC., Appellant-Respondent, and Central Transport International, Inc., Nancy Farmer, Robert Kerr, and Kerr Cartage Company, Inc., Respondents. No. WD 62805. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. May 18, 2004. Mot
Praxair, Inc. v. ATMI, Inc.public domain
OPINION SUE L. ROBINSON, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION 1. The court tried the single issue of inequitable conduct in a bench trial on December 12, 2005. The court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1338(a) and 2201(a). Having considered the documentary evidence and testimony, the court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Fed.
Mendillo v. Prudential Insurance Co. of Americapublic domain
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Victor A. Bolden, United States District Judge Plaintiff, Lisa Mendillo, brought this action against her former employer, The Prudential Insurance Company of America (“Prudential” or “Defendant”), asserting claims for violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (the “ADEA”), the Americans with Disabilities Act (the “ADA”), the Family Medical Leave Act (the “FML
ACCEPTED 01-15-00346-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS
Erdely v. Estate of Airdaypublic domain
Erdely v Estate of Airday (2023 NY Slip Op 01827) Erdely v Estate of Airday 2023 NY Slip Op 01827 Decided on April 6, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431
Erdely v. Estate of Airdaypublic domain
Erdely v Estate of Airday (2023 NY Slip Op 01827) Erdely v Estate of Airday 2023 NY Slip Op 01827 Decided on April 6, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431
Egan Jr., J. Appeals (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Mott, J.), entered July 1, 2013 in Albany County, which, among other things, partially granted petitioners’ application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondents partially denying petitioners’ Freedom of Information Law request, and (2) from a judgment of said court, entered
Matter of CREDA, LLC v City of Kingston Planning Bd. (2023 NY Slip Op 00355) Matter of CREDA, LLC v City of Kingston Planning Bd. 2023 NY Slip Op 00355 Decided on January 26, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York S
Matter of 2-4 Kieffer Lane LLC v. County of Ulsterpublic domain
Matter of 2-4 Kieffer Lane LLC v County of Ulster (2019 NY Slip Op 03722) Matter of 2-4 Kieffer Lane LLC v County of Ulster 2019 NY Slip Op 03722 Decided on May 9, 2019 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by
People v. Flowerspublic domain
People v Flowers (2018 NY Slip Op 07562) People v Flowers 2018 NY Slip Op 07562 Decided on November 9, 2018 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary La
Streit v. Katrine Apts. Assoc., Inc.public domain
Streit v Katrine Apts. Assoc., Inc. (2023 NY Slip Op 00135) Streit v Katrine Apts. Assoc., Inc. 2023 NY Slip Op 00135 Decided on January 12, 2023 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant
Noble v. Village of Elliottpublic domain
ORDER After his car was towed from in front of his home, Robert Noble brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against the Village of Elliott, Mayor Tracy Mott, Wyatt’s Collision and Repair, Ford County, and Ford County Sheriffs Lieutenant Curtis Miller (collectively, “the Village Defendants”). He alleged violations of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments and state law trespass. After the district court denied Noble’s motion to exclude evi
True Homespublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA23-48 Filed 6 February 2024 Guilford County, No. 19 CVS 3879 TRUE HOMES, LLC and D.R. HORTON, INC., on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF GREENSBORO, Defendant. Appeal by defendant from order entered 24 August 2022 by Judge Richard L. Doughton in Guilford County Superior Court. Heard in the Court o
Parker v. U.S. Trust Company N.A.public domain
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS Nos. 18-CV-1349 and 19-CV-1225 NANCY B. PARKER and ELLIS J. PARKER, APPELLANTS/CROSS-APPELLEES, v. U.S. TRUS
Hoaglin v. Duke Univ. Health Sys.public domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA23-546 Filed 7 May 2024 Durham County, No. 18 CVS 3093 MICHAEL C. HOAGLIN, M.D., Plaintiff, v. DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. d/b/a DUKE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL and JOSHUA SETH BRODER, M.D., Defendants. Appeal by Plaintiff from order entered 27 October 2022 by Judge Michael J. O’Foghludha in Durham County Superior Court. Heard in the Court
Brennan-Centrella v. Ritz-Craft Corp. of Pa.public domain
18‐729‐cv(L) Brennan‐Centrella v. Ritz‐Craft Corp. of Pa. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ____________________ August Term, 2018 (Argued: April 15, 2019 Decided: November 5, 2019) Docket Nos. 18‐729‐cv(L), 18‐867‐cv(XAP) ____________________ MARY BRENNAN‐CENTRELLA, CARMINE C
Untitled California Attorney General Opinionpublic domain
TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL State of California ROB BONTA Attorney General _________________________ : OPINION : No. 21-201
Reagan v. Brisseypublic domain
Perretta, J. This appeal brings before us the question whether *155the Land Court judge erred in concluding that the plaintiffs do not hold an implied easement to use as parldands four parcels of land, to which the town of Oak Bluffs (town) holds tax title, subject to the individual defendants’ unforeclosed right of redemption. The plaintiffs also sought to permanently en