⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “323 SOUTH 7TH LLC”

Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2022-08-02 · Published · cited 10× · 344 Conn. 150
WIND COLEBROOK SOUTH, LLC v. TOWN OF COLEBROOK (SC 20594) Robinson, C. J., and D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn and Ecker, Js. Syllabus Pursuant to statute (§ 12-64 (a)), the following property, if not exempted, shall be taxed as real property: ‘‘Dwelling houses, garages, barns, sheds, stores, shops, mills, buildings used for business, commercial, financial, manufacturing, mercantile and trading purposes,
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2025-10-07 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-2448 AMY HADLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF SOUTH BEND, INDIANA, et al., Defendants-Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2026-05-21 · Published · cited 0×
USCA11 Case: 24-13713 Document: 41-1 Date Filed: 05/21/2026 Page: 1 of 21 FOR PUBLICATION In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 24-13713 ____________________ T-MOBILE SOUTH, LLC,
Supreme Court of Florida · 2014-05-22 · Published · cited 16× · 139 So. 3d 869; 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 345; 2014 WL 2118101; 2014 Fla. LEXIS 1672
LABARGA, J. This case is before the Court for review of the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in RLI Live Oak, LLC v. South Florida Water Management District, 99 So.3d 560 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012). The South Florida Water Management District subsequently filed a motion for certification, which the Fifth District granted, certifying the following questio
District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010-03-11 · Published · cited 4× · 693 F. Supp. 2d 792; 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23362
693 F.Supp.2d 792 (2010) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. 786 SOUTH LLC, and Tripoli II, Inc., Defendants. No. 2:07-cv-02621-JPM-tmp. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee, Western Division. March 11, 2010. *793 Carson L. Owen, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Memphis, TN, William A. Cash, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2024-03-05 · Published · cited 6× · 95 F.4th 152
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1043 Doc: 80 Filed: 03/08/2022 Pg: 1 of 25 Certiorari granted by Supreme Court, June 20, 2023 Vacated and remanded by Supreme Court, June 20, 2023 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2012-12-06 · Published · cited 0× · 912 F. Supp. 2d 1273; 90 Fed. R. Serv. 1; 2012 WL 6186012; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 172861
MEMORANDUM OPINION HARWELL G. DAVIS, III, United States Magistrate Judge. On December 11, 2009, plaintiff Jeffery A. Clark, III, (“Clark”) an African-American, initiated this civil action with a two-count complaint filed in the Northern District of Alabama against defendant APAC Mid-South, Inc., (“APAC”) alleging race discrimination and retaliation in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (“Section 1981”
District Court, D. Delaware · 2014-04-30 · Published · cited 2× · 36 F. Supp. 3d 475; 2014 WL 1788161; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 67111
MEMORANDUM OPINION STARK, U.S. District Judge: Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Avanir Holding Company, and Center for Neuro-logic Study (“CNS”) (collectively, “Avanir” or “Plaintiffs”) allege that Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., and Impax Laboratories, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) infringe United States Patent Nos. RE38,115 (“the 115 patent”), 7,659,282 (“the ’282 p
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022-03-08 · Published · cited 1× · 27 F.4th 945
PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1043 PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC; JULIE EDWARDS, on her behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs – Appellees, v. ROBERT M. KERR, in his official capacity as Director, South Carolina Department of Health and Human Services,
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010-04-16 · Published · cited 0× · 427 B.R. 439; 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 1007; 53 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 20; 2010 WL 1541373
427 B.R. 439 (2010) In re 1518 WEST CHICAGO AVENUE, LLC, Debtor. 1518 West Chicago Avenue, LLC, Plaintiff, v. South Melrose, LLC, and Harris Bank, N.A., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 09 B 05776. Adversary No. 09 A 00542. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. April 16, 2010. *440 Christina M. Riepel, Gr
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022-03-08 · Published · cited 0×
USCA4 Appeal: 21-1043 Doc: 80 Filed: 03/08/2022 Pg: 1 of 25 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1043 PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTH ATLANTIC; JULIE EDWARDS, on her behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs – A
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019-05-07 · Published · cited 12× · 208 A.3d 539
OPINION BY JUDGE BROBSON Great Real Estate, LLC (Owner) appeals 1 from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County (common pleas), dated September 6, 2017. Common pleas reversed the decision of the Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Philadelphia (Board), which granted Owner's applicati
Idaho Supreme Court · 2026-01-06 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO Docket No. 52313 EDWARD STASIEWICZ and BARBARA ) STASIEWICZ, husband and wife, ) ) Plaintiffs-Appellants, ) ) and ) ) THE SOUTH HENRY’S LAKE OUTLET ) HOMEOW
SEC v. BC57, LLCpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-05-07 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1870 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, and KEVIN B. DUFF, Receiver, et al., Appellees, v. EQUITYBUILD, INC., et al.,
SEC v. BC57, LLCpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-05-07 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1870 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, and KEVIN B. DUFF, Receiver, et al., Appellees, v. EQUITYBUILD, INC., et al.,
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006-02-02 · Published · cited 4× · 436 F.3d 1197; 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 2570; 2006 WL 246475
McCONNELL, Circuit Judge. This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment in an insurance dispute founded on diversity jurisdiction. We affirm. * Background Nautilus Insurance Company sued Greg Bayouth, Deana Hastings, and its insured, 8160
SEC v. BC57, LLCpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-05-06 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1870 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, and KEVIN B. DUFF, Receiver, et al., Appellees, v. EQUITYBUILD, INC., et al.,
SEC v. BC57, LLCpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024-05-06 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 23-1870 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, and KEVIN B. DUFF, Receiver, et al., Appellees, v. EQUITYBUILD, INC., et al.,
Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2011-07-19 · Published · cited 31× · 336 Wis. 2d 267; 2011 WI 81; 800 N.W.2d 880
DAVID T. PROSSER, J. ¶ 1. This is a review of a published decision of the court of appeals, Casper v. American International South Insurance Co., 2010 WI App 2, 323 Wis. 2d 80, 779 N.W.2d 444,1 affirming three orders of the Milwaukee County Circuit Court, Christopher R. Foley, Judge. The case arises out of a tragic *276accident that o
District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2017-03-26 · Published · cited 0× · 244 F. Supp. 3d 810; 2017 WL 1133665; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 44136
OPINION AND ORDER Robert L. Miller, Jr., Judge Linda Brown sued Biomet for damages in connection with the alleged failure of her Biomet hip implant. Biomet moved for summary judgment, arguing that all of her claims are time-barred by the applicable statutes of limitations based on (1) a proposed date on which all plaintiffs were on constructive notice of potential claims and (2) facts specific to Ms. Brown.