Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “532 Beach LLC”
In Re Miami Beach Hotel Investors LLCpublic domain
304 B.R. 532 (2004) In re MIAMI BEACH HOTEL INVESTORS LLC, Debtor. No. 03-41340-BKC-AJC. United States District Court, S.D. Florida, Miami-Dade Division. January 22, 2004. *533 Francis Carter, Ferrell, Schultz, Carter, Zumpano & Fertel, Miami, FL, for Miami Beach Hotel Investors LLC. John B. Hutton, Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Mi
420 Tenants Corp. v. EBM Long Beach, LLCpublic domain
*225OPINION OF THE COURT Thomas P. Phelan, J. Application by petitioner 420 Tenants Corp. to vacate the decision of the Building Commissioner of the City of Long Beach granting building permit No. 00A38444 to Aqua Construction Corp. or, in the alternative, to compel the Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Long Beach to provide the materials necessa
407 F.Supp.2d 1321 (2005) ASSOCIATION FOR DISABLED AMERICANS, INC., Michelle Wisnewski and Daniel Ruiz, Plaintiffs, v. KEY LARGO BAY BEACH, LLC, and Key Largo Management Corporation, d/b/a Marriott Key Largo, Defendants. Association for Disabled Americans, Inc. v. Key Largo Bay Beach, LLC. No. 04-10081CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. December 16, 200
Palm Beach Newspapers, LLC v. Statepublic domain
WARNER, J. Palm Beach Newspapers, LLC, d/b/a The Palm Beach Post, seeks certiorari review of an order prohibiting it from publishing transcripts of a jail inmate’s recorded telephone conversations. We find that the Post’s publication of the transcripts is protected by the First Amendment. We further conclude that the trial court failed to comply with Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420 in sealing court documents. W
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT KIM RENEE ROBERTS, Appellant, v. THIRD PALM, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company; and RIVIERA BEACH INVESTORS, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, Appellees. Nos. 4D19-989 and 4D19-2023
Waterwood Enterprises, LLC v. City of Long Beachpublic domain
Filed 12/18/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE WATERWOOD ENTERPRISES, B296830 LLC, (Los Angeles County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. NC060787) v. CITY OF LONG BEACH, Defendant and Respondent. APPEAL from an amended judgment of the Sup
MARCUS, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Beach TV Cable Co., Inc. d/b/a Key TV (“Key TV”), a local over-the-air broadcaster serving the Florida Keys, brought this action in federal district court against Comcast of Florida/Georgia, LLC (“Comcast”), which owns and operates a cable television system serving the same area. Pursuant to federal law, Key TV is entitled to lease access on a Com-cast channel at a reasonable rate and free
SMITH, Circuit Judge. Chavis Van & Storage of Myrtle Beach, Inc. (“Chavis”) appeals from the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment on its breach-of-contract claim against United Van Lines, LLC.; Transportation Services Group, Inc.; and Uni-Group, Inc. (collectively, “United”). Chavis also appeals the
Onwumbiko v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.public domain
PER CURIAM: Frederick Onwumbiko appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim. See Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). We agree with the district court that Onwumbiko’s claims are barred by the statute of limitations.* Accordingly, we affirm. Onwumbiko v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., No. 8:12-cv-01733-AW, 2012 WL 6019497 (D.Md. Nov. 30, 2012). We
Spanakos v. Pagepublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MARK J. SPANAKOS, § § No. 532, 2019 Petitioner Below, § Appellant, § § v. § Court Below - Court of Chancery § of the State of Delaware ROBERT PATE, JOHN R. PATE, § EDWARD SEBASTIANO, MARY § C.A. No
Allied World Nat'l Assurance Co. v. Md. Cas. Co.public domain
DARRIN P. GAYLES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *1184THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Maryland Casualty Company's ("Maryland Casualty") Motion for Summary Judgment ("Motion"). [ECF No. 133]. The Court has reviewed the Motion, the record, arguments of counsel, and is otherwise fully advised. Fo
CARLOS E. MENDOZA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court on Defendants' Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 38), to which Plaintiff filed a Response (Doc. 46). Also before the Court is Defendants' Motion for Judicial Notice (Doc. 40) and Plaintiff's Response (Doc. 45) as well as Defendants' Amended Motion for Judicial Notice (Doc. 47) and Plaintiff's Response (Doc. 48). In addition, this cause is
Williams v. United Community Bankpublic domain
STEPHENS, Judge. These appeals emanate from four cases, two of which were consolidated for trial and all four of which have been designated exceptional and assigned the secondary docket number 09 CVS 9191 for case management purposes. All of the cases arise from a scheme to develop land in the mountain community of Spruce Pine, which went badly awry. As the caption of this opinion suggests, this scheme and the resulting lega
FF Cosmetics FL, Inc. v. City of Miami Beachpublic domain
*1294 DUBINA', Circuit Judge: In this consolidated interlocutory appeal, Appellant City of Miami Beach (“City”) challenges the district court’s order granting Appellees FF Cosmetics FL Inc., Timeless Cosmetics FL Inc., Brilliance New York LLC, and Oceane FL Cosmetics Inc.’s (“Retailers”) renewed motion
Bransten v. Statepublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Carol Robinson Edmead, J. This declaratory judgment action brought by the Association of Justices of the Supreme Court of the State of New York and current and retired members of the New York State judiciary challenges the constitutionality of the decision by the State of New York (defendant) to reduce the State’s contribution to the justices’ health insurance benefits.
ORDER RE: EFFECT OF STATUTORY AMENDMENT ON CASE AGAINST CHARITABLE DEFENDANTS GREGORY F. KISHEL, CHIEF UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE These adversary proceedings are before the court on motions for dismissal made by Defendants Sabes Family Foundation (“the Sabes Foundation”) and The Minneapolis Foundation (in ADV 10-4301) and *102Defendant Northwes
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS AND ST. JOHN BEACHSIDE ASSOCIATES, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. SBRMCOA, LLC, d/b/a SAPPHIRE BEACH RESORT AND MARINA CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, Defendant. APPEARANCES Neil D. Goldman 510 King Street, Suite 416 Alexandria, VA 22314 Gregory H. Hodges Dudley, Newman and Feuerzeig, LLP 1000 Frederiksberg Gade St. Thomas, VI Attorneys for Plaintiff Maria Tankenson Hodge, Esq. Hodge & Hodge 1340 Taarneberg St. Thomas, VI Attorn
United Natural Foods, Inc. v. Teamsters Local 414public domain
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 22-1469 UNITED NATURAL FOODS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. TEAMSTERS LOCAL 414, Defendant-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for
Dominion Terminal Associates v. M/V CAPE DAISYpublic domain
24 F.Supp.2d 532 (1998) DOMINION TERMINAL ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff, v. M/V CAPE DAISY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 2:98CV467. United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Norfolk Division. September 4, 1998. *533 Lee Allen Handford, McGuire, Woods, Battle & Boothe, Norfolk, VA, Carter Branham Snow Furr, McGuire, Woods,
Daystar Seller Financing LLC v. Patrick Hundleypublic domain
Per Curiam. *33 Plaintiff/counterdefendant, Daystar Seller Financing, LLC (Daystar), appeals by right an order granting summary disposition in favor of defendant/counterplaintiff/third-party plaintiff, Patrick Hundley, pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(4) for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.