⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “660 Commonwealth Avenue Operations LLC”

Montana Supreme Court · 2022-11-15 · Published · cited 5× · 520 P.3d 312; 410 Mont. 465; 2022 MT 229
11/15/2022 DA 21-0660 Case Number: DA 21-0660 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2022 MT 229 TAI TAM, LLC, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. MISSOULA COUNTY, acting by and through i
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2024-07-17 · Published · cited 0×
[J-23-2024] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT ELITE CARE, RX, LLC : No. 25 WAP 2023 : v. : Appeal from the Order of the : Superior Court entered May 23, PREMIER COMP SOLUTIONS, LLC; : 2023 at No. 1144
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024-09-09 · Published · cited 1× · 253 N.E.3d 660; 2024 Ohio 4451
[Cite as State ex rel. AWMS Water Solutions, L.L.C. v. Mertz, 2024-Ohio-4451.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TRUMBULL COUNTY STATE OF OHIO ex rel. AWMS WATER CASE NO. 2016-T-0085 SOLUTIONS, LLC, et al., Relators, Original Action for Writ of Mandamus -v- MARY MERTZ, DIRECTOR OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, et
Court of Appeals of Virginia · 2023-05-23 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Decker, Judges Huff and Callins PUBLISHED Argued at Richmond, Virginia COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF TAXATION OPINION BY v. Record No. 0598-22-2 CHIEF JUDGE MARLA GRAFF DECKER
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025-05-06 · Published · cited 8× · 136 F.4th 613
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0116p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ PUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION, │ Pl
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2017-08-03 · Published · cited 0× · 268 F. Supp. 3d 660
MEMORANDUM OPINION Matthew W. Brann, United States District Judge Á weightless innocence so often attends our daydreams of flight. As the Américan aviator John Gillespie Magee, Jr., 'loftily described it, pilots “dance[] the skies on laughter-silvered wings,” soaring “high in the sunlit silence.”1 Sadly, it wouid seem that Magee’s “high untrespassed sanctity of space” must belong
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020-01-14 · Published · cited 17× · 947 F.3d 139
PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 18-3804 _____________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. WILLIAM M. TYSON, Appellant ______________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania (D.C. No. 1-17-cr-00316-001) District Judge: Honorable
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017-07-10 · Published · cited 2× · 166 A.3d 513; 2017 WL 2913791; 2017 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 448
OPINION BY JUDGE COHN JUBELIRER Clearwater Construction, Inc. and Northampton County Bridge Partners, LLC (Clearwater, collectively) appeal from an October 3, 2016 Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Northampton County (common pleas), which found Clearwater lacked standing to challenge a contract awarded under the Public-Private Transportation Part
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018-11-13 · Published · cited 1× · 593 B.R. 381
Joan N. Feeney, United States Bankruptcy Judge I. INTRODUCTION The matter before the Court is the Motion of RREF II Kenmore Lessor II, LLC ("RREF") for Relief from Stay to Proceed with Summary Process Eviction (the "Stay Relief Motion"). RREF, a Massachusetts limited liability company and an affiliate of Related Beal, supported its Stay Relief Motion with the Affidavit of Will Grosvenor, a Director a
Massachusetts Superior Court · 2023-04-21 · Published · cited 0×
SUPERIOR COURT SZAWLOWSKI POTATO FARMS, INC., AND OTHERS [1] v. JOSEPH E. SZAWLOWSKI, AS THE SPECIAL PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF STANLEY E. SZAWLOWSKI, AND AS TRUSTEE OF THE STAN AND MARY ELLEN SZAWLOWSKI FAMILY TRUST Docket: 2180CV00021
Massachusetts Superior Court · 2024-06-04 · Published · cited 0×
SUPERIOR COURT ARCO NATIONAL HOLDINGS, INC. v. LABORERS’ INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA; MASSACHUSETTS & NORTHERN NEW ENGLAND LABORERS’ DISTRICT COUNCIL OF THE LABORERS’ INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA; LABORERS’ INTERNATIONAL UNION OF NORTH AMERICA LOCAL 22 Docket:
Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2015-11-25 · Published · cited 3× · 88 Mass. App. Ct. 654; 41 N.E.3d 54
Wolohojian, J. At issue is whether R.M. Packer Co., Inc. (Packer), was properly found liable for attorney’s fees and costs under G. L. c. 21E, § 4A(/), after it unsuccessfully sought contribution from the defendants for costs to clean up an oil spill. In three circumstances, the statute requires that reasonable attorney’s fees and costs be awarded against a plaintiff who has sued se
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013-07-25 · Published · cited 12× · 74 A.3d 1101; 2013 WL 3865107; 2013 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 283
OPINION BY Judge COHN JUBELIRER. Rochelle Shipley and John Shipley1 appeal from the Order of the Court of Common Pleas of Delaware County (trial court) that denied a Petition to Set Aside Judicial Tax Sale (Petition to Set Aside) of property located at 600 E. 9th Street, Chester, Pennsylvania (Property). The trial court held, in relevant part, that Mrs. Shipley, whose name did no
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2014-08-11 · Published · cited 4× · 515 B.R. 660; 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 3418; 2014 WL 3925509
ORDER ON CONFIRMATION OF FIRST AMENDED JOINT PLAN OF REORGANIZATION OF THE DEBTORS DATED DECEMBER 18, 2013, AS AMENDED AND THE SECOND AMENDED PLAN OF LIQUIDATION FOR EACH DEBTOR PROPOSED BY RREF BB ACQUISITIONS, LLC DATED DECEMBER 31, 2013, AS AMENDED BARBARA ELLIS-MONRO, Bankruptcy Judge. This case came before the Court for a hearing (the “Hearing”)1 on March 26, 2
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010-06-25 · Published · cited 15× · 999 A.2d 1256; 2010 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 309; 2010 WL 2541108
999 A.2d 1256 (2010) NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION, Shawn Lupka, Curtis Reese, Richard Haid and Jeffrey Armstrong, Appellants v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, Pittsburgh City Council, and Mayor Luke Ravenstahl, in his capacity as Mayor of the City of Pittsburgh. No. 2048 C.D. 2009. Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania. Argued April 20, 2010. Decided June 25, 2010.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015-07-10 · Published · cited 30× · 792 F.3d 520; 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 11888; 2015 WL 4153840
Vacated and remanded by published opinion. Judge THACKER wrote the opinion, in which Judge NIEMEYER and Judge DUNCAN joined. THACKER, Circuit Judge: In November 2012, Janet Jenkins sued Liberty University, Inc. (“Appellee”), alleging that the school participated — both directly and vicariously — in a scheme to kidnap Jenkins’s daughter in order to disrupt t
Kentucky Supreme Court · 2011-09-22 · Published · cited 17× · 349 S.W.3d 892; 2011 Ky. LEXIS 128; 2011 WL 4431130
*908NOBLE, J., dissenting: I dissent because I do not believe that a claim involving the Court of Justice, the AOC, or any judicial officers or court employees may proceed at the Board of Claims. Nevertheless, in Horn by Horn v. Commonwealth, 916 S.W.2d 173, 176 (Ky.1995), this Court held in part that the Board had jurisdiction over the Court of
Varner v. MHS, Ltd.public domain
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014-03-06 · Published · cited 4× · 2 F. Supp. 3d 584; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 28472; 2014 WL 888501
MEMORANDUM MANNION, District Judge. Pending before the court in this products liability action is the motion for summary judgment, (Doc. 20), of defendant MHS, Ltd. on plaintiffs claims for strict liability, negligence, and breach of warranty.1 For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. I. BACKGROUND
District Court, D. Maryland · 2015-09-03 · Published · cited 0× · 128 F. Supp. 3d 888; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118175
MEMORANDUM OPINION RICHARD D. BENNETT, District Judge. Plaintiff Cumberland & Erly, LLC (“C & E” or “Plaintiff’) brings this diversity action against Defendant Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (“Nationwide” or “Defendant”), seeking a declaratory judgment in its favor pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201. Essentially, C & E claims that Nationwide breached the terms of the insurance policy
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2021-10-20 · Published · cited 0×
[J-83-2020] IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT BAER, C.J., SAYLOR, TODD, DONOHUE, DOUGHERTY, WECHT, MUNDY, JJ. FIREARM OWNERS AGAINST CRIME; : No. 29 MAP 2020 KIM STOLFER; JOSHUA FIRST; AND : HOWARD BULLOCK, : Appeal from the Order of the : Commonwealth Court dated