Cases

351 F.Supp.2d 1197 (2005) Laural L. CHAN, Plaintiff, v. SPRINT CORPORATION, Defendant. No. 03-2608-GTV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. January 11, 2005. *1198 *1199 Barry R. Grissom, Michael M. Shultz, Law Firm of Michael M. Shultz, P.A., Overland Park, KS, for Plaintiff. Davi

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER BUCKLO, District Judge. Plaintiff, Cory D. Chan, alleged that defendant, Edward S. Wodnieki, removed him from his position with the Chicago Terrorist Task Force (“Task Force”) and with the Intelligence Section of the Chicago Police Department (“CPD”) for asserting his Fifth Amendment privilege before a federal grand jury on August 9, 1989.1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE January 6, 2016 Session AMY WONG CHAN v. HENRY WAH CHAN Appeal from the General Sessions Court for Blount County No. S11191 Robert L. Headrick, Judge No. E2015-00597-COA-R3-CV-FILED-APRIL 26, 2016 _________________________________ Amy Chan (Wife) and Henry Chan (Husband) were gra

Moonbeam Gateway Mar., LLC v Tai Chan (2025 NY Slip Op 03802) Moonbeam Gateway Mar., LLC v Tai Chan 2025 NY Slip Op 03802 Decided on June 25, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

7 Ariz. App. 360 (1968) 439 P.2d 523 Elma VAN ZANDT, as Trustee for the W.G. Tolleson Trust, Appellant, v. Bill CHAN and Woo Shee Chan, Appellees. No. 1 CA-CIV 469. Court of Appeals of Arizona. April 9, 1968. *361 Cox & Cox, by Alfred S. Cox, Phoenix, for appellant. James A. Yankee, Phoenix, for

Zhao v Na Chan (2018 NY Slip Op 00418) Zhao v Na Chan 2018 NY Slip Op 00418 Decided on January 24, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law §

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dianne T. Renwick, J.), entered October 4, 2004, which granted the motions and cross motions by defendants and third-party defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, third-party complaint, and all cross claims asserted against the moving parties, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Although the report of plaintiffs’ physician was adequate to *

Per Curiam. Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 2001 and was previously admitted in New Jersey in 2000. He formerly practiced law in Washington and now resides in New Jersey. By verified petition of charges sworn to June 26, 2014, petitioner alleges, in a single charge with two specifications, that respondent, among other conduct, facilitated a corporate stock transaction for a client of his

VAN GRAAFEILAND, Circuit Judge: Christopher Guilfuchi appeals from a judgment of conviction entered oh April 7,1998 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Kram, J.) following his guilty plea to possession of less than one gram of cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 844. The plea was entered pursuant to an agreement with the Government in

Per Curiam. Respondent was admitted to practice by this Court in 2001 and was previously admitted in New Jersey in 2000. He formerly practiced law in Washington and now resides in New Jersey. By verified petition of charges sworn to June 26, 2014, petitioner alleges, in a single charge with two specifications, that respondent, among other conduct, facilitated a corporate stock transaction for a client of his

LOKEN, Chief Judge. Carlos Alberto Pool-Chan was arrested with fourteen other illegal aliens traveling in a van on Interstate 80 in Cedar County, Iowa. He was carrying a bogus social security card bearing a nine-digit social security number and the name Carlos Pool. After a bench trial, Pool-Chan was convicted of possessing a counterfeit social security card in violation of 18

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 05-4015 ___________ United States of America, * * Plaintiff - Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * Distr

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, FOR PUBLICATION December 8, 2015 Plaintiff-Appellee, v No. 323642 Kent Circuit Court MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER FREDERI

123 F.3d 1287 1997 A.M.C. 2713, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7012,97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,355 Benny CHAN and; Victoria Chan, as Guardian Ad Litem ofSamantha Chan, Plaintiffs-Appellees,andAdventurer Cruises, Inc., a Liberian corporation, Claimant,v.SOCIETY EXPEDITIONS, INC., a Washington Corporation,Discoverer Reederei, GmbH, a West Germancorporation, in personam, Defendants-Appellants.

OPINION Honorable Ashely M. Chan, United States Bankruptcy Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction., .88 *88II. Facts and Procedural History...90 A. Background of High Fidelity House, Inc.... 90 1. Officers and Outside Accountant. . .90

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge: Defendants Society Expeditions (“Society”) and Discoverer Reederei GmbH (“Discoverer”) appeal the district court’s ruling that they are liable for injuries Plaintiffs Benny and Samantha Chan sustained when an inflatable raft on which they were ferried from a cruise ship to shore capsized in the South Pacific. The Chans cross-appeal the district court’s dismissal of their action in rem against the cr

WATHEN, Justice. Plaintiff Ronald Levesque appeals from an order of the Superior Court (Aroostook County, Pierson, J.) granting summary judgment in a medical malpractice action in favor of defendants, Dr. William Chan and Dr. Francis Chan. The Superior Court did not consider the medical evidence offered in opposition to defendants’ motions on the ground that plaintiff’s medical witness was not competent to express a

503 F.Supp.2d 1353 (2007) David VAN SLYKE, Franklin Chan, and Thomas E. Browning, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CAPITAL ONE BANK, Capital One Bank, Capital One Financial Corporation, and Does 1-100, inclusive, Defendant& No. C 07-00671 WHA. United States District Court, N.D. California. June 7, 2007.

Cotroneo v Van Wagner Sign Erectors, LLC (2025 NY Slip Op 06130) Cotroneo v Van Wagner Sign Erectors, LLC 2025 NY Slip Op 06130 Decided on November 06, 2025 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. </

KRAMER, Associate Judge: Ramy Elhalaby appeals from the denial of his Motion to Reduce Sentence and argues that this court should vacate his sentence and remand for re-sentencing because he was denied the right to alloeute on his own behalf at his probation revocation hearing. We review for plain error because Elhalaby did not object at the hearing. We do not find plain error, and we affirm. I. Factual Su