⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “A.F. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.”

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2024-05-02 · Published · cited 0×
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS 13-23-00597-CV Theodore Khnanisho v. Meta Platforms, Inc. f/k/a Facebook, Inc., Corpus Christi Citizen's Crime Watch, John Doe, and Jane Doe On Appeal from the 94th District Court of Nueces County, Texas Trial Court Caus
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2024-05-02 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-23-00597-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG THEODORE KHNANISHO, Appellant, v. META PLATFORMS, INC. F/K/A FACEBOOK, INC., CORPUS CHRISTI CITIZEN'S CRIME WATCH, JOHN DOE, AND JANE DOE, Appellees.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-07-25 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 04438
Patterson v Meta Platforms, Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 04438) Patterson v Meta Platforms, Inc. 2025 NY Slip Op 04438 Decided on July 25, 2025 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Lindley Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judi
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-07-25 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 04385
Patterson v Meta Platforms, Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 04385) Patterson v Meta Platforms, Inc. 2025 NY Slip Op 04385 Decided on July 25, 2025 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-02-01 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MIKE WEBB, Plaintiff, v. No. 23-cv-816 (DLF) META PLATFORMS, INC.; OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT & BUDGET, Defendants. ORDER Mike Webb, proceeding pro se, brings this action against Meta Platforms, Inc. and the Office
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-03-31 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MIKE WEBB, Plaintiff, v. No. 23-cv-00816 (DLF) OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION The plaintiff, Mike Webb, proceeding pro se, brings this action against the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”)
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025-07-25 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 NY Slip Op 04384
Salter v Meta Platforms, Inc. (2025 NY Slip Op 04384) Salter v Meta Platforms, Inc. 2025 NY Slip Op 04384 Decided on July 25, 2025 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024-03-21 · Published · cited 37× · 96 F.4th 1223
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT DZ RESERVE; CAIN MAXWELL, No. 22-15916 DBA Max Martialis, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 3:18-cv-04978-JD v. OPINION META PLATFORMS, INC., FKA Facebook, Inc., Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2024-12-10 · Published · cited 4× · 123 F.4th 592
23-763 Phhhoto Inc. v. Meta Platforms, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2023 (Argued: November 16, 2023 Decided: December 10, 2024) No. 23-763 –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– PHHHOTO INC.,
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2024-03-29 · Published · cited 0×
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT ____________ No. 24-5054 September Term, 2023 1:23-cv-03562-RDM Filed On: March 29, 2024 Meta Platforms, Inc., Appellant v. Federal Trade Commission, et al.,
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2024-12-02 · Published · cited 2× · 560 P.3d 217
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON STATE OF WASHINGTON, No. 84661-2-I Respondent, DIVISION ONE v. PUBLISHED OPINION META PLATFORMS, INC., formerly doing business as FACEBOOK, INC., Appellant. DÍAZ, J. — “[A] well-informed electorate is as vital to the su
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-03-14 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA META PLATFORMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 23-3562 (RDM) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This case has its origins in a 2011 agreement between Defendant Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or the “Co
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022-12-21 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT COLIN R. BRICKMAN, individually No. 21-16785 and on behalf of a class of similarly situated individuals, D.C. No. 3:16- cv-00751-WHO Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OPINION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Intervenor-Appellee, META PLATFORMS, INC., Defendant-App
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024-06-27 · Published · cited 5× · 105 F.4th 1179
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT PURUSHOTHAMAN RAJARAM, No. 22-16870 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:22-cv-02920-LB v. META PLATFORMS, INC., FKA OPINION Facebook, Inc., Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Laurel D. Beeler, Magis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024-06-17 · Published · cited 15× · 104 F.4th 1117
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CLAYTON P. ZELLMER, on behalf No. 22-16925 of himself and all others similarly situated, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-01880-JD Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OPINION META PLATFORMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-04-02 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-3590 (JEB) META PLATFORMS, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION In preparation for the high-stakes, national antitrust trial in this case set to begin in a matter of weeks, Plaintiff the Federal Trade
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2023-09-14 · Published · cited 0×
Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 22-CV-0239 META PLATFORMS, INC., APPELLANT, V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, A
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-11-13 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-3590 (JEB) META PLATFORMS, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION How times have changed. Not so long ago, a company called Facebook so dominated the provision of personal social-networking services that a
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024-08-09 · Published · cited 15× · 112 F.4th 742
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CHILDREN’S HEALTH DEFENSE, No. 21-16210 a Georgia non-profit organization, D.C. No. Plaintiff-Appellant, 3:20-cv-05787-SI v. META PLATFORMS, INC., a OPINION Delaware corporation; MARK ZUCKERBERG, a California resident; THE POYNTER INSTITUTE FOR MEDIA STUDIES, INC., a Florida corporation; SCIENCE F
District Court, District of Columbia · 2024-03-14 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA META PLATFORMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 23-3562 (RDM) FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION, et al, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This case has its origins in a 2011 agreement between Defendant Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or the “Co