Cases

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS Re: ECF Nos. 493, 495, 496, 497, 498, 499, 500, 501, 503 THIS ORDER RELATES TO ALL CASES JON S. TIGAR, District Judge Before the Court are nine motions to dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Consolidated Amended Complaint (“SCAC”) filed by Defendants Twitter, Inc.; Foodspotting, Inc. and Yelp! Inc.; Foursquare Labs, I

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS Re: ECF Nos. 393, 394, 395, 396 JON S. TIGAR, United States District Judge THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO ALL CASES I. Background... 1029 A. The App Store... 1031 B. The Subject Apps... 1032 C. Apple’s Representations... 1034

JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This Cause having been heard and considered, it is Ordered and Adjudged: AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CBT FLINT PARTNERS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RETURN PATH, INC., Defendant-Appellee, AND CISCO IRONPORT SYSTEMS, LLC, Defendant-Appellee. ______________________ 2013-1036 _________________

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ STRAIGHT PATH IP GROUP, INC., Appellant v. SIPNET EU S.R.O., Appellee ______________________ 2015-1212 ______________________ Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2013- 00246.

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 24-1212 In re: EILEEN T. ADAMS, Appellant On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey (District Court No. 1:22-cv-06256) District Judge: Honorable Karen M. Williams

No. 456 May 29, 2025 661 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ODELL TONY ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 18CR73436; A177071 Jerry B. Hodson, Judge. Argued and submitted October 11, 2023.

No. 456 May 29, 2025 661 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. ODELL TONY ADAMS, Defendant-Appellant. Multnomah County Circuit Court 18CR73436; A177071 Jerry B. Hodson, Judge. Argued and submitted October 11, 2023.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals The State, Respondent, v. Justin Adams, Appellant. Appellate Case No. 2017-001018 Appeal From Beaufort County Brooks P. Goldsmith, Circuit Court Judge Opinion No. 5728 Heard March 18, 2020 – Filed May 20, 2020

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ CBT FLINT PARTNERS, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RETURN PATH, INC., Defendant-Appellee, AND CISCO IRONPORT SYSTEMS, LLC, Defendants-Appellees. ______________________ 2012

NOTICE: All slip opinions and orders are subject to formal revision and are superseded by the advance sheets and bound volumes of the Official Reports. If you find a typographical error or other formal error, please notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Judicial Court, John Adams Courthouse, 1 Pemberton Square, Suite 2500, Boston, MA, 02108-1750; (617) 557- 1030; SJCReporter@sjc.state.ma.us SJC-13352 MARK A. ADAMS vs. SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA. Middlesex.

HUDSON, Judge. Plaintiff Tammy P. Frost, an employee of defendant Salter Path Fire and Rescue ("Salter Path"), claimed an injury as a result of a go-cart accident which occurred during a Fun Day event on 3 October 2001. Following a hearing on 31 March 2003 the deputy commissioner issued an opinion and award on 29 April 2004, denying plaintiff's claim for benefits. Plaintiff appealed, and on 8 February 2005, the Full Commission issue

Appellate Case: 24-9528 Document: 84-1 Date Filed: 03/03/2026 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH March 3, 2026 UNI

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 22a0042p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ ROBERT J. SCHULER, husband; NANCY D. SCHULER, │ wife; WINDEME

ENTRY ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TANYA WALTON PRATT, JUDGE, United States District Court, Southern District of Indiana The disputes in this matter surround complex legal issues following the United States Supreme Court’s mandate that legally married same-sex couples in the United States are entitled to the same privileges and benefits as legally married heterosexual couples. The Plaintiffs in t

Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON dissenting. Because I believe the record sustains the findings of fact made by the Industrial Commission, and because I believe those findings *189of fact support the Commission’s conclusions of law, I respectfully dissent. Appellate courts’ review of a decision by the Industrial Commission is limited to examinin

[Cite as State v. Adams, 2014-Ohio-5359.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CLARK COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellate Case No. 2014-CA-61 Plaintiff-Appellee : : Trial Court Case No. 02

Opinion CANTIL-SAKAUYE, C. J. A jury convicted defendant Marcus Dorwin Adams of the 1994 first degree murders of Dayland Hicks, Lamar Armstrong, and Trevon Boyd (Pen. Code, § 187), 1 the attempted murder of Luis Hernandez (§§ 187, subd. (a), 664), and carjacking (§ 215, subd. (a)). The jury found

Cite as 2021 Ark. App. 167 Elizabeth Perry ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document DIVISIONS III & IV No. CV-20-550 2023.06.26 15:21:20 -05'00' 2023.001.20174 Opinion Delivered: April 14, 2021 MARGARET E. NALLEY APPEAL

Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District In Division DAVID ROMANO, et al., ) ) Respondents, ) ) No. SD37377 v. ) ) Filed: June 4, 2024 MIKE R. & CARLA ADAMS, et al.