Cases

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER ON MOTIONS Appellate case names: Larry Adkins, Personal Representative of the Estate of Newbern Brown Adkins, et al. v. Lincoln Electric Co., et al.; Dorothy Wilson, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Arlie Richard Able, et al. v. Lincoln Ele

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER ON MOTIONS Appellate case names: Larry Adkins, Personal Representative of the Estate of Newbern Brown Adkins, et al. v. Lincoln Electric Co., et al.; Dorothy Wilson, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Arlie Richard Able, et al. v. Lincoln Ele

Opinion issued December 3, 2020 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-18-00993-CV NO. 01-18-01064-CV NO. 01-18-01071-CV ——————————— MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER ON MOTIONS Appellate case names: Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company, named as “Fictitious Party Hanover Insurance Group (on Behalf of Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company)” v. Newbern Brown Adkins, et al.; Larry Adkins, Personal Representative of the Est

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON ORDER ON MOTION Appellate case name: Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company Named as Fictitious Party Hanover Insurance Group (On Behalf of Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company) v. Newbern Brown Adkins, et al. Appellate case number: 01-18-00993-CV Trial court case number: 2017-6

AKINS v. BEN MILAM HEAT AIR & ELECTRIC INC. Skip to Main Content Accessibility Statement Help Contact Us

37 F.Supp.2d 55 (1999) Mary Kathryn LEWIS, for herself and on behalf of a class of similarly situated property owners, Plaintiff, v. GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant. No. Civ.A. 98-30057-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. February 12, 1999. *56 *57 Andrew A. Rainer, Shapir

342 F.3d 924 CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE UMATILLA INDIAN RESERVATION; Nez Perce Tribe, Petitioners,Warm Springs Tribe; Shoshone-Bannock Tribes of the Fort Hall Indian Reservation, Idaho; State of Oregon, Petitioners-Intervenors,Pacific Northwest Generating Cooperative, Intervenor,v.BONNEVILLE POWER ADMINISTRATION, Respondent,Public Power Council, Respondent-Intervenor.Sierra Club; Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermens Associ

598 F.2d 1339 4 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 38 Roma McKinney JUSTICE, Glen Justice, Fred McKinney, BettyMcKinney, Murrel McKinney, Alberta McKinney, Alva McKinneyQuinn, Jane McKinney, James McKinney, Georgine McKinney,Charles McKinney and Cindy McKinney, Appellees,v.PENNZOIL COMPANY, Appellant. No. 78-1151. United States Court of Appeals,Fourth Circuit.<

61 F.Supp. 476 (1944) GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. v. HYGRADE SYLVANIA CORPORATION et al. District Court, S. D. New York. March 30, 1944. *477 *478 *479 *480 Alexander C. Neave, of New York City (Harrison F. Lyman, of Boston, Mass., John H. Ande

CAMERON, Circuit Judge (dissenting). I noted my dissent from the opinion rendered in this case July 12, 1960 and published in 280 F.2d 531. Following are the grounds upon which my dissent is based. I. A clear understanding of the issues presented by this appeal requir

122 S.E.2d 838 (1961) Alice MORGAN v. INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA. No. 12094. Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia. Submitted September 6, 1961. Decided December 5, 1961. D. Grove Moler, Mullens, for appellant. R. D. Bailey, Bailey, Worrell & Bailey, Pineville, for appellee. CALHOUN, Judge. This case involves an

207 F.Supp. 718 (1962) SHOPPERS FAIR OF ARKANSAS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. The SANDERS COMPANY, Inc., Defendant. No. 1616. United States District Court W. D. Arkansas, Fort Smith Division. August 17, 1962. *719 Cole, Friedman & Deitz, New York City, Warner, Warner & Ragon, Fort Smith, Ark., for plaintiffs. Brya

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 205 Affirming in part and reversing in part. This appeal is prosecuted from a judgment of the Casey circuit court, awarding the appellee, Lincoln Wells, damages in the sum of $150, caused by overflow of his land, and a mandatory injunction ordering the appellant company to lower its concrete dam by removing 15

POEFENRARGER, JlTDGIC : The intrusive character of the wrongful removal of natural gas from land and the essential elements of a bill in equity to enjoin the same, as a trespass working irreparable injury, are the subjects of the inquiries raised by this appeal from a decree sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff’s bill and dismissing it. *166The ga

OPINION OF THE COURT VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judge. Having exhausted its administrative remedies, the Rushton Mining Company *717 petitions this court, pursuant to 30 U.S. C.A. § 816(a) (1971), 1 to set aside two decisio

551 S.E.2d 369 (2001) 209 W.Va. 726 STATE of West Virginia ex rel. Ronald ALLMAN, et al., on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated; Carol Hartley, et al., on Behalf of Themselves and Others Similarly Situated; and Alfretta Baugh, Administratrix of the Estate of Warren H. Baugh, Deceased, et. al., on Behalf of Themselves and Other Similarly Situated, Petitioners, v. Honorable A. ANDREW MACQUEEN, III, Senior Sta

CARAWAY, J. hThe plaintiff was injured after a large pine tree fell across a roadway onto his car on a highway in Ruston, Louisiana. Plaintiff suffered a broken neck, bruises and contusions as the result of the accident. Suit was filed against the property owner where the tree was located and the State of Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (“DOTD”). After a jury denied plaintiffs claims, he pursued this app

946 A.2d 1171 (2008) Deborah L. KEDY, Legal Representative for the Estate of Brian Scallion et al. v. A.W. CHESTERTON CO. et al. In re Asbestos Litigation. Nos. 2005-332-M.P., 2005-319-M.P. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. May 9, 2008. *1175 Gerald Petros, Esq., Providence, for General Electric, petitioner. Robert J. Qui

McDonald, J. For three centuries, Maryland law has provided that an action seeking payment of back rent for a residential lease is to be brought before the expiration of a three-year period of limitations. That period of limitations is currently reflected in Maryland Code, Courts & Judicial Proceedings Article ("CJ"), § 5-101. In recent decades, the question has arisen whether the