Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “ALBERT PEREZ GONZALEZ”
Gary Gonzalez v. Ione Grimmpublic domain
OPINION ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE,. Chief Justice This is an appeal from a directed verdict. Gary Gonzalez sued lone Grimm for malicious prosecution. At the time of events in question, Grimm was a middle school principal and Gonzalez was the father of two students at the school. The malicious prosecution claim arose out of Gonzalez’ arrest on a char
Perez v. Nidek Co. Ltd.public domain
657 F.Supp.2d 1156 (2009) Robert PEREZ, Nancy Art and Brett Harbach, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. NIDEK CO. LTD., et al., Defendants. Case No. 08cv1261 BTM(JMA). United States District Court, S.D. California. August 31, 2009. *1159 Duane A. Admire, Admire & Associates, Del Mar, CA,
United States v. Gonzalez-Arimontpublic domain
STAHL, Senior Circuit Judge. Defendant-appellant Albert Gonzalez-Arimont appeals his conviction and sentencing for aiding and abetting in an armed carjacking resulting in death, 18 U.S.C. § 2119(3), and for use of a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). Gonzalez-Arimont raises several issues. First, he appeals a district court order denying a mot
Robert Perez v. Nidek Co., Ltd.public domain
OPINION McKEOWN, Circuit Judge: We are asked to decide whether patients who suffered no injuries but who were subject to the off-label use of a medical device for eye surgeries may bring suit solely because the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) status of the device was not disclosed to them. The Third Amended Complaint (“the Complaint”) does not st
Albert Hambrick v. Foremost County Mutual Insurancepublic domain
NO. 12-23-00133-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS ALBERT HAMBRICK, § APPEAL FROM THE 2ND APPELLANT V. § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FOREMOST COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE, § CHEROKEE COUNTY, TEXAS APPELLEE
Moises Perez v. United Statespublic domain
SUTTON, J., delivered the opinion of the court in which CLELAND, D.J., joined. MERRITT, J. (pg. 992), delivered a separate dissenting opinion. Moises Perez pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm. The court deemed Perez an armed career criminal and sentenced him to 210 months. Our court affirmed the sentence. Perez filed this § 2255 motion, claiming his prior conviction for New York second degree robbery should n
Case: 17-15706 Date Filed: 11/01/2019 Page: 1 of 6 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 17-15706 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 3:17-cv-01260-BJD-MCR ALBERT HOLLAND, JR.,
Miralda v. Gonzalezpublic domain
ROSEMARY LEDET, Judge. Lin this legal malpractice action, the plaintiff, Marco Tulio Miralda, appeals the trial court’s judgment granting the peremptory exception .of peremption filed by the defendants, Romauldo Gonzalez, Sr., and the Law Offices of Romauldo Gonzalez, L.L.C. d/b/a Braden Gonzalez and Associates (collectively “Mr. Gonzalez”). Because we find the trial court properly applied the one-year peremptive period se
State v. Gonzalez-Valenzuelapublic domain
*453 LINDER, J. Defendant was convicted of two counts of child endangerment under ORS 163.575(l)(b), which prohibits knowingly permitting a minor “to enter or remain in a place where unlawful activity involving controlled substances is maintained or conducted.” The issue in this case is whether that statu
Amado Perez v. Statepublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-09-00535-CR Marcel Nwagwu, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 299TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-DC-07-904098, HONORABLE CHARLES F. BAIRD, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
RYAN, District Judge: Defendants appeal from judgments of conviction for conspiracy to violate and for violation of the currency laws of the United States (Sections 371, 472 and 473, Title 18, U.S.C.). *550 Both appellants, along wit
State v. Gonzalez-Valenzuelapublic domain
No. 56 December 24, 2015 451 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON STATE OF OREGON, Respondent on Review, v. JACKELIN GONZALEZ-VALENZUELA, Petitioner on Review. (CC C100316CR; CA A146278; SC S061751) En Banc On review from the Court of Appeals.* Argued and submitted May 7, 2014. David L. Sherbo-Huggins, Deputy Public Defe
297 F.3d 185 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Juan RAMIREZ, also known as "Tony TKO", also known as "Scarface"; Luis Ramirez; Ernesto Martinez, also known as "Ene"; Justin Perez, also known as Gem; Haydee Huertas; LNU1-98CR0438-006, also known as Rafaelito; Albert Colon; Shirley Calcano; Freddy Santiago; Jose Colon, also known as Mike; Odiot Demetrius, also known as J. Boogie; Manuel Gonzalez, also known as Manny; Julio Castillo, also k
Sanchez v. H & R Maintenance, L.C.public domain
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT TO ADD NECESSARY PARTIES MARCIA G. COOKE, District Judge. THIS MATTER is before me upon Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend Plaintiffs Amended Complaint to Add Necessary Parties (“Motion for Leave to Amend”) (ECF No. 28). Defendants filed their Response to Plaintiffs Untimely Motion for Leave to Amend Plaintiffs
Commonwealth v. Perezpublic domain
Cordy, J. A jury found the defendant, Jarm Perez, guilty of murder in the first degree on theories of deliberate premeditation and extreme atrocity or cruelty. On appeal, Perez argues that (1) the trial judge erred in admitting evidence of an assault on one of the Commonwealth’s witnesses, and in limiting the cross-examination of another; (2) the prosecutor’s closing argument was based on facts not in evidence; and (3) the final
Perez v. Great Wolf Lodge of the Poconos LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Robert D. Mariani, United States District Judge Presently before the Court is Defendants Great Wolf Lodge of the Poconos, LLC (“Great Wolf Lodge”) and Great Wolf Resorts, Inc. (“Great Wolf Resorts”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 147). For the' reasons that follow, Defendants’ motion will be denied. I. INTRODUCTION AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY On Ju
Perez v. Creations Associates, L.P.public domain
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Albert Emanuelli, J.), entered March 19, 2003, which, in this personal injury action, granted the motion of third-party defendant Appeal Locksmith, Inc. (ALI) to set aside the jury award of damages to the extent of directing a new trial on the issue of damages unless plaintiff stipulated to reduce the jury award for past pain and suffering from $1.5 million to $550,000 and the award for future pain and suffering from $2
438 F.2d 663 UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,v.John Albert LIGUORI, Appellee.UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,v.Jose GONZALEZ PEREZ and Francisco Rivas, Appellees.UNITED STATES of America, Appellant,v.Israel VALLEJO, Petitioner-Appellee. No. 350. No. 403. No. 404. No. 405. Docket 35
United States v. Gonzalez-DeLeonpublic domain
32 F.Supp.2d 925 (1998) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Lucia GONZALEZ-DELEON, Defendant. No. DR 98-CR-203(1) WWJ. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Del Rio Division. December 28, 1998. *926 Stephanie Smith-Burris, Asst. U.S. Atty, Del Rio, TX, for plaintiff. Molly Roth, Asst. Fed. Public Defender, Del Rio,
Gonzalez v. City of Laredopublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KAZEN, District Judge. Pending before this Court is Defendant Patricia Orozco’s motion to dismiss, or in the alternative, motion for summary judgment. This motion was originally referred to Magistrate Judge Notzon, who has recommended that Defendant Orozco’s motion be denied. The Defendant objects to the Magistrate’s recommendation. This case arises out of t