Cases

DIANA GRIBBON MOTZ, Circuit Judge, dissenting as to Part V.B.: We have held that in 2013, the General Assembly, acting with discriminatory intent, enacted a photo ID requirement to become effective in 2016. But in 2015, before the requirement ever went into effect, the legislature significantly amended the law. North Carolina recently held two elections in which the photo ID requirement, as amended, was in effec

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1845 LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA; A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE; UNIFOUR ONESTOP COLLABORATIVE; COMMON CAUSE NORTH CAROLINA; GOLDIE WELLS; KAY BRANDON; OCTAVIA RAINEY; SARA STOHLER; HUGH STOHLER, Plaintiffs, and LOUIS M. DUKE; CHARLES M. GRAY; ASGOD BARRANTES; JOSUE E. BERDUO; BRIA

Justice KENNEDY delivered the opinion of the Court. In 2008, North Carolina enacted a statute making it a felony for a registered sex offender to gain access to a number of websites, including commonplace social media websites like Facebook and Twitter. The question presented is whether that law is permissible under the First Amendment's Free Speech Clause, applicable to the States und

492 U.S. 573 (1989) COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY ET AL. v. AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, GREATER PITTSBURGH CHAPTER, ET AL. No. 87-2050. Supreme Court of United States. Argued February 22, 1989 Decided July 3, 1989[*] CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT *577 Peter Buscemi

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Thomas D. Schroeder, United States District Judge TABLE OF CONTENTS I.FINDINGS OF FACT... 332 A. North Carolina Voting Laws... 332 1. Voter ID... 332 2. Early Voting... 332 3. Out-of-Precinct Provisional Voting... 334

Reversed and remanded with directions by published opinion. Judge AGEE wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge-SHEDD concurs. Judge WILKINSON wrote a dissenting opinion. AGEE, Circuit Judge: The Board of Commissioners of Rowan County, North Carolina, (“the Board”) opens its public meetings with an invocation delivered by a member of the Board. The district court determined that practice violates the Estab

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1591 NANCY LUND; LIESA MONTAG-SIEGEL; ROBERT VOELKER, Plaintiffs - Appellees, v. ROWAN COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA, Defendant - Appellant. ---------------------------- STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA; STATE OF ALABAMA; STATE OF ARIZONA; STATE OF ARKANSAS; STATE OF FLORIDA; STATE OF INDIA

491 S.E.2d 535 (1997) ROSIE J., on her own behalf, and on behalf of all women similarly situated, Raleigh Women'S Health Organization, and John Marks, M.D. v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, C. Robin Britt, Sr., in his official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Human Resources, and James Hunt, in his official capacity as Governor of North Carolina. No. 232PA96. Sup

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1541 Doc: 81 Filed: 12/28/2022 Pg: 1 of 26 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1499 FARM LABOR ORGANIZING COMMITTEE; VALENTIN ALVARADO HERNANDEZ, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. JOSHUA STEIN,

USCA4 Appeal: 21-1499 Doc: 92 Filed: 12/28/2022 Pg: 1 of 26 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 21-1499 FARM LABOR ORGANIZING COMMITTEE; VALENTIN ALVARADO HERNANDEZ, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. JOSHUA STEIN,

658 F.Supp.2d 700 (2009) Lorn Glenn WEBB, Plaintiff, v. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CRIME CONTROL AND PUBLIC SAFETY, ALCOHOL LAW ENFORCEMENT DIVISION, Defendant. No. 7:08-CV-90-D. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Southern Division. September 11, 2009. *703 Julius LeVonne Chambers, Ferguson Stein Chambers Gresha

ORDER BRITT, District Judge. This case is before the court on (1) defendants’ motion for summary judgment on (a) plaintiffs claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1981; (b) plaintiff’s Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the Rehabilitation Act (“RA”) claims; and (c) plaintiff’s claims for injunctive relief; (2) defendants’ motion to strike certain exhibits submitted by plaintiff with his response to d

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the opinion, in which Judge WIDENER and Judge FLOYD joined. OPINION KING, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs Charles F. Lambeth, Jr. and Michael D. Lea appeal the district court’s dismissal of their complaint in this civil action for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 8, 2020 Decided January 19, 2021 No. 19-1140 AMERICAN LUNG ASSOCIATION AND AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIATION, PETITIONERS v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY AND ANDREW WHEELER, ADMINISTRATOR, RESPONDENTS AEP GENERATING COMPANY, ET AL.,

TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge. 1 *212 The Commonwealth of Massachusetts brought suit on October 6, 2017, to enjoin the enforcement of two federal Interim Final Rules (together, the "IFRs") promulgated by the United States Departments

OPINION 1 PER CURIAM: We are asked to delineate the statutory and constitutional limits to the President’s power to control immigration in this appeal of the district court’s order preliminarily enjoining two sections of Executive Order 13780 (“E02” or “the Order”), “Protecting the Nation From Fore

152 F.3d 1136 26 Media L. Rep. 2199, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6353,98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 8799 S.O.C., INC.; Richard Soranno; Hillsboro Enterprises,Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants,andAmerican Civil Liberties Union, Intervenor-Appellant,v.COUNTY OF CLARK; Las Vegas Metro Police Department;Lorraine Hunt; Myrna Williams; Erin Kenney; BruceWoodbury; Yvonne Atkinson Gates; Lance Malone; M

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge FLOYD wrote the opinion, in which Judge GREGORY and Judge DUNCAN joined. FLOYD, Circuit Judge: Maryland allows any voter to vote via absentee ballot. A voter may obtain a blank hardcopy absentee ballot by mail, fax, or by downloading and printing one from a website. The hardcopy ballot must be marked by hand, signed, and

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DECERTIFY THE CLASS GOLD, District Judge. THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Defendants’ Motion to Decertify the Class [D.E. 699], filed on February 23, 2001. Plaintiff filed a Response [D.E. 736] on April 11, 2001, and Defendants filed a Reply [D.E. 767] on May 4, 2001. In addition, the parties filed supplemental memoranda [D.E. # s 828, 859, 861, 884, 885

444 F.Supp.2d 467 (2006) Kimberly HOYLE, Plaintiff, v. UNITED AUTO WORKERS LOCAL UNION 5285, and The International Union UAW, Defendants. Civil No. 3:04CV518-H. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. August 3, 2006. *468 *469 Geraldine Sumter, Ferguson, Stein, C