Cases

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 20-3204 (RDM) DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) case is before the Court on cross-mot

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge This case arises from the establishment by Executive Order of the Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity (the “Commission”). Plaintiffs allege that the Commission is an advisory committee subject to the disclosure, notice, and reporting requirements of the Federal Adviso

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Chief Justice: Justices: Syllabus Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, ) et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-2320 (RBW) ) FEDERAL BUREAU OF

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES ) UNION, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-2320 (RBW) ) FEDERAL BUREAU O

Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Chief Justice: Justices: Syllabus Bridget M. McCormack Brian K. Zahra

ROBERT D. SACK, Circuit Judge, concurs in the opinion of the Court and files a separate concurring opinion. GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge: This appeal concerns the legality of the bulk telephone metadata collection program (the “telephone metadata program”), under which the National Security Agency (“NSA”) collects in bulk “on an ongoing daily basis” the metadata associated with telephone calls made by a

810 F.Supp.2d 267 (2011) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:08-cv-1100 (RBW). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 15, 2011. *269 Lee Ann Anderson McCall, Margaret K. Pfeiffer, Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP, Gabriel Ba

MEMORANDUM & ORDER WILLIAM H. PAULEY III, District Judge: The September 11th terrorist attacks revealed, in the starkest terms, just how dangerous and interconnected the world is. While Americans depended on technology for the conveniences of modernity, al-Qaeda plotted in a seventh-century milieu to use that technology against us. It was a bold jujitsu. And it succeeded because conventiona

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ______________________________________ ) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:08-cv-1100 (RBW) ) UNITED STATES

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued February 20, 2014 Decided May 9, 2014 No. 13-5064 AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION AND AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION, APPELLANTS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, APPELLEE Appeal from the United States District Court for the District

738 F.Supp.2d 93 (2010) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 08-1100 (RBW). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 20, 2010. *97 Lee Ann Anderson McCall, Margaret K. Pfeiffer, Sullivan & Cromwell, LLP, Washingto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA _______________________________________ ) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 08-1100 (RBW) ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge DEVER wrote the majority opinion, in which Judge KEENAN joined. Judge GREGORY wrote a dissenting opinion. OPINION DEVER, District Judge: From 1860 to 1863, the federal budget grew dramatically due to spending associated with the Civil War. Sadly, some unscrupulous people viewed the growing federal budget as a font to be plundered.

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey v. County Prosecutors Association of New Jersey (A-33-22) (087789) Argued October 10, 2023 -- Decided April 17, 2024 PATTERSON, J., writing fo

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey v. County Prosecutors Association of New Jersey (A-33-22) (087789) Argued October 10, 2023 -- Decided April 17, 2024 PATTERSON, J., writing fo

RONALD LEE GILMAN, Circuit Judge, dissenting. My colleagues conclude that the plaintiffs have not established standing to bring their challenge to the Bush Administration’s so-called Terrorist Surveillance Program (TSP). A fundamental disagreement exists between the two of them and myself on what is required to show standing and whether any of the plaintiffs have met that requirement. Because of that disagreemen

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES ) UNION FOUNDATION, ) ) FEMHEALTH USA, INC., d/b/a CARAFEM, ) ) MILO WORLDWIDE LLC, )

534 F.3d 181 (2008) AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION; Androgyny Books, Inc., d/b/a a Different Light Bookstores; American Booksellers Foundation for Free Expression; Addazi, Inc., d/b/a Condomania; Electronic Frontier Foundation; Electronic Privacy Information Center; Free Speech Media; Philadelphia Gay News; Powell's Bookstores; Salon Media Group, Inc.; Planetout, Inc.; Heather Corinna Rearick; Nerve.Com, Inc.; Aaron Peckham, d/b/a Urban Dictionary; Publi

506 F.Supp.2d 598 (2007) The AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF NEW MEXICO; The League of Women Voters of Albuquerque/Bernalillo County, Inc.; Sage Council; New Mexico Coalition to End Homelessness; Anne Kass; Alexandra Kazaras, and. Barbara Grothus, Plaintiffs, v. Millie U. SANTILLANES, Albuquerque City Clerk, Defendant. No. Civ. 05-1136 MCA/WDS. United States District Court, D. New Mexico.