Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
11 opinions for “AMERICAN HANDIWORK, INC. v. 84 LUMBER COMPANY, L.P.”
31 F.3d 1259 40 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 34 J & R ICE CREAM CORPORATION, a Corporation of the State of Florida,v.CALIFORNIA SMOOTHIE LICENSING CORPORATION, a Corporation ofthe State of New Jersey; California Smoothie International,Inc., a Corporation of the State of New Jersey,Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs,v.Jeffrey K. BAUGHER; Richard Rossetti, Third-Party Defendants,California Smoo
Vicki Linneman v. Vita-Mix Corp.public domain
RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0255p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT VICKI A. LINNEMAN and OBADIAH N. RITCHEY, on ┐ behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, │ Plaintiffs-Appellees,
Rafaeli LLC v. Oakland Countypublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Stephen J. Markman
Rafaeli LLC v. Oakland Countypublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Stephen J. Markman
State of Arizona v. William Mixtonpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. WILLIAM MIXTON, Appellant. No. CR-19-0276-PR Filed January 11, 2021 Appeal from the Superior Court in Pima County The Honorable Sean E. Brearcliffe, Judge
State of Arizona v. William Mixtonpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA STATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, v. WILLIAM MIXTON, Appellant. No. CR-19-0276-PR Filed January 11, 2021 Appeal from the Superior Court in Pima County The Honorable Sean E. Brearcliffe, Judge
Bostock v. Clayton Countypublic domain
(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2019 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v.
Tina Haskenhoff v. Homeland Energy Solutions, LLCpublic domain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–0574 Filed June 23, 2017 TINA HASKENHOFF, Appellee, vs. HOMELAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Chickasaw County, John J. Bauercamper, Judge. Employer appeals judgment on jury verdict for plaintiff on claims for sexual harassment and retaliation. DISTRICT COURT JUDGMENT REVERSED AND CASE REMANDED FOR NEW T
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF IOWA No. 15–0574 Filed June 23, 2017 Amended August 25, 2017 TINA HASKENHOFF, Appellee, vs. HOMELAND ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC, Appellant. Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Chickasaw County, John J. Bauercamper, Judge. Employer appeals judgment on jury verdict for plaintiff on claims for sexual harassment and retaliation. DISTRICT COU
United States v. Associated Presspublic domain
L. HAND, Circuit Judge. This action comes before a special court, convened under § 28 of 15 U.S.C.A., upon a motion by the plaintiff for summary judgment. The complaint charged that the defendants had conspired to restrain and monopolize interstate commerce in violation of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1-7, 15 note, and the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 730, and prayed that they be enjoined. The particulars of the charge may -be sum
St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co. v. Henwoodpublic domain
157 F.2d 337 (1946) ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RY. CO. v. HENWOOD et al. SOUTHERN PAC. CO. v. SAME. DAVIS et al. v. SAME (two cases). MEYER v. SAME. Nos. 12882-12886. Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. August 26, 1946. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing October 22, 1946. *338