Cases

PER CURIAM.* Carlos Amilcar-Flores appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Amilcar-Flores contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offe

551 F.3d 86 (2008) Jose AMILCAR-ORELLANA; Rebecca Alas-Izquierdo, Petitioners, v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General, Respondent. No. 08-1563. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Submitted November 4, 2008. Decided December 24, 2008. *87 Ilana Etkin Greenstein, Jeremiah Friedman, Maureen O'Sullivan,

17-4039(L) USA v. Campo Flores 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 2 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 3 ------ 4 August Term, 2018 5 (Argued: January 24, 2019 Decided: December 20, 2019) 6 Docket Nos. 17-4039(L), 17-4141(Con) 7 _________________________________________________________

PER CURIAM: * The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Jose Amilcar Brizuela has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Amil-car Brizuela has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the rel

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. Amilcar Guilloty Perez (“Guilloty”), an agent in the Special Investigation Bureau of the Puerto Rico Department of Justice, brought suit against four higher-ranking officials in the Department of Justice alleging that they retaliated against him for exercising his First Amendment rights. After an eight-day jury trial the district court granted the defendants’

SCHROEDER, Circuit Judge: Defendants Jose Lopez-Flores, Jose Eduardo Hernandez, Jose Perez-Garcia and Jaime Ortiz-Mejia appeal their convictions after jury trial for hostage taking, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1203(a), and use of a firearm in a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). The appellants held captive an alien who had been smuggled illegally into the United States. They demanded an amount of money fo

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Flores v. State, 57 So.3d 218 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010). HAZOURI, CIKLIN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

NUMBER 13-14-00323-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE OCEANOGRAFIA, S.A. de C.V., OTTO CANDIES, LLC, CANDIES MEXICAN INVESTMENTS, AND OSA INTERNATIONAL On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. ORDER Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Perkes and Longoria

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1739 JANET VAZQUEZ-VELAZQUEZ; RAMON A. DEL VALLE-LOPEZ; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP DEL VALLE-VAZQUEZ; CARLOS R. CESPEDES-GOMEZ; JOCELYN CALO-BIRRIEL; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP CESPEDES-CALO; SAUL O. ALMEDA-CRUZ; JUDITH NIEVES-RIVERA; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP ALMEDA- NIEVES; FRANCISCO M. ALVARADO-BARRIOS; MARILYN ALVAREZ-RIVERA; CONJUGAL PARTNERSHIP ALVARADO-ALVAREZ; JUAN C. ARROYO-RAMIREZ; DAMARIS VELEZ-RIOS;

PATRICK E. HIGGINBOTHAM, Circuit Judge: Johel Amilear Contreras was denied special rule cancellation of removal under § 203 of the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (NACARA) because the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) considered his 1992 Virginia conviction for “carnal knowledge of a child between thirteen and fifteen years of age” an “aggravated felony” a

63 F.3d 1468 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6319, 95 Daily JournalD.A.R. 10,779UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Jose LOPEZ-FLORES; Jose Eduardo Hernandez; JosePerez-Garcia; and Jaime Ortiz-Mejia, Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 93-50206, 93-50208, 93-50211 and 93-50216. United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. No. 93-50206 was Submitted on

MEMORANDUM OPINION Memorandum Opinion by Justice PERKES. 1 ’ ’ On June 11, 2014, relators Oceanografía, S.A. de C.V. (“Oceanografía”), Otto Candies, LLC (“Otto Candies”), Candies Mexican Investments (“Candies Mexican”), and OSA International, filed a petition for writ of ma

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-6086 MARIA ANGELICA GUZMAN CHAVEZ; DANIS FAUSTINO CASTRO CASTRO; JOSE ALFONSO SERRANO COLOCHO, Petitioners - Appellees, and CHRISTIAN FLORES ROMERO; WILBER A. RODRIGUEZ ZOMETA, Petitioners, v. RUSS

*276TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA SENTENCIA Comparece ante nos IM Winner Inc. (IM Winner o la apelante) mediante el recurso de epígrafe. Nos solicita que revoquemos la sentencia sumaria emitida por el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de San Juan (el TPI) el 5 de febrero de 2009 y notificada el 13 de marzo de 2009. Por medio de dicho dictamen, el TPI desestimó con perjuicio la

OPINION OF THE COURT Karla Moskowitz, J. This dispute involves the payment of wages to plaintiffs, undocumented aliens at the time of employment, who worked on defendants’ construction projects with municipal corporations, including the New York City School Construction Authority and the New York City Housing Authority. By this motion (sequence No. 004), defendants Kel-Tech Construction, Inc., Reliance Insur

(2008) In re CARIBBEAN PETROLEUM, LP., Debtors. Civil No. 04-1964 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. June 20, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER FOLLOWING BENCH TRIAL BESOSA, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs are 263 residents of Cabrera Development in Utuado; the development borders the Rio Grande de Arecibo. On July

390 F.Supp.2d 94 (2005) Alcides Roman ROMAN, et al., Plaintiffs v. Carlos O. DELGADO ALTIERI, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 01-1544 (DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. October 5, 2005. *95 *96 *97 *98