Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “ANTONIO GARCIA QUINONES”
Garcia-Rubiera v. Flores-Galarzapublic domain
516 F.Supp.2d 180 (2007) Gladys GARCIA-RUBIERA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Juan FLORES-GALARZA, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 02-1179(GAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. August 30, 2007. *181 *182 *183 *184 <
Rafael Garcia Quinones v. Statepublic domain
NO. 07-09-0193-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B OCTOBER 20, 2010 ______________________________ RAFEAL G. QUINONES, Appellant
Rafael Garcia Quinones v. Statepublic domain
NO. 07-09-0193-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL B OCTOBER 20, 2010 ______________________________ RAFEAL G. QUINONES, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee _______________________________ FROM THE 108th DISTRICT COURT OF POTTER COUNTY; NO. 57,455-E; HON. DOUGLAS R. WOODBURN, PRESIDING ______________________________
Rafael Garcia Quinones v. Statepublic domain
NO. 07-09-0193-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
United States v. Garcia-Rubiopublic domain
PER CURIAM.* Cayetano Garcia-Rubio appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Garcia-Rubio contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a separate offe
Sánchez v. Esso Standard Oil De Puerto Rico, Inc.public domain
747 F.Supp.2d 261 (2010) Jorge Francisco SÁNCHEZ and Dolores Service Station and Auto Parts, Inc., Plaintiffs, v. ESSO STANDARD OIL DE PUERTO RICO, INC., Defendant. Civil No. 08-2151 (JAF). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. August 2, 2010. *262 Orlando Cabrera-Rodriguez, Attorney and Counsellor at Law, San Juan, PR, f
in Re Manuel Quinonespublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-04-00503-CV IN RE Manuel QUINONES Original Mandamus Proceeding (1) PER CURIAM Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice Catherine Stone, Justice Karen Angelini, Justice Delivered and Filed: Augu
Miguel Quinones Iii v. Statepublic domain
NUMBERS 13-10-00140-CR 13-10-00141-CR 13-10-00142-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG MIGUEL QUINONES III, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF TE
Miguel Quinones Iii v. Statepublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER GARCIA-GREGORY, District Judge. Before the Court is Plaintiff Municipality of Mayagüez’s suit for breach of contract against Defendant Corporación Para el Desarrollo del Oeste. After a bench trial held from August 24, 2010 to September 2, 2010, the Court finds as follows, FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND The Corporación Para el Desarrollo del Oeste (he
Estate of Serracante v. Esso Standard Oilpublic domain
770 F.Supp.2d 459 (2011) ESTATE OF Antonio SERRACANTE, Composed of Renan, Carmen and Guillermo Antonio Serracante, Plaintiff, v. ESSO STANDARD OIL (PUERTO RICO), Defendant. Civil No. 09-1326(DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 17, 2011. *461 Orlando Cabrera-Rodriguez, Attorney and Counsellor at Law, San Juan
Opinion filed December 11, 2025 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-23-00289-CV __________ RUFINO PALMA FLORES AND JOSE LUIS ARELLANO QUINONES, Appellants V. RED ARROW COMPANY, LLC; GARMUZ, LLC; JESUS GARCIA MUNOZ; AND SINDY ALMENDARES, Appellees
Lincoln General Ins. v. Reynapublic domain
*349 KINKEADE, District Judge: This appeal stems from the entry of summary judgment in favor of Lincoln General Insurance Company (“Lincoln”) in a declaratory judgment action seeking the district court’s determination of Lincoln’s duty to defend Cesar Reyna (“Reyna”). For the following reasons, we AFFIRM
City of San Antonio v. Winkenhowerpublic domain
875 S.W.2d 388 (1994) CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, Appellant, v. Angie WINKENHOWER and Harry Winkenhower, Appellees. No. 04-93-00192-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, San Antonio. February 23, 1994. Rehearing Denied March 18, 1994. *389 Christine Chemell, Legal Services, VIA Metropolitan Transit Authority, Paula Dlugosz, As
United States v. Quinones Pitapublic domain
USCA1 Opinion March 22, 1993 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ No. 92-1304 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellee, v.
United States v. Perezpublic domain
328 F.3d 96 UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,v.Julio C. PEREZ, Jamie Ortiz, Jose Lopez, Jose Alejandro, Jose Richards, Luis Antonio Huertas, Elvin Burgos, Johnny Hernandez, Juan Sosa, Fernando Sanchez, Antonio Lopez, Pedro Cruz, Carmen Quinones, Damien Hurlburt, Patrick Rosenweig, Mario Larrondo, Angel Garcia, a.k.a. "Erick," Defendants,Luis Diaz, a.k.a. "Wiche," a.k.a. "Cheche," Defendant-Appellant. Docket N
United States v. Moreno-Diazpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER Defendant Gonzalo Antonio Moreno-Diaz appeals from a judgment entered on May 10, 2006 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Harold Baer, Jr., Judge) convicting him, after a plea of guilty, of conspiring to import one kilogram and more of heroin into the United States, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 960(b)(1)(A), 963, under two indictments.2 The District Court
Bautista Cayman Asset Co. v. J.A.M.A. Dev. Corp.public domain
GUSTAVO A. GELPI, United States District Judge Bautista Cayman Asset Company filed a complaint for collection of monies, execution of pledge, and foreclosure of mortgage against J.A.M.A. Development Corporation, Antonio Molina-Santos, Aida C. Machargo-Chardón, their conjugal partnership, the estate of Abraham Jiménez-Rivera, Nelly Rivera-Cano, the conjugal partnership Jiménez-Rivera, and Johanne Jiménez-Rivera, Marangely Jiménez-Riv
United States v. Perezpublic domain
SUMMARY ORDER THIS SUMMARY ORDER WILL NOT BE PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REPORTER AND MAY NOT BE CITED AS PRECEDENTIAL AUTHORITY TO THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT, BUT MAY BE CALLED TO THE ATTENTION OF THIS OR ANY OTHER COURT IN A SUBSEQUENT STAGE OF THIS CASE, IN A RELATED CASE, OR IN ANY CASE FOR PURPOSES OF COLLATERAL ESTOPPEL OR RES JUDICATA. At a stated term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, held a
Sanchez v. Triple-S Management, Corp.public domain
492 F.3d 1 (2007) Jose SANCHEZ; Nilsa Irizarry; Conjugal Partnership Sanchez-Irizarry, d/b/a, Laboratorio Clinico Irizarry Guash; Delma Rodriguez; Wilmer Roldan; Conjugal Partnership Roldan-Rodriguez, d/b/a Laboratorio Salimar; Maite Rolon-Balseiro; Cesar Del-Valle-Vague; Conjugal Partnership Del-Valle-Rolon, d/b/a Laboratorio Clinico Rolon; Oim Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Laboratorio Clinico Ramos; Elba Rivera-Martinez; Conjugal Partnership Melendez-Rivera