Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “ARE-East River Science Park, LLC v. New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation”
Faber v. Ciox Health, LLCpublic domain
S. THOMAS ANDERSON, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Before the Court are Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 87) and Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (ECF No. 95). Defendant Ciox Health, LLC, d/b/a Healthport Technologies, LLC, seeks dismissal of Plaintiffs' class-action and individual claims stemming from allegations of routine and systematic overcharging for access to medical records. Plaintiffs Rich
GREMILLION, Judge. BThe defendant, the State of Louisiana, through. the Department of Health and Hospitals (DHH), appeals a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Murphy Cormier General Contractor, Inc. (MCGC).1 For the following reasons, we affirm. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND MCGC manufactures, sells, and installs residential and commercial mechanic
New York v. Town of Clarkstownpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge: Third-Party Plaintiffs Allied Waste North America Inc., for itself and its subsidiaries, including, without limitation, American Disposal Services of New Jersey, Inc. and BFI Waste Systems of New Jersey, Inc., and insofar as it and its subsidiaries are alleged to be a successor to Vincent Ippolito, Inc. and Round Lake Sanitation Corp., Barr La
James O. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) the Defendants' Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e), filed March 28, 2018 (Doc. 57)("Motion"); (ii) the Plaintiff's Motion to Strike the Declaration of Jeffrey Wu or in the Alternative Grant Plaintiff Leave to Take Discovery, filed April 23, 2018 (Doc. 61)("Motion to Strike"), an
Mayor and City Council of Balt v. Alex Azar, IIpublic domain
ON REHEARING EN BANC PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1614 MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Health and Human Services; DIANE FOLEY, M.D.,
ACCEPTED 03-15-00085-CV 5176028 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
Opinion of the Court by POLLACK, J. This case requires us to consider whether Pila'a 400, LLC (Pila'a 400) was properly held responsible for remedial, restoration, and monitoring costs assessed against it by the Board of Land and Natural Resources (BLNR) for despoilment of state conservation land resulting from unauthorized land use by Pila'a 400, which included significant harm to a near-pristine coral reef
ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS
ACCEPTED 04-15-00469-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 9/3
in Re Certified Question (Midwest Inst of Health Vpublic domain
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan Syllabus Chief Justice: Justices: Bridget M. McCormack Stephen J. Markman
ACCEPTED 03-14-00718-CV 4288348 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
A.J.P. Oil Company, LLC D/B/A Grapeland Fuel & BBQ, and Andrew J. Patton v. Velvin Oil Company, Inc.public domain
ACCEPTED 06-15-00061-cv SIXTH COURT OF APPEALS TEXARKANA, TEXAS 10/26/2015 9:54:40 PM
ACCEPTED 15-25-00028-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 5/27/2025 4:56 PM NO. 15-25-00028-CV-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Servicespublic domain
9 A.3d 882 (2010) 204 N.J. 320 Lula M. HENRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES; Hon. Clark E. Bruno, Acting Commissioner of Human Services; Trenton State Psychiatric Hospital; Gregory P. Roberts, Chief Executive Officer for Trenton State Psychiatric Hospital, Defendants-Respondents. A-69 September Term 2009. Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Portland Pipe Line Corp. v. City of S. Portlandpublic domain
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE A pipeline operator challenges a local ordinance prohibiting loading crude oil onto tankers and new structures for that purpose on the grounds that it is preempted under numerous federal and state laws, that it violates the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution, that it violates the business's civil rights, its due process rights, its right to avoid improper delegation,
ACCEPTED 04-15-00118-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEAL
the Port of Houston Authority of Harris County, Texas v. Zachry Construction Corporationpublic domain
ACCEPTED 14-10-00708-CV FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 6/12/2015 5:04:25 PM
ACCEPTED 03-15-00528-CV 7458584 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
ACCEPTED 03-14-00735-CV 4703327 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
ACCEPTED 03-14-00706-CV 4055487 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS