Cases

137 Nev., Advance Opinion 4, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, No. 81024 INC., F/K/A SICOR, INC.; BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION; AND MCKESSON MEDICAL-SURGICAL, INC., Petitioners, FILED vs. THE EIGHT

OPINION OF THE COURT COWEN, Circuit Judge. This appeal raises the question whether investors who sign unconditional promissory notes can raise fraud in the inducement as a defense to enforcement of those notes by the Resolution Trust Corporation (the *850“RTC”), where the RTC acquired the notes by taking over a bank that purchased them on the secondary mark

MEMORANDUM & ORDER CERTIFYING CLASS ACTIONS Jack B. Weinstein, Senior United States District Judge: Table of Contents I. Introduction ... 492 A. General Theory ... 492 B. Original Cases ... 493 II. Procedural Background ... 496 A. Overview of Cases ... 496 B. Motion to Dismiss for Lack

235 S.W.3d 163 (2007) PHC-MINDEN, L.P. d/b/a Minden Medical Center, Petitioner, v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, Respondent. No. 05-0823. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued November 16, 2006. Delivered August 31, 2007. *164 R. Brent Cooper, Diana L. Faust, Devon J. Singh, Cooper & Scully, P.C., Dallas, for petition

11/07/2018 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs October 16, 2018 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JEREMY ARTHUR KIMBLE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County No. CC17-CR-374 William R. Goodman III, Judge No. M2017-02472-CCA-R3-CD The D

WATERMAN, Justice. This case presents our first opportunity to address the impact of a defendant’s underage status on the Miranda custody analysis in light of J.D.B. v. North Carolina, 564 U.S. -, 131 S.Ct. 2394, 180 L.Ed.2d 310 (2011) (remanding to reconsider custody issue in light of thirteen-year-old suspect’s age). Our analysis turns o

Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court

116 F.3d 489 133 Lab.Cas. P 33,549, 3 Wage & Hour Cas.2d(BNA) 1792,97 CJ C.A.R. 1102 NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November

2022 IL App (1st) 221109 No. 1-22-1109 Second Division December 20, 2022 ____________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS

Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 367 {¶ 1} When the Industrial Commission of Ohio determines that a worker was not injured during the course and scope of her employment and that decision is not appealed to the court of common pleas, the determination is binding in subsequent litigation in which she must establish the same workpl

Cite as 2022 Ark. 27 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-21-185 Opinion Delivered: February 10, 2022 NIKITA LEE MAHONEY, KIMBERLY ANN SNODGRASS, CHRISTOPHER APPEAL FROM THE WHITE SNODGRASS, DETRICK BRANDON, COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT TINA MARIE PHARES, AND [NO. 73CV-18-874] DAZARIOUS BRAGGS,

Opinion issued March 7, 2013. In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-11-00014-CV ——————————— HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT AND HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS, Appellants V. EDWARD A. AND NORMA KERR, PATTIE ACKERM

2022 IL App (1st) 210824 No. 1-21-0824 Opinion filed January 27, 2022 Fourth Division ______________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS

THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Post Office Box 12248 Austin, Texas 78711 (512)463-1312 X3URT OF APPEALS ;uurt or Appals uiswitt August 31, 2007

ACCEPTED 03-15-00293-CV 8312780 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

14‐1963(L) Kirschenbaum, et al. v. 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2015 (Argued: November 18, 2015 Decided: July 20, 2016)

NOTICE: The attorneys on the attached list have the opportunity to comply with outstanding requirements prior to the effective date of the Supreme Court Order and not be administratively suspended. DATE: 07/16/2024 PENNSYLVANIA CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION PAGE: 1 TIME: 15:10:52 NON-COMPLIANT LAWYERS USER ID: jilgenfr ACTIVE

425 F.Supp.2d 1015 (2006) Diane MANN, as Trustee for the Estate of LeapSource, Inc., et al. Plaintiffs, v. GTCR GOLDER RAUNER, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company., et al., Defendants. No. CIV. 02-2099-PHX RCB. United States District Court, D. Arizona. March 28, 2006. *1016 *1017 Leo