Cases

939 A.2d 388 (2007) Eleanor ABRAMS, Executrix of the Estate of Kenneth Abrams, Appellant v. PNEUMO ABEX CORPORATION, American Standard, Inc., A.W. Chesterton, Inc., Brand Insulation, Inc., Brown Boveri Corporation, Burnham Boiler Corporation, Certainteed Corporation, Cleaverbrooks Co., Crane Co., Demming Division, Crane Packing, Crouse-Hinds, Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc., Dana Corporation, Dresser Industries, Inc., Durabla Manufacturing Co

Justice SAYLOR, Dissenting. I respectfully dissent, as I would find that Appellants’ claims against Crane were time-barred and incapable of revival by a subsequent change in the law. Under the legal framework in effect at the time Appellants initiated their lawsuits in the mid-1980s, the two-year statute of limitations applied to all claims arising from asbestos exposure. This limitation appl

PRESCOTT, J. This appeal arises out of a dispute between a homeowner and the architectural firm and general contractor that he hired to design and perform substantial renovations to his home and surrounding property in Greenwich. The plaintiff, Marc Abrams, appeals, following a trial to the court, from the judgment rendered against him on his complaint and on the counterclaims of the d

Dickerson, J., dissents, and votes to affirm the order insofar as appealed from, with the following memorandum in which Leventhal, J., concurs: The defendant’s parents owned a house on Staten Island for many years. The defendant lived with her parents in the premises from approximately 1962 through 1977. The defendant’s father died in 1980. The defendant’s mother continued to reside in the premises. In 1993, title to the house was

605 F.3d 238 (2010) In re ABRAMS & ABRAMS, P.A.; St. Martin, Williams And Bourque, Appellants. Jerry Pellegrin, Guardian Ad Litem for Mark Pellegrin, Plaintiff, v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, Defendant. v. Louisiana Association for Justice; American Association for Justice; Public Justice, Amici Supporting Appellants, Thomas Shipley Jones, Court-Assigned Amicus Counsel. In re Abrams &

488 P.3d 1043In the MATTER OF Robert E. ABRAMSSupreme Co

257 P.3d 167 (2011) In the Matter of Honorable Theodore ABRAMS Tucson Municipal Court Pima County, State of Arizona, Respondent. No. JC-11-0001. Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. August 4, 2011. *168 Osborn Maledon PA by Mark I. Harrison, Mark P. Hummels, Phoenix, Attorneys for Theodore C. Abrams. Commission on Judicial Conduct b

655 F.Supp.2d 48 (2009) Lucious ABRAMS, Plaintiff, v. Tom VILSACK, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture,[1] Defendant. Civil Action No. 08-1760 (PLF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 24, 2009. *49 Lucious Abrams, Keysvill, GA, pro se. Luke M. Jones, U.S. Department of Jus

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ ) LUCIOUS ABRAMS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 08-1760 (PLF)

70 F.Supp.2d 846 (1999) Richard N. ABRAMS, Plaintiff, v. UNITY MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. No. 99 C 3182. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. October 4, 1999. *847 *848 Andrew K. Miller, Forman & Miller, Chicago, IL, for Richard N Abrams, plaintiff.

69 F.Supp.2d 339 (1999) AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. James W. ABRAMS, Esq., In His Capacity as Administrator of the Estate of James M.S. Ullman, Esq.; The Estate of James M.S. Ullman; Salvatore Falconeri, In His Capacity as Executor of the Estate of Anthony Stergius; Raymond F. Gryga, In His Capacity as *340 Administrator of the Estate of Robert F. Gryga; The Estate of Robert F. Gryga; and Ro

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit No. 99-4108 Richard N. Abrams, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Unity Mutual Life Insurance Co., Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. No. 99 C 3182--Ruben Castillo, Judge. Argued October 25, 2000--Decided January 18, 2001 Before Bauer, Coffey, and Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judges. Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judge. In the funeral business, the term

Plurality Opinion by BELL, C.J., which WILNER and CATHELL, JJ., join. This case is the first of two pertaining to the eligibility requirements of a candidate for the office of the Attorney General of Maryland.1 The genesis of this case was the attempt by Mr. Thomas E. Perez (“Perez”), an attorney and law professor, one of the appellees, to run for the office

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge. In the funeral business, the term “pre-need” insurance refers to a product that a person may buy to provide in advance for funeral and burial expenses. Richard Abrams, who owned a number of funeral businesses, had some expertise in this kind of preneed life insurance. Unity Mutual Life Insurance (Unity) was interested in moving into the preneed mark

419 F.Supp.2d 476 (2005) Steven ABRAMS and Dante Scioscia, Plaintiffs, v. Duane READE, Defendant. No. 04 Civ. 5518(DLC). United States District Court, S.D. New York. November 21, 2005. *477 *478 David G. Gabor, Gabor & Gabor, Garden City, NY, for Plaintiffs. Craig R. Benson, Stephen

388 Mass. 468 (1983) 446 N.E.2d 1061 AMERICAN FAMILY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY vs. COMMISSIONER OF INSURANCE (and a companion case[1]). Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Suffolk. December 9, 1982. March 15, 1983. Present: HENNESSEY, C.J., LIACOS, ABRAMS, NOLAN, & O'CONNOR, JJ. *469

586 S.E.2d 435 (2003) 262 Ga. App. 761 ABRAMS et al. v. MASSELL. Massell v. Abrams et al. Nos. A03A1434, A03A1435. Court of Appeals of Georgia. August 14, 2003. *437 Pursley, Lowery & Meeks, Roy H. Meeks, Jr., Atlanta, F. Torgrimson, for appellants. Caldwell & Watson, Harmon W. C

ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on All Claims for Failure to Prove any Damages (doc. 227). This Motion has been briefed and is ripe for disposition.1 *1245I. Background. This action involves clai

ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to All Damages Predicated upon Events or Actions Occurring Prior to February 6, 1988 (doc. 224). This Motion has been briefed and is ripe for disposition.1 I. Background. This action involves claims that

ORDER WILLIAM H. STEELE, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Claims of Edgar and Emma Moss (doc. 234), Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Claims of Mary Ferrell (doc. 235), Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Claims of Johnnie Ware (doc. 236), and Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Claims of Ruth Everette (doc. 237). All f