Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
16 opinions for “Adolph L. Dunn and Patricia A. Dunn”
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr
979 F.2d 1095 24 Fed.R.Serv.3d 564 Larry L. and Patricia A. LONGDEN, et al., Plaintiffs,v.Jeffrey S. SUNDERMAN, et al., Defendants.Deborah R. MASSIE, A.P.C. and Approximately 1008 ClassPlaintiffs, Appellants,v.SUSMAN GODFREY, Burleson, Pate & Gibson, Furth, Fahrner &Mason, Much, Shelist, Freed, Denenberg, Ament &Eiger, P.C. and Schall, Boudreau & Gore,Appellees.
In Re One Meridian Plaza Fire Litigationpublic domain
820 F.Supp. 1492 (1993) In re ONE MERIDIAN PLAZA FIRE LITIGATION. Civ. A. Nos. 91-2171, 91-2172, 91-2226, 91-2227, 91-2374 and 91-2545 to 91-2547. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. April 15, 1993. *1493 *1494 Harold Berger, Berger & Montague, P.C., Mark R. Rosen, Mesirov, Gelman, Ja
ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS
In Re One Meridian Plaza Fire Litigationpublic domain
820 F.Supp. 1460 (1993) In re ONE MERIDIAN PLAZA FIRE LITIGATION. Civ. A. Nos. 91-2171, 91-2172, 91-2226, 91-2227, 91-2374, 91-2545, 91-2546 and 91-2547. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. April 15, 1993. *1461 *1462 *1463 Harold Berger, Berger &
Longden v. Sundermanpublic domain
JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge: PROLOGUE Appellant, Deborah R. Massie (Massie), on behalf of herself and some 1008 class *1098 plaintiffs, appeals from a district court judgment awarding attorneys’ fees to Ap-pellees (Susman Attorneys) in this securities fraud and RICO cla
v. Poudre School Dist R-1public domain
The summaries of the Colorado Court of Appeals published opinions constitute no part of the opinion of the division but have been prepared by the division for the convenience of the reader. The summaries may not be cited or relied upon as they are not the official language of the division. Any discrepancy between the language in the summary and in the opinion should be resolved in favor of the language in the opinion.
Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,420public domain
991 F.2d 1020 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,420 Kay N. BROWN; Gilbert Fennema; Minnie G. Fennema; HaroldJ. Lemmon; Marjorie T. Miller; William C. Findt; WilliamG. Brown; Loyette Eby; David Lawrence; Charles W. Manz,As Trustee for the Manz Family Trust; Jules Belkin; TonyArlotti; Rita G. Thye; Richard O. Slutzky; AlysonSlutzky; Judith Alterman; Central Machine & Welding, Inc.;George F. Ro
Miller v. Andrewspublic domain
[Cite as Miller v. Andrews, 2013-Ohio-2490.] COURT OF APPEALS RICHLAND COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT CAROL S. MILLER : JUDGES: : Plaintiff-Appellant/ : Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, P.J. Cross-Appellee : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, J.
Longden v. Sundermanpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Nos. 91–1592, 91–7028 and 92–1474. Larry L. and Patricia A. LONGDEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jeffrey S. SUNDERMAN, et al., Defendants. Deborah R. MASSIE, A.P.C. and Approximately 1008 Class Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. SUSMAN GOD
Longden v. Sundermanpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Nos. 91–1592, 91–7028 and 92–1474. Larry L. and Patricia A. LONGDEN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jeffrey S. SUNDERMAN, et al., Defendants. Deborah R. MASSIE, A.P.C. and Approximately 1008 Class Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. SUSMAN GOD
Dore, J. This is an appeal from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, New York county, involving the construction of the will of Charles Hirshon, and objections filed to an accounting of his trustees. The testator was survived by his widow and six children, five children of a previous marriage, and one (Beatrice H. Gerstman) a child of the second marriage. We deem it necessary to discuss only the issues raised b
United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri
Glass v. Commissionerpublic domain
NlMS, Judge: In these consolidated cases, respondent determined aggregate deficiencies in excess of $61 million in petitioners’ Federal income taxes for the years 1975 through 1980.2 Each of the petitioners in these cases entered into a series of transactions herein sometimes referred to for convenience as the London Options Transaction. Th
Brown v. E.F. Hutton Group, Inc.public domain
JACOBS, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-appellants appeal from so much of a judgment in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, John M. Walker, Circuit Judge, sitting by designation, 735 F.Supp. 1196, as (a) granted summary judgment to defendant E.F. Hutton Group, Inc. (“Hutton”) on plaintiffs-appellants’ claim that they were sold unsuitable securities in violation of Section 10(b) of the