⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Adrian Michael LeRoy”

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2012-01-17 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 13, 2011 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ADRIAN LEROY SCOTT Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2006-B-1108 Monte Watkins, Judge No. M2010-00625-CCA-R3-CD - Filed January 17, 2012 Following an indictment charging three counts of sexual battery by an authority figure and tw
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2013-08-13 · Published · cited 0×
Affirm in part; Reverse and Render in part; Remand and Opinion Filed August 13, 2013 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas __________________________________ NO. 05-12-00963-CV CITY OF DALLAS, TEXAS, Appellant V. ANTHONY ARREDONDO, CHARLES S. SWANER, JAM
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020-02-07 · Published · cited 0× · 115 N.Y.S.3d 736; 180 A.D.3d 1341; 2020 NY Slip Op 945
Matter of Lesinski v Ciamaga (2020 NY Slip Op 00945) Matter of Lesinski v Ciamaga 2020 NY Slip Op 00945 Decided on February 7, 2020 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau
State v. Pattersonpublic domain
Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2012-04-25 · Published · cited 0× · 812 N.W.2d 106; 2012 WL 1414311; 2012 Minn. LEXIS 155
OPINION PAGE, Justice. Appellant Adrian Patterson and his co-defendant Leroy Paul were indicted in Hennepin County on two counts of first-degree murder, in violation of Minn.Stat. § 609.185(a)(1), (3) (2010), and two counts of attempted first-degree murder, in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 609.185(a)(1), (3), 609.17 (2010). For his defense, Patterson retained Eric Newmark as his counsel of choice. Patterson was sch
State v. Scottpublic domain
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2009-01-28 · Published · cited 107× · 275 S.W.3d 395
OPINION WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which JANICE M. HOLDER, C.J., CORNELIA A. CLARK, and GARY R. WADE, JJ., and E. RILEY ANDERSON, SP.J., joined. This appeal involves the admissibility of expert testimony regarding a sleep para-somnia involving sexual behavior. A defendant charged with committing sexual acts with his stepdaught
State v. Pattersonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011-03-15 · Published · cited 1× · 796 N.W.2d 516; 2011 Minn. App. LEXIS 21; 2011 WL 891032
OPINION LARKIN, Judge. Appellant seeks reversal of his convictions of aiding and abetting drive-by shooting and aiding and abetting second-degree murder, arguing that he was deprived of his constitutional rights to counsel of his choice and conflict-free counsel and that the district court committed reversible error in admitting gang evidence at his jury trial. Appellant also requests modification of his
in Re Nettie Bivenspublic domain
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2020-12-29 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-20-00563-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE NETTIE BIVENS, ET AL. On Petition for Writ of Injunction. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion
District Court, M.D. Florida · 2018-04-10 · Published · cited 4× · 309 F. Supp. 3d 1196
VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE This matter comes before the Court pursuant to Defendants the Florida State Fair Authority's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 13), Sheriff Chad Chronister's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 17), and Deputies Henry Echenique, Mark Clark, Stephen Jones, and Adrian Chester's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. # 16), filed on February 23 and
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2021-03-04 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion issued March 4, 2021 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-20-00674-CV ——————————— IN RE EDUARDO DEL PINO, SPRING DEL PINO, ROBERT RUGGLES, GLORIA RUGGLES, ROBERT DAWKINS, DEMETRIA DAWKINS, EDDIE DELANEY, JENNIFER DELANEY, LEROY DELK, CAROLE DELK, MARTI
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009-11-19 · Published · cited 131× · 588 F.3d 864; 2009 WL 3855710
HAYNES, Circuit Judge: This matter comes before us as a single ease consolidated from appeals No. OS-31247 and No. 08-31248. Both appeals arise from the same underlying case and center on essentially the same concerns. Accordingly, we address them together. In No.08-31247, Wellons Inc. (“Wellons”) appeals the district court’s determination that Wellons failed to carry its burden o
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2012-05-30 · Published · cited 0×
FILED BY CLERK IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA MAY 30 2012 DIVISION TWO COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO CATALINA FOOTHILLS UNIFIED
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014-02-06 · Published · cited 135× · 742 F.3d 487; 2014 WL 463635
MARCUS, Circuit Judge: Three co-defendants — Michael Reeves, his wife Shawanna Reeves (“Halcomb-Reeves”), 1 and Thornton Moss — appeal their jury trial convictions for conspiracy to distribute cocaine. Both Reeves and Halcomb-Reeves argue that there was insufficient evidence to sustain their convictions. Halcomb-Reeves
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998-08-18 · Published · cited 11× · 153 F.3d 691
153 F.3d 691 135 Lab.Cas. P 33,712, 4 Wage & Hour Cas.2d(BNA) 1496 Jerome T. REDMAN; Bruce M. Rannow; Eric M. Newman; WayneC. Mapes; Glenn R. Minkel, on behalf ofthemselves and other employees similarlysituated; Michael Acton;Robert Algar; Plaintiffs;John Apling; Plaintiff-Appellant;Douglas Ardoff; Terrell Backensto; William W. Baggett;Rick Baker; Gary L. Barney; Ron Bawdo
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2000-10-26 · Published · cited 7× · 117 F. Supp. 2d 864; 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16259; 2000 WL 1638036
117 F.Supp.2d 864 (2000) Mary E. COOPER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED VACCINES, INC. and The Home Insurance Company, Defendants. No. 99-C-735. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. October 26, 2000. *865 Adrian P. Schoone, Schoone Leuck Kelley Pitts & Knurr, Racine, WI, Todd M. Johnson, Johnson Law Group, Minnetonka, MN, Mich
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021-09-27 · Published · cited 9× · 14 F.4th 1213
USCA11 Case: 20-11283 Date Filed: 09/27/2021 Page: 1 of 31 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 20-11283 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 6:18-cv-00515-CEM-GJK ANGEL COLON, NORMAN
District Court, E.D. New York · 2006-07-17 · Published · cited 3× · 438 F. Supp. 2d 76; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48357; 2006 WL 1980640
438 F.Supp.2d 76 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, v. Nat SCHLESINGER, also known as "Naftule Schlesinger" and "Zvi Pollack," Herman Niederman, and Goodmark Industries, Inc., Defendants. No. CR.02-485(ADS)(ARL). United States District Court, E.D. New York. July 17, 2006. *77 *78
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1990-07-31 · Published · cited 13× · 793 S.W.2d 139; 1990 Mo. LEXIS 74; 1990 WL 109511
793 S.W.2d 139 (1990) Darrell S. CLASPILL, Appellant, v. MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, Respondent. No. 72264. Supreme Court of Missouri, En Banc. July 31, 1990. J. Michael Cronan, Kansas City, for appellant. Jay M. Nadlman, North Kansas City, for respondent. HIGGINS, Judge. Darrell Claspill appeals from an adverse jury verdict and judgment
Nevada Supreme Court · 2021-03-04 · Published · cited 0× · 2021 NV 6
137 Nev., Advance Opinion 4, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, No. 81024 INC., F/K/A SICOR, INC.; BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION; AND MCKESSON MEDICAL-SURGICAL, INC., Petitioners, FILED vs. THE EIGHT
Lockett v. Hillpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002-07-03 · Published · cited 3× · 182 Or. App. 377; 51 P.3d 5; 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1019
SCHUMAN, J. Defendant’s dogs killed plaintiffs’ cat. The trial court found that defendant was negligent and awarded plaintiffs $1,000 in compensatory damages but denied plaintiffs’ claims for negligent infliction of emotional distress and loss of companionship. Plaintiffs appeal, arguing that they should be compensated for emotional distress resulting from witnessing the death of their pet. We affirm. Althou
State v. Folsompublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993-07-23 · Published · cited 0× · 630 So. 2d 1129; 1993 WL 273981
630 So.2d 1129 (1993) STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Lawrence B. FOLSOM, Domingo Aguirre, Delbert Baker, Gary C. Bass, Kenneth S. Bielen, Berneta Bollard, Clifford Earl Boyte, Daryl Braddy, Kirk David Brown, Darling D. Buffington, Royce Wendell Bullington, Thomas David Burns, Noe Carmona, Gerald W. Chasteen, James D. Combee, Robbie Cottrell, Mark Devlin, Michael Dewitt, Hershell Dial, Santiago Carbajal Diaz, Robert V. Dinsdale, Milton K. Dooley,