⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Adroit Energy Inc”

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014-09-05 · Published · cited 2× · 236 N.C. App. 340; 762 S.E.2d 666; 2014 N.C. App. LEXIS 982
*358ERVIN, Judge, dissenting. Although I agree with my colleagues concerning the proper resolution of Defendant’s challenge to the denial of his motion to dismiss based upon governmental immunity and justiciabiity grounds, I am unable to agree with their determination that a portion of Defendant’s appeal from the issuance of the preliminary injunction di
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2005-06-24 · Published · cited 72× · 877 A.2d 975; 2005 WL 1587416
877 A.2d 975 (2005) In re TOYS "R" US, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION. Cons. C.A. No. 1212-N. Court of Chancery of Delaware. Date Submitted: June 17, 2005. Date Decided: June 22, 2005. Date Corrected: June 24, 2005. *978 Andre G. Bouchard, Esquire, and Joel Friedlander, Esquire, Bouchard Margules & Frie
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014-12-08 · Published · cited 134× · 773 F.3d 1076; 2014 WL 6872148
TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge. This case requires us to consider the certification of a proposed class action to pursue claims under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). A class primarily composed of real estate borrowers sued a group of lenders, claiming the lenders conspired to create a fraudulent scheme to obtain nonrefundable up-front fees in return fo
District Court, S.D. New York · 2004-02-17 · Published · cited 3× · 306 B.R. 33; 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2291; 2004 WL 307269
306 B.R. 33 (2004) In re ENRON CORP., et al., Debtors, Enterprise Products Operating, L.P., Appellant, v. Enron Gas Liquids Inc., Appellee. No. 03 Civ. 7145(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. February 17, 2004. *34 Martin J. Bienenstock, Brian S. Rosen, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, New York City, Gregory S.
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1993-12-06 · Published · cited 17× · 161 B.R. 414; 30 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 710; 1993 Bankr. LEXIS 1843; 25 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 30; 1993 WL 521232
161 B.R. 414 (1993) In re OUTDOOR SPORTS HEADQUARTERS, INC. successor by merger to Munson Sporting Goods Co., Inc. and Seven Seas Products, Inc. and successor in interest to Southern Gun & Tackle, Inc., J.W. Murchison Company, Inc., Gopher Shooter's Supply Company, Inc., Dickerson Supply Company, Inc., Oscar Robbins and Company, Central Sales Corp., M. Sharf & Co., Southeastern Sporting Goods, Whitney Sporting Goods Company and Alpha Sports, Inc.
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2001-06-18 · Published · cited 103× · 789 A.2d 14; 2001 WL 675330
789 A.2d 14 (2001) In re IBP, INC. SHAREHOLDERS LITIGATION. IBP, Inc., Defendant and Cross-Claim Plaintiff, and Counterclaim Defendant, v. Tyson Foods, Inc. and Lasso Acquisition Corporation, Defendants, Cross-Claim Defendants and Counterclaim Plaintiffs. Civil Action No. 18373. Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle County. Submitted: June 3, 2001. Deci
District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1999-02-26 · Published · cited 1× · 232 B.R. 252; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5190; 1999 WL 223161
232 B.R. 252 (1999) In the Matter of ALABAMA STATE FAIR AUTHORITY, Debtor. Max C. Pope, Sr., as Special Trustee for Alabama State Fair Authority, Plaintiff (Appellee), v. Haas & Wilkerson, Inc., Defendant (Appellant). Max C. Pope, Sr., as Special Trustee for Alabama State Fair Authority, Plaintiff (Appellee), v. Alabama Power Company, Defendant (Appellant). Max C. Pope, Sr., as Special Trustee for Alabama State Fair Author
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston) · 2015-03-25 · Published · cited 0×
NO. 01-15-00267-CV FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS FOR THE 1ST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS 3/25/2015 12:01:47 PM AT HOUSTON CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 2015-05-11 · Published · cited 0×
ACCEPTED 05-14-00544-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 5/11/2015 10:04:41 AM
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2018-01-26 · Published · cited 0×
ORIG INA 3Jn tbe Wniteb ~tate.s QCourt of jfeberal QClaim.sFILED No. 17-1175C (Filed: January 26, 20 18) JAN 2 6 2018 U.S. COURT OF ************************************* FEDERAL CLAIMS WILLIAM J. ROHLAND,
District Court, D. Kansas · 1990-07-06 · Published · cited 43× · 741 F. Supp. 1472; 31 Fed. R. Serv. 97; 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8300; 1990 WL 94580
741 F.Supp. 1472 (1990) Diana L. MASON, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Otis W. Mason, Plaintiff, v. TEXACO, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 78-1337. United States District Court, D. Kansas. July 6, 1990. *1473 *1474 *1475
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014-04-03 · Published · cited 11× · 235 Ariz. 1; 326 P.3d 268; 683 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 20; 2014 WL 1327971; 2014 Ariz. App. LEXIS 56
OPINION SWANN, Judge. ¶ 1 In this securities fraud case, we must decide whether the Plaintiffs were required to elect between the remedies of rescission and damages, whether the court properly denied them the remedy of rescission after they prevailed at trial on liability, and whether their election of rescission was revocable once the court determined after trial that the remedy was unavailable. We hold tha
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988-07-28 · Published · cited 4× · 850 F.2d 1069; 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 11217; 1988 WL 76939
ALVIN B. RUBIN, Circuit Judge: In 1986 this court decided that a federal district court had not abused its discretion in abstaining from deciding federal issues presented in suit to enjoin a state agency’s proceeding to fix the retail rates that might be charged by a public utility. Bound by this decision, we hold again that the same district court did not abuse its discretion i
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2020-02-27 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LANCE SALLADAY, On Behalf of ) Himself and All Other Similarly Situated ) Former Stockholders of ) INTERSECTIONS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2019-0048-SG ) BRUCE L. LEV, DAVID
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985-12-17 · Published · cited 42× · 711 P.2d 98; 1985 OK 104; 89 Oil & Gas Rep. 135; 1985 Okla. LEXIS 178
OPALA, Justice, with whom HODGES and SUMMERS, JJ., join concurring in the judgment. The essence of today’s opinion is that, when an assessment is to be made of a drilling activity’s conformity to the terms of a pooling order, the issue pressed for resolution lies within the Corporation Commission’s [Commission or agency] exclusive cognizance to “clarify” its prior orders and to “determine”
Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988-11-01 · Published · cited 61× · 765 S.W.2d 42; 1988 WL 114588
765 S.W.2d 42 (1988) Betty L. ELAM, Clarence Elam and Linda Lou Sanders, Ethel M. Berry, Carl C.[*] and Jacqueline Berry, Virgil and Dorothy Bradley, Edward and Malva Gehlken, Dainie and Mary Lucetta Landon,[*] Gwendolyn and John C. Lawrence, Glen A. and Bernice Miller, Charlotte A. and John Phillips, Daniel Charles and Joyce Pryor and Amber Cross, Arnold L., Joy R., Joyce and Tammy Sommers, James R., Kay D., William Lance, Lisa and
Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2020-07-24 · Published · cited 0×
NOT FOR PUBLICATION 1 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE TENTH CIRCUIT _________________________________ IN RE THE ASPEN CLUB & SPA, LLC, BAP No. CO-19-043 Debtor. IN RE ASPEN CLUB REDEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC, Bankr. No. 19-14158 Chapter 11
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006-01-03 · Published · cited 60× · 126 P.3d 165; 212 Ariz. 18; 468 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 9; 2006 Ariz. App. LEXIS 1
126 P.3d 165 (2006) 212 Ariz. 18 Vishal CHAURASIA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV 04-0264. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E. January 3, 2006. *168 Krohn & Moss, Ltd. By Marshall Meyers, Phoenix, Attorneys for Plaintiff-Appellant.
California Court of Appeal · 1985-07-02 · Published · cited 7× · 170 Cal. App. 3d 438; 216 Cal. Rptr. 462; 11 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2491; 1985 Cal. App. LEXIS 2248
170 Cal.App.3d 438 (1985) 216 Cal. Rptr. 462 SAN FRANCISCO NEWSPAPER PRINTING COMPANY, INC., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY, Respondent; SHARON A. MILLER, as Executrix, etc., Real Party in Interest. Docket No. H000535. Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District. July 2, 1985. *440
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2017-05-26 · Published · cited 42× · 239 W. Va. 264; 800 S.E.2d 850; 2017 WL 2333083; 2017 W. Va. LEXIS 407
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2017 Term FILED No. 16-0136 May 26, 2017 Released at 3:00 p.m. RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK