⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Advance Local Media LLC v. Cohere Inc.”

District Court, S.D. New York · 2014-05-28 · Published · cited 3× · 73 F. Supp. 3d 175; 199 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3479; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72657; 2014 WL 2208012
OPINION & ORDER PAUL A. ENGELMAYER, District Judge: Plaintiff William J. Pfunk (“Pfunk”) brings this action under the Uniformed *177Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act, 38 U.S.C. §§ 4301-4335 (“US-ERRA”). Pfunk makes two related claims. First, he asserts, his military obligation to the United States Army Reserves was a “m
District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-09-28 · Published · cited 7× · 210 F. Supp. 3d 579; 2016 WL 5478468; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134484
*584MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Naomi Reice Buchwald, United States District Judge Plaintiff Suzanne Boelter brings this action against defendant Advance Magazine Publishers Inc., d/b/a Condé Nast (“Condé Nast”), alleging that Condé Nast disclosed her subscription information in violation of the Michigan Preservation of Personal Privacy Act, Mich. Comp. Laws
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016-02-23 · Published · cited 8× · 421 U.S. App. D.C. 255; 815 F.3d 821; 205 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3397; 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 3095
Opinion for the Court filed by Senior Circuit Judge EDWARDS. EDWARDS, Senior Circuit Judge: NBCUniversal Media, LLC (“NBC” or the “Company”) petitions for review of a 2014 Decision and Order of the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”). The Board cross-petitions for enforcement. Because, as described below, we are unable to discern the r
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012-04-03 · Published · cited 392× · 680 F.3d 162; 40 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1585; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 6715; 2012 WL 1085948
680 F.3d 162 (2012) ANDERSON NEWS, L.L.C., Lloyd T. Whitaker, as the Assignee under an Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors for Anderson Services, L.L.C., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMERICAN MEDIA, INC., Bauer Publishing Co., LP, Curtis Circulation Company, Distribution Services, Inc., Hachette Filipacchi Media, U.S., Hudson News Distributors LLC, Kable Distribution Services, Inc., Rodale, Inc., Time Inc., Time/Warner Retail Sales & Marketi
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2023-05-30 · Published · cited 19× · 68 F.4th 1203
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JASON SCOTT COLLECTION, No. 21-16978 INC., an Arizona corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-02712- v. JJT TRENDILY FURNITURE, LLC, a Texas limited liability company; OPINION TRENDILY HOME COLLECTION, LL
District Court, S.D. New York · 2014-03-18 · Published · cited 5× · 6 F. Supp. 3d 317
OPINION & ORDER DENISE COTE, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS *319INTRODUCTION. co CO o FINDINGS OF FACT. CO CO CO I. The American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers . Co co CO A. ASCAP Background. CO CO CO B. The ASCAP Consent Decree. CO CO CO</
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018-02-27 · Published · cited 30× · 883 F.3d 169
15‐3885(L) Fox News Network, LLC v. TVEyes, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2016 (Argued: March 7, 2017
District Court, S.D. New York · 2016-02-16 · Published · cited 4× · 162 F. Supp. 3d 295; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18462; 2016 WL 626557
OPINION AND ORDER Ramos, United States District Judge. This is a copyright and trademark case arising from the creation of a group of musical compositions, sound recordings, and a trademark in the late 1960s. The *301dispute has come to a head only recently because, in 2006, the pop artist Christina Aguilera obtained a license from some of the defe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017-03-21 · Published · cited 4× · 851 F.3d 1002; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 4999; 2017 WL 1056095
OPINION O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: We must decide whether a service that captures copyrighted works broadcast over the air, and then retransmits them to paying subscribers over the-Internet without the consent of the copyright holders, is a “cable system” eligible for a compulsory license under the Copyright Act. I
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2021-08-31 · Published · cited 1× · 12 F.4th 778
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 19, 2020 Decided August 31, 2021 No. 20-1010 LOCAL 23, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS, PETITIONER v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, RESPONDENT On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board Matthew J. Ginsburg argued
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025-09-09 · Published · cited 0×
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NETCHOICE, LLC, No. 25-146 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 5:24-cv-07885- EJD v. ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of California, OPINION Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the
District Court, S.D. New York · 2008-06-24 · Published · cited 0× · 623 F. Supp. 2d 414; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48758; 2008 WL 2566559
(2008) VDP PATENT, LLC, Plaintiff, v. WELCH ALLYN HOLDINGS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. 06 Civ. 5821 (GEL). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 24, 2008. Michael B. Weiss, Cahill Gordon & Reindel LLP, New York, NY, for plaintiff. Douglas J. Nash and John D. Cook, Hiscock & Barclay, LLP, Syracuse, NY, for defendants. OPI
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2022-02-04 · Published · cited 0×
CORRECTED In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 21-1966C (Filed Under Seal: January 18, 2022) (Filed: February 4, 2022) ) GOLDEN IT, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, )
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2022-02-04 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 21-1966C (Filed Under Seal: January 18, 2022) (Filed: February 4, 2022) ) GOLDEN IT, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2024-06-18 · Published · cited 7× · 349 Conn. 268
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
Page v. Oath Inc.public domain
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2022-01-19 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE CARTER PAGE, § § No. 79, 2021 Plaintiff Below, § Appellant, § Court Below: Superior Court § of the State of Delaware v. § § C.A. No. S20C-07-030 OATH INC., § § D
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2022-05-13 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SDF FUNDING LLC and STUART D. ) FELDMAN, derivatively on behalf of ) FLASHPOINT TECHNOLOGY, INC., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2017-0732-KSJM ) STANLEY B. FRY, EDWARD D.
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2023-09-01 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SORRENTO THERAPEUTICS, INC., a ) Delaware corporation, and SCILEX ) PHARMACEUTICALS INC., a Delaware ) corporation, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2021-0210-PAF )
District Court, E.D. Texas · 2015-07-22 · Published · cited 0× · 115 F. Supp. 3d 837; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 95273
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER CAROLINE M. CRAVEN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE The above-referenced case was referred to -the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge for pre-trial purposes in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636. Before the Court are Plaintiffs Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. No. 46), Defendants’ response (Dkt. No. 51), and Plaintiffs,re-piy (Dkt.' No. 56).1
In re Fca U.S. LLCpublic domain
District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2019-05-01 · Published · cited 11× · 377 F. Supp. 3d 779
DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge Several putative class actions - some filed here, and others transferred to this district by the Panel on Multidistrict Litigation - have been consolidated in a Second Amended Master Class Action Complaint, alleging that defendant FCA US LLC (Chrysler) manufactured certain vehicles equipped with defective gear shifter mechanisms. The plaintiffs, alleging that they overpaid for their vehi