Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
3 opinions for “Advanced Video Technologies LLC v. Nikon Corporation”
In Re PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG LITIGATIONpublic domain
*24 OPINION RE: CAMERA MANUFACTURERS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NONIN-FRINGEMENT BASED ON THE LIMITATION OF AN “INPUT/OUTPUT [STORAGE] DEVICE CUSTOMARY IN A HOST DEVICE” ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge. Papst Licensing GmbH &am;
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.public domain
518 F.Supp.2d 1197 (2007) METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER STUDIOS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. GROKSTER, LTD. et al., Defendants. Jerry Leiber, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Consumer Empowerment BV, et al., Defendants. And Related Counterclaims. Nos. CV 01-8541 SVW (FMOx), CV 01-9923 SVW (FMOx). United States District Court, C.D. California. October 16, 2007.
Malletier v. Dooney & Bourke, Inc.public domain
525 F.Supp.2d 558 (2007) Louis Vuitton MALLETIER, Plaintiff, v. DOONEY & BOURKE, INC., Defendant. No. 04 Civ. 2990(SAS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. December 13, 2007. *559 *560 *561 Steven Kimelman, Esq., Michael A. Grow, Esq., Alison