Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
17 opinions for “Advantage Funding Commercial Capital Corp. v. Montano”
Argabright v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.public domain
AMENDED OPINION SIMANDLE, Chief Judge I. INTRODUCTION In this putative multistate class action, Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Rheem Manufacturing Company (“Rheem” or “Rheem Manufacturing”) manufactured defective residential heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (“HVAC”) systems under the Rheem and Ruud brand names. Plaintiffs in the proposed class consist of all individuals who purchased
Jury v. Jurypublic domain
I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document New Mexico Compilation Commission, Santa Fe, NM '00'04- 15:35:53 2017.04.13 IN TH
Jury v. Jurypublic domain
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO 2 Opinion Number: __________ 3 Filing Date: February 2, 2017 4 NOS. 34,257 and 34,564 (consolidated) 5 COLETTE C. JURY, 6 Petitioner-Appellant, 7 v. 8 VICTOR R. JURY, 9 Respondent-Appellee. 10 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 11 Deborah Davis Walker, District Judge 12 Caren I. Friedman 13 Santa Fe, NM 14 Bishop Law P.C. 15 Julie Bishop 16 Albuquerque, NM 17 for Appellant 18 Kerry Kierna
Sonne v. Board of Trustees of Village of Suffernpublic domain
OPINION OF THE COURT Chambers, J. After a protracted land-use dispute, the plaintiff commenced the instant action against the Village of Suffern (hereinafter the Village), its Board of Trustees, and certain village officials, inter alia, seeking damages for alleged violations of her constitutional rights to substantive and procedural due process, and of her right to be compensated for the taking of her prope
NO. 12-20-00246-CV IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT TYLER, TEXAS BAYLOR SCOTT & WHITE, § APPEAL FROM THE 7TH APPELLANT V. PROJECT ROSE MSO, LLC, § JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT TOUCHDOWN INTERCEPTION, LLC, INDIVIDUALLY AND DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF 62 ROSES, LLC, APPELLEES
State of Texas v. USApublic domain
JERRY E. SMITH, Circuit Judge: The United States1 appeals a preliminary injunction, pending trial, forbidding implementation of the Deferred Action for Parents of Americans -and Lawful Permanent Residents program (“DAPA”). Twenty-six states (the “states”2) challenged DAPA under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) and the Take Care Clause of the Constitution;
Brackeen v. Haalandpublic domain
Case: 18-11479 Document: 00515810731 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/06/2021 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED
United States v. Dish Network LLCpublic domain
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW Sue E. Myerscough, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE . This matter came before the Court on January 19, 2016, for a bench trial. The first phase of the bench trial was completed on February 17, 2016. The trial resumed, on October 26, 2016. The Court heard testimony on October 25-27, 2016 and November 2, 2016. The Plaintiff United States appeared by Assistant United States A
SWEPI, LP v. Mora Countypublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on SWEPI’s Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings, filed May 31, 2014 (Doc. 21)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on November 3, 2014. The primary issues are: (i) whether the Court may consider evidence outside the pleadings to determine issues of justiciability; (ii) whether Plaintiff
Francisco Calleja-Ahedo v. Compass Bankpublic domain
ACCEPTED 01-15-00210-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS
Rhue v. Dawsonpublic domain
AMENDED OPINION LANKFORD, Judge. Defendant John W. Dawson appeals from a judgment on a jury verdict in favor of plaintiff James P. Rhue and from the trial court’s order denying the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, to modify judgment or for a new trial. The jury awarded compensatory damages and punitive damages to Rhue on claims arising out of a joint
Nate D. Sanders, Inc. AND Baumgardner Funeral Home, Inc., and Allen S. Baumgardner, Sr. v. Robert Edward Lee Oswaldpublic domain
067-250449-11 FILED TARRANT COUNTY 4/30/2015 5:03:18 PM THOMAS A. WILDER CAUSE NO. 067-250449-11
McCauley v. Tom McCauley & Son, Inc.public domain
724 P.2d 232 (1986) 104 N.M. 523 LaVerne McCAULEY, Plaintiff-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. TOM McCAULEY & SON, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellants and Cross-Appellees. No. 7861. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. July 8, 1986. *233 Bryan L. Query, Bryan L. Query, P.A., Albuquerque, Daniel A. Dolan, Dan
ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV
ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV
ACCEPTED 13-15-00167-CV FILED THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS IN THE 13TH COURT OF APPEALS
ACCEPTED 07-15-00083-CV SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 9/9/2015 5:05:30 PM