Cases

AMAZON.COM, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentAmazon.com, Inc. v. Comm'rDocket No. 31197-12United States Tax Court

Per Curiam. A petition for rehearing en banc was filed by appellants Athena Diagnostics, Inc., Oxford University Innovation Ltd., and the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Forderung der Wissenschaften E.V. A response to the petition was invited by the court and filed by appellees Mayo Collaborative Services, LLC and Mayo Clinic. Several motions for leave to file amici curiae briefs were fi

OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO DISMISS MICHAEL H. SIMON, District Judge. This shareholder derivative action is brought by shareholders (“Plaintiffs”) of nominal defendant Galena Biopharma, Inc. (“Galena” or “Company”). Plaintiffs allege that certain members of Galena’s Board of Directors (“Board”) and executive officers of Galena (collectively, “Defendants”) breached their fiduciary duties and were unjustly

785 F.Supp.2d 1361 (2011) Vincent HAWKINS and Tammy Hawkins, Plaintiffs, v. COTTRELL, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 2:10-CV-00268-WCO. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Gainesville Division. May 19, 2011. *1363 Darl Champion, Michael J. Warshauer, Warshauer Law Group PC, Atlanta, GA, for Plaintiffs. Amy Loren

ON REHEARING PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1746 SD3, LLC; SAWSTOP LLC, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC.; BLACK & DECKER CORPORATION; CHANG TYPE INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.; DELTA POWER EQUIPMENT CORP.; HITACHI KOKI CO., LTD.; HITACHI KOKI USA LTD.; MAKITA CORPORATION; MAKITA U.

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1746 SD3, LLC; SAWSTOP LLC, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. BLACK & DECKER (U.S.) INC.; BLACK & DECKER CORPORATION; CHANG TYPE INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.; DELTA POWER EQUIPMENT CORP.; HITACHI KOKI CO., LTD.; HITACHI KOKI USA LTD.; MAKITA CORPORATION; MAKITA U.S.A., INC.; MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORP.; O

126 F.Supp.2d 69 (2001) AMGEN, INC., Plaintiff, v. HOECHST MARION ROUSSEL, INC. and Transkaryotic Therapies, Inc., Defendants. No. 97-10814-WGY. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. January 19, 2001. *70 *71 *72 *73<

Opinion for the court filed by Chief Judge PROST in which Circuit Judges NEWMAN, LOURIE, DYK, O’MALLEY, and REYNA join. Opinion concurring-in-part, dissenting-in-part filed by Circuit Judge HUGHES in which Circuit Judges MOORE, WALLACH, TARANTO, and CHEN join. *1315PROST, Chief Judge. We convene en banc to resolve whether, in light of the Supreme

449 F.Supp.2d 992 (2006) Barbara SCHWAB et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., Lorillard Tobacco Co., Ligget Group, Inc., American Tobacco Co., Altria Group, Inc., British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd., Defendants. No. 04-CV-1945(JBW). United States District Court

603 F.Supp.2d 274 (2009) HEARTS ON FIRE COMPANY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. BLUE NILE, INC., Defendant. Civ. Action No. 08cv11053-NG. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 27, 2009. *277 Leota L. Bates, Perkins Coie LLP, Washington, DC, Dennis N. D'Angelo, Mark S. Puzella, Goodwin Procter LLP, Boston, MA, Elizabeth L. McD

449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri

247 B.R. 51 (1999) In re ADLER, COLEMAN CLEARING CORP., Debtor. Edwin B. Mishkin, as SIPC Trustee for the Liquidation of the Business of Adler, Coleman Clearing Corp., Plaintiff, v. Daniel David Ensminger, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 95-08203 JLG. Adversary No. 97/8423A. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. December 15, 1999.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-13-00358-CV AEP Texas Commercial & Industrial Retail Limited Partnership, Appellant v. Public Utility Commission of Texas; Alliance for Retail Markets; Texas Energy Association for Marketers; CPL Retail Energy, LP; WTU Retail Energy, LP; and Direct Energy Business, LLC, Appellees FROM THE

820 F.Supp. 763 (1993) HOME SHOPPING CLUB, INC., Plaintiff, v. CHARLES OF THE RITZ GROUP, INC., Defendants. No. 92 Civ. 8173 (CSH). United States District Court, S.D. New York. May 7, 1993. *764 Kenyon & Kenyon (Edward T. Colbert, Andrea Schedt, Suzanne Parker, of counsel), Washington, DC, for plaintiff. Fish & Nea

518 F.Supp. 416 (1980) CROUSE-HINDS COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. INTERNORTH, INC. and I N Holdings, Inc., Defendants. No. 80-CV-772. United States District Court, N. D. New York. December 5, 1980. *417 *418 Hancock, Estabrook, Ryan, Shove & Hust, Syracuse, N. Y., Sullivan & Cromwell, New Yor

540 F.Supp. 951 (1982) WHITE AND WHITE, INC., Bluefield Supply Company, Crocker-Fels Co., and Ransdell Surgical Inc., Plaintiffs, v. AMERICAN HOSPITAL SUPPLY CORPORATION, Defendant. No. G79-633 CA1. United States District Court, W. D. Michigan, S. D. April 22, 1982. *952 *953

709 P.2d 265 (1985) UTAH COUNTY, a body politic, By and Through the COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION OF UTAH COUNTY, State of Utah, Plaintiff, v. INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTH CARE, INC., and Tax Commission of the State of Utah, Defendants. No. 17699. Supreme Court of Utah. June 26, 1985. Rehearing Denied September 26, 1985. *266

366 F.Supp. 374 (1973) TEXASGULF, INC., Plaintiff, v. CANADA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 73-H-1056. United States District Court, S. D. Texas, Houston Division. September 5, 1973. *375 *376 *377 *378

OPINION OF THE COURT ADAMS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs, the president of a corporation that deals in scientific instruments and the corporation itself, brought an antitrust suit alleging that the practices of a manufacturer had illegally restricted their business opportunities and ultimately resulted in the termination of the dealership, causing damages to bo

Lanteen Medical Laboratories, Inc., Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, RespondentLanteen Medical Laboratories, Inc. v. CommissionerDocket No. 12986United States Tax Court