Cases

40 F.3d 389 Aetna Casualtyv.Ward* NO. 93-6438 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. Nov 03, 1994 Appeal From: S.D.Ala., No. 92-00413-P-C 1 AFFIRMED.

USCA1 Opinion United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit ____________________ No. 95-1270 AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY CO. Plaintiff, Appellee, v.

USCA1 Opinion Can't open 93-1903

995 F.2d 221 Aetna Casualtyv.Secrest NO. 91-6355 United States Court of Appeals,Fifth Circuit. May 31, 1993 1 Appeal From: S.D.Tex. 2 REVERSED.

OPINION OF THE COURT Ritter, J. P. This appeal concerns the power of the respondents (hereinafter collectively Nassau County) to prohibit the petitioner, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (hereinafter Aetna), from acting as a surety on any competitively bid public contract in Nassau County during the period Aetna is in default on a surety bond. In 1992, Nassau County awarded a contract to

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, No. 97-1347 v. IND-COM ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert D. Potter, District Judge. (CA-96-241-3-P) Argued: October 27, 1997 Decided: March 23, 1998 Before RUSSELL,* MICHAEL, and MOTZ, C

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT Nos. 93-1877 93-1878 93-1879 93-1880 93-1881 93-2209 93-2300 AETNA CASUALTY SURETY COMPANY, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. P&B AUTOBODY, ET AL., Defendants - Appellees.

USCA1 Opinion UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT ____________________ Nos. 93-1877 93-1878 93-1879 93-1880 93-1881 93-2209 93-2300 AETNA

ORDER It is ORDERED that the motion for leave to appeal is denied.

JUSTICE LaVECCHIA delivered the opinion of the Court. This appeal requires us to settle whether this state adheres to the rule that an anti-assignment clause in an insurance policy may not bar the assignment of a post-loss claim even though the claim has not been reduced to a money judgment. An overwhelming number of jurisdictions around the country ac

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY APPELLATE DIVISION DOCKET NO. A-2270-12T4 GIVAUDAN FRAGRANCES CORPORATION, APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION Plaintiff-Appellant, August 12, 2015 v. APPELLATE DIVISION AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY CO

604 F.3d 625 (2010) Thomas P. ATHRIDGE, Sr. and Thomas P. Athridge, Jr., Appellants v. AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY CO., Appellee. No. 08-7145. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Argued October 16, 2009. Decided May 14, 2010. *627 Erik S. Jaffe argued the cause and filed the briefs for app

The plaintiff appeals from the denial of his 2016 motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Mass.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(4) and 60(b)(5), 365 Mass. 828 (1974). The motion sought relief from a 1994 order allowing the defendant's motion for relief from judgment and a subsequent 1996 order enforcing a settlement agreement.2 Two pri

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals Peter D. Protopapas, as Receiver for Starr Davis Company, Inc. and Starr Davis Company of S.C., Inc., Respondents, v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company f/k/a The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company; The Standard Fire Insurance Company; St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company; The Employers' Fire Insurance Company; Southeastern Agency Group and M.I.A. Company, Inc., individually and as successors to or f/k/a Merrimon In

585 F.Supp.2d 20 (2008) Thomas P. ATHRIDGE, et al., Plaintiff, v. AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 96-2708 (JMF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. November 10, 2008. *21 Michael H. Selter, Manelli Denison & Selter, PLLC, Charles Belsome Long, Collier Shannon Scott, PLLC, Erik S

510 F.Supp.2d 1 (2007) Thomas P. ATHRIDGE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 96-2708(JMF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. September 5, 2007. *2 Michael H. Selter, Manelli Denison & Selter, PLLC, Charles Belsome Long, Collier Shannon Scott, PLLC, William

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND § SURETY COMPANY (f/k/a Aetna § No. 88, 2026 Casualty and Surety Company), § § Court Below–Superior Court Defendant Below, § of the State of Delaware Appellant, § § C.A. No. N21C-05-143 v. § § SYNGENTA CROP PROTECTION, § LLC,

474 F.Supp.2d 102 (2007) Thomas P. ATHRIDGE, et al., Plaintiffs v. AETNA CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY, Defendant. Civ.A. 96-2708. United States District Court, District of Columbia. February 9, 2007. *103 Michael H. Selter, Manelli Denison & Selter, PLLC, Washington, DC, Erik Scott Jaffe, Erik Scott Jaffe, PC, Washington, DC,

Janet C. Hall, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Christopher Meidl ("Meidl") brings this class action against the defendants, Aetna, Inc. and Aetna Life Insurance Company (collectively, "Aetna"), for denying insurance coverage of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) as a treatment for depression. See generally Corrected Amended Class Action Complaint ("Corr.

Buffalo Emergency Assoc., LLP v Aetna Health, Inc. (2021 NY Slip Op 03690) Buffalo Emergency Assoc., LLP v Aetna Health, Inc. 2021 NY Slip Op 03690 Decided on June 11, 2021 Appellate Division, Fourth Department Publishe