Cases

FILED IN st 1 COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TX 12/07/2015 NO. CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE, CLERK IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FOR TH

685 F.Supp.2d 357 (2010) The State of NEW YORK, Plaintiff, v. SOLVENT CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC., and ICC Industries, Inc., Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. Olin Corporation and E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Third-Party Defendants. No. 83-CV-1401-JTC. United States District Court, W.D. New York. January 26, 2010. *361<

ACCEPTED 03-14-00738-CV 4853036 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXA

MOORE, District Judge: This case involves the addition of approximately 112,400 acres of land (“Addition Lands”) to the Big Cypress National Preserve in the State of Florida (“Original Preserve”). The Original Preserve was established by the Big Cypress National Preserve Act, 16 U.S.C. § 698f(a), and consists of over 574,000 acres. In 1988, Congress authorized the National Par

Filed 8/19/21 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT SAVE OUR ACCESS–SAN B303494 GABRIEL MOUNTAINS, Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 18STCP02984) v. WATERSHED CONSERVATION AUTHORITY, Defendant and Appellant. SAVE OUR ACCESS—SAN B307

USCA11 Case: 18-14515 Date Filed: 06/08/2021 Page: 1 of 136 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 18-14515 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 9:17-cv-81152-BB DONALD BURNS,

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 19-1582 19-1625 UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. NIA MOORE-BUSH, a/k/a Nia Dinzey, Defendant, Appellee. Nos. 19-1583 19-1626 UNITED STATES, Appellant, v. DAPHNE MOORE

OPINION AND ORDER JOHN E. STEELE, District Judge. For the third time since 1995, the issue of the use of motorized recreational off-road vehicles (ORVs) in the Big Cypress National Preserve is before the Court. The first case2, initiated by environmental interests, resulted in a Settlement Agreement, while the second3, initiated by ORV

Johanson, J. ¶1 The subject of this appeal is the Western Washington Growth Management Hearings Board’s (Board) final decision and order that upheld Jefferson County’s 2014 Shoreline Master Program. Olympic Stewardship Foundation (OSF), Citizens’ Alliance for Property Rights Jefferson County (CAPR) et al., and Hood Canal Sand and Gravel (S&G) appeal various aspects of the Board’s

*781FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW WAVERLY D. CRENSHAW, JR., CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The Tennessee Clean Water Network and Tennessee Scenic Rivers Association (“Plaintiffs”) filed a Complaint against the Tennessee Valley Authority (“TVA”) alleging numerous violations of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”) related to TVA’s operation of a

OPINION AND ORDER SWEENEY, Judge. Before the court are Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint for Failure to State a Claim (“motion”) and Plaintiffs’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment on Partial Liability (“cross-motion”). In this action, plaintiffs Love Terminal Partners, L.P. and Virginia Aerospace, LLC (“Love Terminal Partners” and “Virginia Aerospace,” respectively; “plaintiffs

PER CURIAM: This case comes before the court on plaintiffs’ exceptions to the recommended decision of Trial Judge C. Murray Bernhardt, filed August 10, 1979, pursuant to Rule 134(h), and on plaintiffs’ motion, filed April 21, 1980, for partial remand, having been submitted to the court on the briefs and oral argument of counsel. Upon consideration thereof, since the court agrees with the trial judge’s recommended decision, as he

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT SOUTHERN UTAH WILDERNESS ALLIANCE, a Utah non-profit corporation, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. 04-4071 & 04-4073 BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, Defendant-Appellee, TYLER LEWIS, in his official capacity as San Juan County Commissioner, et al., Defendants-Appellants, and NORMAN CARROLL, et al., Defendants. _____________________

OPINION 1 HEWITT, Chief Judge. This is an action for just compensation filed by owners of property along the eastern shore of Lake Michigan. Plaintiffs’ properties are located along an area of the shoreline that erodes naturally, but allege that the government’s construction and maintenance of a pair of jetties effected a taking by speeding the erosion of

746 F.Supp.2d 1055 (2009) CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, et al., Plaintiffs, v. U.S. BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, et al., Defendants. No. C 06-4884 SI. United States District Court, N.D. California. September 28, 2009. *1058 Matthew Ellis Bostick, Farella Braun Martel, Lisa T. Belenky, San Francisco,

OPINION AND ORDER JOHN E. STEELE, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on five cross motions for summary judgment in these consolidated cases. Then-magistrate judge Sheri Polster Chappell filed a seventy-nine page Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 123)1 on January 31, 2013, recommending that Plaintiffs’ motions be denied and Defendants’ motions be gran

McCONNELL, Circuit Judge. This case involves one of the more contentious land use issues in the West: the legal status of claims by local governments to rights of way for the construction of highways across federal lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). In 1866, Congress passed an open-ended grant of “the right of way for the construction of highways over public lands, not reserved for public uses.” Act of Jul

762 F.Supp. 1558 (1991) The NATION MAGAZINE (a/k/a The Nation Company, Inc.), Harper's Magazine, In These Times (a/k/a The Institute for Public Affairs, Inc.), Pacific News Service (a/k/a Bay Area Institute, Inc.), The Guardian (a/k/a Institute for Independent Social Journalism, Inc.), The Progressive Magazine (a/k/a The Progressive, Inc.), Mother Jones Magazine (a/k/a Foundation for National Progress, Inc.), The L.A. Weekly (a/k/a Los Angeles Weekly, In

OPINION LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. Editor Note: The paragraphs related to headnotes 1-105 are found on the supplemental pieces of this opinion on Westlaw. Part 1 is 2014 WL 815553; Part 2 is 2014 WL 815613; Part 3 is 2014 WL 815715; Part 4 is 2014 WL 815869 [Head-notes 1-2]; Part 5 is 2014 WL 815923 [Headnotes 3-51]; Part 6 is 2014 WL 815961 [Headnotes 52-87]; Part 7 is 2014 WL 816086 [Headnotes 88-

INTERIM REPORT REGARDING S. 794 “A BILL FOR THE RELIEF OF LAND GRANTORS IN HENDERSON, UNION, AND WEBSTER COUNTIES, KENTUCKY, AND THEIR HEIRS” AND MEMORANDUM OPINION BRADEN, Judge. Shortly after the onset of World War II, the United States (“Government”) acquired approximately 35,849.28 acres of land in the counties of Henderson, Union, and Webster, Kentucky to establish an Army training facility, that later