⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Aguilar v. Torres”

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024-10-28 · Published · cited 1× · 130 F.4th 450
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ___________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit No. 23-50866 FILED October 28, 2024 ___________
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024-09-09 · Published · cited 2× · 116 F.4th 341
Case: 23-50866 RESTRICTED Document: 50-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/09/2024 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2025-02-26 · Published · cited 0×
Case: 23-50866 Document: 114-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/25/2025 United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit ____________ FILED
Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007-10-16 · Published · cited 0× · 141 Wash. App. 1009
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Clark County, No. 06-1-01154-6, John F. Nichols, J., entered February 2, 2007. Remanded by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Houghton, C.J., and Bridge-water, J.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004-01-16 · Published · cited 30× · 352 F.3d 934; 2003 WL 22853762
PER CURIAM: Defendant Augstin Torres-Aguilar pleaded guilty to illegally reentering the United States after previously having been deported, see 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) (2000), and was sentenced to 250 days imprisonment, time served, and one year of supervised release. Torres-Aguilar appeals the district court’s judgment, arguing that it improperly included a specia
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001-04-23 · Published · cited 583× · 246 F.3d 1267; 2001 Daily Journal DAR 3925; 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3155; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 7368
THOMAS, Circuit Judge: We consider in this appeal the scope of our review of due process claims under section 309(c)(4)(E) of the transitional rules of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (“IIRIRA”). In this case, because Torres-Aguilar has failed to allege a colorable due process claim, we dismiss his petition for review for lack of jurisdi
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-02-28 · Published · cited 0× · 543 U.S. 1194; 125 S. Ct. 1416; 73 U.S.L.W. 3513; 161 L. Ed. 2d 202; 2005 U.S. LEXIS 2193
543 U.S. 1194 AGUILAR-GARCIAv.UNITED STATESBRACEROLEMUSv.UNITED STATESCENTENO-SANCHEZv.UNITED STATESESPARZA-ROBLESv.UNITED STATESGONZALEZ-VALLEJOv.UNITED STATESMENDIETA-GOMEZv.UNITED STATESNAVA-ALVAREZv.UNITED STATESDELGADO-PEREZv.UNITED STATESTORRES-PESINAv.UNITED STATESRODRIGUEZ-PUENTEv.UNITED STATESSANTOS-SALINASv.UNITE
Supreme Court of the United States · 2005-01-10 · Published · cited 0× · 543 U.S. 1073; 125 S. Ct. 926; 160 L. Ed. 2d 811; 73 U.S.L.W. 3399; 2005 U.S. LEXIS 182
*1073(Reported below: 105 Fed. Appx. 618); (105 Fed. Appx. 618); (105 *1074Fed. Appx. 621); (106 Fed. Appx. 918); (105 Fed. Appx. 619); (105 Fed. Appx. 613); (105 Fed. Appx. 627); (105 Fed. Appx. 612); (105
Aguilar v. Eickpublic domain
Connecticut Appellate Court · 2025-08-12 · Published · cited 3× · 234 Conn. App. 281
************************************************ The “officially released” date that appears near the beginning of an opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it is released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for the filing of postopin- ion motions and petitions for certification is the “offi- cially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical cor
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-11-04 · Published · cited 0× · 537 U.S. 1010; 123 S. Ct. 505
537 U.S. 1010 AGUILAR-MORENOv.UNITED STATES;ALVAREZ-BLANCOv.UNITED STATES;DE LA CRUZ-HERNANDEZv.UNITED STATES;RODARTE-RODRIGUEZv.UNITED STATES;RAMOS-HIPOLITO, AKA RAMOSv.UNITED STATES; andHERRERA-TORRES, AKA LOPEZ AYALAv.UNITED STATES. No. 02-6461. Supreme Court of United States. November 4, 2002.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2002-11-04 · Published · cited 0× · 537 U.S. 1010
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 45 Fed. Appx. 321 (second, fifth, and sixth judgments) and 322 (first, third, and fourth judgments).
Supreme Court of the United States · 2001-10-01 · Published · cited 0× · 534 U.S. 939; 13 F. App'x 541; 122 S. Ct. 314
*939(Reported below: 10 Fed. Appx. 608); *940(13 Fed. Appx. 541); (20 Fed. Appx. 609); C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2007-10-11 · Published · cited 60× · 242 S.W.3d 553; 2007 Tex. App. LEXIS 8499; 2007 WL 2965779
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 555 OPINION Carlos Torres appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of GSC Enterprises, Inc., a Texas Corporation, and Terry Harbin, Individually and as Agent for GSC Enterprises, Inc., a Texas Corporation. Finding no error, we affirm. FA
State v. Aguilarpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Utah · 2022-08-04 · Published · cited 2× · 516 P.3d 768; 2022 UT App 97
2022 UT App 97 THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF UTAH, Appellee, v. JESUS AGUILAR JR., Appellant. Opinion No. 20190980-CA Filed August 4, 2022 Third District Court, Salt Lake Department The Honorable Amber M. Mettler
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022-03-29 · Published · cited 9× · 29 F.4th 1208
Appellate Case: 18-9570 Document: 010110663824 Date Filed: 03/29/2022 Page: 1 FILED United States Court of PUBLISH Appeals Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-06-21 · Published · cited 0× · 542 U.S. 930
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Supreme Court of the United States · 2004-06-21 · Published · cited 0× · 542 U.S. 930; 124 S. Ct. 2900
C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Tribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico · 2007-12-10 · Published · cited 0× · 13 T.C.A. 704; 2008 DTA 14
Escribano Medina, Juez Ponente *705TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA RESOLUCIÓN Comparece ante nos, Irma Calero Aguilar (en adelante la peticionaria), solicitando la revisión de una sentencia dictada por el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de Caguas (Hon. Ayxa Rey Díaz, J.), emitida el 16 de marzo de 2007, archivada en autos copia de su notificación el
Torres v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Texas · 1996-10-31 · Published · cited 1× · 933 S.W.2d 339; 1996 Tex. App. LEXIS 4808; 1996 WL 631349
OPINION This appeal arises from a conviction for aggravated sexual assault, aggravated robbery, and auto theft. After the trial court denied appellant's motion to suppress, he pleaded guilty to all three offenses. The court sentenced him to ten years confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice for the theft, and forty years confinement for the other two offenses. Appellant contends in a single point of error t
State v. Aguilarpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2016-02-26 · Published · cited 2× · 52 Kan. App. 2d 466; 367 P.3d 324; 2016 Kan. App. LEXIS 13
Walker, J.: A jury convicted Gabriel A. Aguilar- of three counts of aggravated indecent liberties with a child and one count of sexual exploitation of a child. On appeal, Aguilar contends his convictions should be reversed because the jury instruction on multiple *467 acts was clearly erroneous. In part