Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
13 opinions for “Ahlgren v. Berg”
Lindner v. Ahlgrenpublic domain
477 P.2d 219 (1970) Tina LINDNER, Appellant, v. Vernon AHLGREN, Respondent. Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc. Argued and Submitted June 3, 1970. Decided November 25, 1970. Frank H. Hilton, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Dwight L. Schwab and Hutchinson, Schwab & Burdick, Portland. Melvin Kosta, Klamath Falls, argu
Folsom v. City of Livingstonpublic domain
09/20/2016 DA 15-0499 Case Number: DA 15-0499 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2016 MT 238 DAVID W. FOLSOM and ALANA L. FOLSOM, Plaintiffs, Appellants, and Cross-Appellees, v. CITY OF LIVINGSTON, a po
State v. Arsenaultpublic domain
Galway, J. The defendant, Christopher W. Arsenault, appeals an order of the Merrimack District Court {Michael, J.) denying his motion to vacate a prior conviction. We reverse. The parties do not dispute the material facts in this case. In March 2001, Arsenault was charged with driving while intoxicated (DWI) in violation of *415RSA 265:82. The
Miller v. Ford Motor Co.public domain
152 F.Supp.2d 1046 (2001) Gary MILLER, Plaintiff, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant. No. 01 C 0204. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 17, 2001. *1047 Keith L. Hunt, Keith L. Hunt & Assoc., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Timothy Ray, Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg, Chicago, IL, Stephen M. Ble
Jordan v. Knafelpublic domain
823 N.E.2d 1113 (2005) 355 Ill. App.3d 534 291 Ill.Dec. 527 Michael JORDAN, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. Karla KNAFEL, Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee. No. 1-03-2152. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fourth Division. February 3, 2005.
E.K.D. ex rel. Dawes v. Facebook, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MURPHY, District Judge: I. Introduction This case is before the Court on the motion to transfer brought by Defendant Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”) (Doc. 57). Plaintiffs E.K.D., by her next friend Melissa K. Dawes, and C.M.D., by his next friend Jennifer E. Deyong, who bring this action individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, h
State v. Johnsonpublic domain
BUTTLER, P. J. Defendant appeals his conviction for carrying a concealed weapon, ORS 166.240, after a trial to the court on stipulated facts following the denial of his motion to suppress. He assigns error to the denial of that motion. We reverse. Officer Main was on patrol in Myrtle Creek at 5:50 a.m., in December, 1988, when he saw a car being driven by defendant. He recognized neither the car nor the driv
Bank of America, N.A. v. Veluchamy (In re Veluchamy)public domain
Corrected Amended Memorandum of Decision on the Entry of Final Judgment and Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law EUGENE R. WEDOFF, Bankruptcy Judge. This adversary proceeding, filed in a voluntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy case, is before the court for decision after trial. The debtors in the bankruptcy case are a married couple who owned and operated several successful businesses. One of their bus
American Country Insurance Co. v. Clinepublic domain
SIXTH DIVISION December 10, 1999 No. 1-98-2021 AMERICAN COUNTRY INSURANCE COMPANY, ) Appeal from the
American Country Insurance v. Clinepublic domain
722 N.E.2d 755 (1999) 309 Ill. App.3d 501 242 Ill.Dec. 971 AMERICAN COUNTRY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert CLINE, Defendant (Pepper Construction Company of Illinois and Anderson Consulting Company, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees). No. 1-98-2021. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Sixth Division. De
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge. Plaintiff brought this action against a large number of defendants alleging liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act, (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-75, and the Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability Act (MERLA), Minn.Stat. §§ 115B.01-.37. Many defendants impleaded third-party defendants. Juri
California Family Bioethics Council, LLC v. California Institute for Regenerative Medicinepublic domain
55 Cal.Rptr.3d 272 (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 1319 CALIFORNIA FAMILY BIOETHICS COUNCIL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE et al., Defendants and Respondents. People's Advocate et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Independent Citizen's Oversight Committee et al., Defendants and Respondents. Nos. A114195, A114282. Court of Appeal o
Sylvester Bros. Dev. Co. v. Burlington Northernpublic domain
772 F.Supp. 443 (1990) SYLVESTER BROTHERS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD, Metal-Matic, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. ABBOTT NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL, Moorhead Machinery & Boiler Company, et al., Third-Party Defendants. Civ. No. 4-88-692. United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division. September 11,