⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

13 opinions for “Ahlgren v. Berg”

Lindner v. Ahlgrenpublic domain
Oregon Supreme Court · 1970-11-25 · Published · cited 3× · 477 P.2d 219; 257 Or. 127; 1970 Ore. LEXIS 255
477 P.2d 219 (1970) Tina LINDNER, Appellant, v. Vernon AHLGREN, Respondent. Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc. Argued and Submitted June 3, 1970. Decided November 25, 1970. Frank H. Hilton, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Dwight L. Schwab and Hutchinson, Schwab & Burdick, Portland. Melvin Kosta, Klamath Falls, argu
Montana Supreme Court · 2016-09-20 · Published · cited 6× · 2016 MT 238; 385 Mont. 20; 381 P.3d 539; 2016 Mont. LEXIS 820
09/20/2016 DA 15-0499 Case Number: DA 15-0499 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2016 MT 238 DAVID W. FOLSOM and ALANA L. FOLSOM, Plaintiffs, Appellants, and Cross-Appellees, v. CITY OF LIVINGSTON, a po
State v. Arsenaultpublic domain
Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2006-04-25 · Published · cited 3× · 153 N.H. 413; 897 A.2d 988; 2006 N.H. LEXIS 43
Galway, J. The defendant, Christopher W. Arsenault, appeals an order of the Merrimack District Court {Michael, J.) denying his motion to vacate a prior conviction. We reverse. The parties do not dispute the material facts in this case. In March 2001, Arsenault was charged with driving while intoxicated (DWI) in violation of *415RSA 265:82. The
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001-07-17 · Published · cited 6× · 152 F. Supp. 2d 1046; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10001; 2001 WL 811128
152 F.Supp.2d 1046 (2001) Gary MILLER, Plaintiff, v. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, Defendant. No. 01 C 0204. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 17, 2001. *1047 Keith L. Hunt, Keith L. Hunt & Assoc., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Timothy Ray, Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg, Chicago, IL, Stephen M. Ble
Jordan v. Knafelpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005-02-03 · Published · cited 25× · 823 N.E.2d 1113; 355 Ill. App. 3d 534; 291 Ill. Dec. 527; 2005 Ill. App. LEXIS 73
823 N.E.2d 1113 (2005) 355 Ill. App.3d 534 291 Ill.Dec. 527 Michael JORDAN, Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant-Appellee and Cross-Appellant, v. Karla KNAFEL, Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee. No. 1-03-2152. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fourth Division. February 3, 2005.
District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2012-03-08 · Published · cited 4× · 885 F. Supp. 2d 894; 2012 WL 3242392; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113761
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MURPHY, District Judge: I. Introduction This case is before the Court on the motion to transfer brought by Defendant Facebook, Inc. (“Facebook”) (Doc. 57). Plaintiffs E.K.D., by her next friend Melissa K. Dawes, and C.M.D., by his next friend Jennifer E. Deyong, who bring this action individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, h
State v. Johnsonpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1991-03-20 · Published · cited 0× · 106 Or. App. 371; 808 P.2d 718; 1991 Ore. App. LEXIS 464
BUTTLER, P. J. Defendant appeals his conviction for carrying a concealed weapon, ORS 166.240, after a trial to the court on stipulated facts following the denial of his motion to suppress. He assigns error to the denial of that motion. We reverse. Officer Main was on patrol in Myrtle Creek at 5:50 a.m., in December, 1988, when he saw a car being driven by defendant. He recognized neither the car nor the driv
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2014-12-18 · Published · cited 6× · 524 B.R. 277; 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 5106
Corrected Amended Memorandum of Decision on the Entry of Final Judgment and Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law EUGENE R. WEDOFF, Bankruptcy Judge. This adversary proceeding, filed in a voluntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy case, is before the court for decision after trial. The debtors in the bankruptcy case are a married couple who owned and operated several successful businesses. One of their bus
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999-12-10 · Published · cited 0×
SIXTH DIVISION December 10, 1999 No. 1-98-2021 AMERICAN COUNTRY INSURANCE COMPANY, ) Appeal from the
Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999-12-10 · Published · cited 39× · 722 N.E.2d 755; 309 Ill. App. 3d 501; 242 Ill. Dec. 971; 1999 Ill. App. LEXIS 853
722 N.E.2d 755 (1999) 309 Ill. App.3d 501 242 Ill.Dec. 971 AMERICAN COUNTRY INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert CLINE, Defendant (Pepper Construction Company of Illinois and Anderson Consulting Company, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees). No. 1-98-2021. Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Sixth Division. De
District Court, D. Minnesota · 1990-09-11 · Published · cited 0× · 772 F. Supp. 443; 22 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20594; 32 ERC (BNA) 1122; 1990 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15115
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge. Plaintiff brought this action against a large number of defendants alleging liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act, (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-75, and the Minnesota Environmental Response and Liability Act (MERLA), Minn.Stat. §§ 115B.01-.37. Many defendants impleaded third-party defendants. Juri
California Court of Appeal · 2007-02-26 · Published · cited 4× · 55 Cal. Rptr. 3d 272; 147 Cal. App. 4th 1319
55 Cal.Rptr.3d 272 (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 1319 CALIFORNIA FAMILY BIOETHICS COUNCIL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE FOR REGENERATIVE MEDICINE et al., Defendants and Respondents. People's Advocate et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Independent Citizen's Oversight Committee et al., Defendants and Respondents. Nos. A114195, A114282. Court of Appeal o
District Court, D. Minnesota · 1990-09-11 · Published · cited 14× · 772 F. Supp. 443
772 F.Supp. 443 (1990) SYLVESTER BROTHERS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD, Metal-Matic, Inc., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. ABBOTT NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL, Moorhead Machinery & Boiler Company, et al., Third-Party Defendants. Civ. No. 4-88-692. United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Fourth Division. September 11,