Cases

WEIMER, J., would grant. CLARK, J., would grant.

Judge Terri F. Love Yvonne Ainsworth ("Ms. Ainsworth"), individually and on behalf of her deceased mother, Ms. Sylvia Taylor ("Ms. Taylor"), filed the instant lawsuit, alleging that the conditions at Touro Infirmary ("Touro") during Hurricane Katrina caused or contributed to the injuries Ms. Taylor sustained while under its care. Ms. Ainsworth seeks appellate review of the trial court's granting of summary judgment in favor of Touro

CROW, Judge. On April 4, 1991, at the instance of Sandra Ann Ainsworth (“Sandra”), a garnishment was issued against the wages of her ex-husband, Jimmy Ray Fry (“Jim”), to collect allegedly delinquent child support which, with interest, totaled $8,157.40. Jim moved to quash the garnishment, averring that by reason of an agreement in October, 1981, the sum claimed by Sandra exceeded the amount due and Sandra’s claim was barred

Ryan, C. There has already been a description of the issues involved in this case upon a former consideration thereof on a petition in error. (Taylor v. Ainsworth, 49 Neb. 696.) There has now been another trial of these issues in the district court of Douglas county which resulted in a similar judgment to that already reversed, and the defendant again seeks a reversal; this time, however, by appeal. We have carefull

Appeal from County Court, Madison County; Roy H. Montgomery, Judge. Before WALKER, P.J., HAWKINS and DAN M. LEE, JJ. AFFIRMED EN BANC.

MEMORANDUM OPINION JAMES C. CACHERIS, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on Motions to Dismiss [Dkts. 11, 18] filed by Defendant Loudon County School Board (“LCSB”) and Defendants Paul Webb, Jill Broaddus, Mary Kearney, Delores Creech, and Brian Peppiat (the “Individual Defendants”) (collectively “Defendants”).1 For the following reasons, the Court wi

GRABER, Circuit Judge, dissenting: I respectfully dissent. A previous panel of this court already has held that Petitioner failed to prove that defense counsel was ineffective at the guilt phase of this trial. Ainsworth v. Calderon, 138 F.3d 787 (9th Cir.), amended by 152 F.3d 1223 (9th Cir.1998). In my view, the same result should obtain with respect to the penalty phase. Petitioner did not

268 F.3d 868 (9th Cir. 2001) STEVEN KING AINSWORTH, PETITIONER-APPELLEE-CROSS-APPELLANT,v.JEANNE WOODFORD, ACTING WARDEN OF CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON AT SAN QUENTIN, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT-CROSS-APPELLEE. Nos. 99-99024, 99-99026 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Argued and Submitted July 12, 2001Filed September 28, 2001

I,BROWN, J. Plaintiff, Bobby Ray Ainsworth, has appealed the trial court’s dismissal of his medical malpractice action against defendants, Dr. Brian Bulloch and St. Francis Medical Center, as untimely. We affirm. Factual and Procedural Background Plaintiff, a 41-year-old-man, injured his back in a job-related accident in 1995. Previously, in 1990, he had a decompres-sive lam

50 F.Supp.2d 588 (1999) ROWAN COMPANIES, INC. v. Larry D. AINSWORTH. No. Civ.A. 97-1149. United States District Court, W.D. Louisiana, Alexandria Division. March 8, 1999. *589 David A Hurlburt, George D. Ernest, III, Hurlburt Privat & Monrose, Lafayette, LA, for Rowan Companies Inc., plaintiff. Howard N Nugent, Jr., D.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2017-KA-00838-COA RODERICK TAYLOR A/K/A RODRICK APPELLANT TAYLOR A/K/A RODERICK KENYATTA TAYLOR SR. A/K/A GEORGE WILSON A/K/A RODERICK FLINSTONE TAYLOR A/K/A RODERICK K. TAYLOR A/K/A RODERICK KENYATTA TAYLOR A/K/A RODRICK K. TAYLOR v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT:

Rel: December 8, 2023 STATE OF ALABAMA -- JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT THE SUPREME COURT OCTOBER TERM, 2023-2024 SC-2023-0334 Matthew Sherman Phillips v. Governor Kay Ivey; Lieutenant Governor Will Ainsworth; Attorney General Steve Marshall; Secretary of State Wes Allen; Chief Justice Tom Parker; Rich Hobson, Director of the Administrative Office of Courts; Hal Taylor, Secretary of the Alabama Law Enforcement Agency; Maury Mitchell, Director

539 F.Supp. 593 (1982) Ainsworth C. JACKSON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Patricia TAYLOR, et al., Defendants. Civ. A. No. 82-0905. United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 24, 1982. *594 Ainsworth C. Jackson et al., pro se. Robert J. Harlan, Jr., Asst. Corp. Counsel, District of Columbia, Washington, D. C., for d

OPINION OF THE COURT Wallace, J. Defendant, nearly 80 years old, stands convicted, following his fourth trial, of murder in the second degree and is now serving an indeterminate sentence of from 15 years to life. He does not dispute that sufficient evidence was produced by the People to show that after a series of petty thefts and other provocations committed at their common residence by his former subtenant

630 So.2d 1145 (1993) MERRILL LYNCH, PIERCE, FENNER, AND SMITH, INC., Petitioners, v. Francis E. AINSWORTH; Patrick Albert; Harold O. and Evelyn M. Bailey; Raymond J. Brown; Carole K. Costa; Eugene W. Garges, Jr.; and Howard Goldstein, M.D.; Byron S. and Rita M. Hancock; Patsy Kay Jackson, Trustee; Hugh J. Lattomus, Trustee; M. Lewis Laurence and Marlene J. Laurence, Trustees; Harold W. Talbott, Trustee; and Jack A. Taylor, Respondents.

Ryan, C. Tbe defendant in error, in bis petition in tbe district court of Douglas county, alleged that be bad qualified as executor of tbe estate of Mary E. Johnson, wbo bad died in Monroe county, Michigan, and that tbe plaintiff in error was in possession of $1,000 of tbe property of tbe testatrix. As grounds for equitable relief it was alleged by tbe executor in bis petition that Joseph H. Taylor bad possessed tbe implicit

785 P.2d 417 (1990) Stuart H. STAKER, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Noal D. AINSWORTH, Juanita Ainsworth Fox, David Ainsworth, Lynn Ainsworth, Jean Ainsworth, Jack Ainsworth, Beth Ainsworth, Freedom Yocum, Jr., Edna Yocum, Robert J. Holmes, Grant S. Jensen, Paul E. Holmes, Bruce E. Holmes, Helen Holmes, James Roger Shane and Elfriede Shane, Defendants and Appellees. Noal D. AINSWORTH, Juanita Ainsworth Fox, David Ainsworth, Lynn Ainsworth, Jean

PER CURIAM: This suit involves a judgment that the United States obtained against appellant Warren Taylor and another for the unpaid balance on a promissory note that the Small Business Administration (SBA) had guaranteed. Although not raised by the parties, the dispositive issue in this case is whether an appeal properly lies befo

Immediately prior to the transaction here directly involved, F.M. Leverette had been having some difficulties which had incited him to shift his bank accounts, and which culminated in his making a deposit on December 11, 1943, in the Grenada Trust Banking Company of $5,100 to the credit of his mother, the appellant here. The deposit slip which evidenced this deposit showed that the deposit was to the credit of Mrs. Annie C. Leverette, but it bore the notation on its face made by the cashier

521 So.2d 1272 (1987) Celia Tullos AINSWORTH, Sadie Ainsworth Smith, William Wiley Magee, Billy Charles Magee, Joe Allen Magee, Paul Arnold Magee, and Martha Ann Magee Stubbs v. CALLON PETROLEUM COMPANY, System Fuels, Inc., Comprehensive Resources Corp., and Brighthaven Exploration Partners. No. 57095. Supreme Court of Mississippi. November 18, 1987. As Modifie