Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Akers v. Overland”
United States v. Akerspublic domain
*1093 ALARCÓN, Circuit Judge. Montgomery C. Akers (“Akers”) appeals from the judgment of conviction of fourteen counts of bank fraud and one count of uttering and possessing a counterfeit security with intent to deceive. 1 Akers argues that he
Adler Upholstery Fabrics v. Akers Motor Lines, Inc.public domain
Robert V. Sabatini, J. The only issue raised by the defendant is whether the plaintiff filed a proper claim within the nine months from the date of shipment or within nine months after a reasonable time for delivery has elapsed as required by the stipulation on the bill of-lading. If such a claim was not filed, plaintiff’s right of recovery would have to be denied.
Kustom Signals, Inc. v. Applied Concepts, Inc.public domain
247 F.Supp.2d 1233 (2003) KUSTOM SIGNALS, INC., Plaintiff, v. APPLIED CONCEPTS, INC. and John L. Aker, Defendants. No. CIV.A.96-2296-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. March 4, 2003. *1234 D.A.N. Chase, Ginnie C. Derusseau, Michael Yakimo, Jr., Chase Law Firm, LC, Overland Park, KS, for Plaintiff. Douglas R. Ric
Kustom Signals, Inc. v. Applied Concepts, Inc.public domain
52 F.Supp.2d 1260 (1999) KUSTOM SIGNALS, INC., Plaintiff, v. APPLIED CONCEPTS, INC. and John L. Aker, Defendants. No. CIV. A. 96-2296-KHV. United States District Court, D. Kansas. June 13, 1999. As Amended June 29, 1999. *1261 *1262 Michael Yakimo, Jr., D. A. N. Chase, Ginnie
Kustom Signals, Inc. v. Applied Concepts, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER EARL E. O’CONNOR, District Judge. This matter is before the court on plaintiffs motion for reconsideration of partial summary judgment and for sanctions (Doc. # 75). After careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and submissions, the court is now prepared to rule. For the reasons set forth below, plaintiffs motion for reconsideration will be denied and plaintiffs motion fo
264 F.3d 1326 (Fed. Cir. 2001) KUSTOM SIGNALS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,v.APPLIED CONCEPTS, INC. and JOHN L. AKER, Defendants-Appellees. No. 99-1564 United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit DECIDED: September 5, 2001 Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Kansas Judge Kath
Kustom Signals, Inc. v. Applied Concepts, Inc.public domain
995 F.Supp. 1229 (1998) KUSTOM SIGNALS, INC., Plaintiff, v. APPLIED CONCEPTS, INC., and John L. Aker, Defendants. Civil Action No. 96-2296-EEO. United States District Court, D. Kansas. February 9, 1998. *1230 *1231 Michael Yakimo, Jr., D.A.N. Chase, Ginnie C. Derusseau, Chase & Yakimo, Ove
Wile v. Donovanpublic domain
TITUS, Judge. Plaintiffs sued in equity to have a warranty deed absolute on its face declared a mortgage and to require defendant to convey the subject real estate to plaintiffs upon payment of the sum the court found due. The chancellor obliged plaintiffs as prayed, and after two prior unsuccessful attempts to perfect an appeal [Wile v. Donovan, 514 S.W.2d 177 (Mo.App.1974) and 532 S.W.2d 891 (Mo.App.1976)], defend
Ramsey v. Greenbush Logistics, Inc.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Greenbush Logistics, Inc.’s (‘Greenbush') Motion to. Dismiss, or in the Alternative, to Transfer Amended Complaint (Doc. -No. 23), to which Billy Paul Ramsey has responded in opposition (Doc. No. 27) and Greenbush has replied (Doc. No. 40). For the reasons that follow, the Motion will be granted insofar as Greenbush requests a transfer of this action. I. Factual Backgroun
Wile v. Donovanpublic domain
PER CURIAM: The appeal in Wile v. Donovan, 514 S.W.2d 177 (Mo.App.1974) was dismissed for “failure of the judgment [entered September 24, 1973] to dispose of the issues between the plaintiffs and defendant Jack Donovan.” Thereafter the parties repaired to the circuit court, plaintiffs filed a motion for leave “to Dismiss their cause of action against Defendant Jack Donovan,” and the court obliged via order filed Janu
Wildman v. Am. Century Servs., LLCpublic domain
GREG KAYS, CHIEF JUDGE This case involves claims for breach of fiduciary duty and prohibited transactions pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"), 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. Plaintiffs Steve Wildman ("Wildman") and Jon Borcherding ("Borcherding"), participants in the America
McGhee v. W.R. Grace & Co.public domain
312 S.W.3d 447 (2010) David G. McGHEE, Employee-Appellant/Respondent, v. W.R. GRACE & CO., Employer-Respondent/Cross-Appellant. Nos. SD 30060, SD 30065. Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District, Division One. May 28, 2010. *449 R. David Ray, West Plains, MO, for Appellant. Jennifer Arnett, Overland Park, KS, for Re
Hadder v. Heritage Hill Manor, Inc.public domain
KENNETH S. HIXSON, Judge | Appellant Sandra Hadder filed a complaint in the Circuit Court of Phillips County, Arkansas, seeking damages for personal injuries that she allegedly sustained as the result of a slip and fall in an apartment owned by Heritage Hill Manor, Inc. (“Heritage”). Appellant appeals the entry of summary judgment and the dism
Crow v. Kansas City Power & Light Co.public domain
174 S.W.3d 523 (2005) Betty CROW, et al., Appellant, v. KANSAS CITY POWER & LIGHT COMPANY, et al., Defendants, Crico of Ethans II and Equity Residential Properties Management Corp.; Mayfield Enterprises, Respondents. No. WD 64229. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. July 5, 2005. Application for Rehearing and/or Transfer Denied August 30, 2005.
(2008) ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, as subrogee of Movers, Inc., Plaintiff, v. DELTA AIR LINES, INC., Defendant. No. 07 Civ.1912(GWG). United States District Court, S.D. New York. October 10, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, United States Magistrate Judge. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company ("St.Pau
Gauger v. Statepublic domain
249 Kan. 86 (1991) 815 P.2d 501 WILLIAM GAUGER, Appellant, v. STATE OF KANSAS, STEVEN J. DAVIES, Secretary of Corrections of the State of Kansas, and RAY ROBERTS, Director of the Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, Appellees. No. 65,384 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed July 12, 1991. Blaise R. Plummer, of Carson & Fields, of
McSherry v. City of Long Beachpublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LEONARD MCSHERRY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. No. 06-55837 D.C. No. CITY OF LONG BEACH; LONG BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT; NORMAN CV-02-03767-RGK TURLEY, Officer; CARTHEL S. ORDER AND ROBERSON, in his individual and OPINI
Fred Berre Douglas v. Jeanne S. Woodford, Warden, of Rswl California State Prison at San Quentinpublic domain
OPINION MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge: Fred Douglas, a California death row inmate, appeals from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Because we find that Douglas’s counsel was constitutionally ineffective in failing to investigate and present significant mitigating evidence to the jury, we grant relief as to the penalty phase
United States v. Johnny Williams A/K/A Doctor Johnpublic domain
FLOYD R. GIBSON, Circuit Judge. A jury convicted Johnny Williams of attempting to possess five or more kilograms of cocaine with the intent to distribute. See 21 U.S.C. ■§§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), 846 (1994). The district court 1 sentenced Williams to 121 months imprisonment, followed by five years of s
Tabler v. Wallacepublic domain
LEIBSON, Justice. In these two consolidated cases1 we again take up the issue of the constitutionality of KRS 413.135, the “no action” statute which provides those persons engaged in the “design, planning, supervision, inspection or construction of any improvement to real property” with immunity from suit for damages or injury caused by any deficiency after the expiration of five years following