⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

9 opinions for “Akins v. Worley Catastrophe Response, LLC”

District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2013-02-04 · Published · cited 6× · 921 F. Supp. 2d 593; 2013 WL 438077; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15222
ORDER AND REASONS ON MOTION JOSEPH C. WILKINSON, JR., United States Magistrate Judge. John Akins and 179 other named plaintiffs, individually on and on behalf of all those similarly situated,1 filed this putative collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b). Plaintiffs allege that their former employers, Worley Catastrophe Respon
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2018-01-25 · Published · cited 2× · 285 F. Supp. 3d 980
Henry J. Bemporad, United States Magistrate Judge This Order concerns Plaintiffs' Motion for Conditional Certification (Docket Entry 21) and Plaintiffs' Motion for Approval and Distribution of Notice and for Disclosure of Contact Information (Docket Entry 22). Pretrial matters have been referred to the undersigned for disposition pursuant to
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017-12-14 · Published · cited 0×
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17‐1655 IN RE: JIMMY JOHN’S OVERTIME LITIGATION ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, East
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2018-10-11 · Published · cited 4× · 346 F. Supp. 3d 890
SIM LAKE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Ralph Jordan ("Jordan" or "Plaintiff") brought this action against defendant Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc., ("Helix" or "Defendant") asserting claims for violation of the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 207 and 211
District Court, District of Columbia · 2025-08-28 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NAMIG BAKER, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 22-2765 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINIO
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2015-09-22 · Published · cited 1× · 132 F. Supp. 3d 858; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126786; 2015 WL 5567416
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT MELINDA HARMON, District Judge. Pending before the Court in the above referenced case, seeking compensatory and punitive damages and equitable relief for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”)of 1990, 42 U.S.C. § 12102 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., is a mot
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017-12-14 · Published · cited 11× · 877 F.3d 756
FLAUM, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs-appellants brought this collective and class action lawsuit against Jimmy John’s1 on behalf of all assistant store managers nationwide for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”). Although the vast majority of plaintiffs work in stores owned by franchisees,2 they claim that Jimmy John’s i
District Court, District of Columbia · 2019-06-27 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WILLIAM M. SCHOOLEY, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 17-1376 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, et al., Defendants. ME
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012-07-19 · Published · cited 86× · 880 F. Supp. 2d 801; 2012 WL 2953651; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 100180
OPINION AND ORDER GREGORY L. FROST, District Judge. This matter is before the Court for consideration of Porsche Cars North America, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss the Master Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (ECF No. 62), Plaintiffs’ Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Defendant Porsche Cars North America, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss the Master Consolidated Amend