Cases

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE May 2000 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. AMANDA LEE SUTTON Direct Appeal from the Criminal Court for Hamilton County No. 214146 Stephen M. Bevil, Judge No. E1999-00920-CCA-R3-CD October 2, 2000 The defendant, a former day care wor

446 F.Supp.2d 823 (2006) Doug SUTTON and Prescott Nottingham, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Robert F. BERNARD, Robert T. Clarkson, and Bert B. Young, Defendants. No. 00 C 6676. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 17, 2006. Marvin Alan Miller, Jennifer Winter Sprengel, Matthew Eric Van Tine,

MEMORANDUM DECISION GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND AND SEVERING AND REMANDING CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS JONATHAN SALES, M.D., BAKERSFIELD MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND CATHOLIC HEALTHCARE WEST TO KERN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT (Doc. 11) OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge. Plaintiffs Brian Sutton and Deborah Sutton filed a Complaint for Damages in the Superior Court of California, County

961 S.W.2d 216 (1997) Alan SUTTON, Appellant, v. KATY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, Appellee. No. 01-96-00157-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). January 2, 1997. Rehearing Overruled August 13, 1997. *217 Olney G. Wallis, Richard Ewing, Houston, for Appellant. Merri Schneider-Vogel, Houston,

520 F.3d 1259 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gary Lee SUTTON, Defendant-Appellant. No. 07-1223. United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit. April 3, 2008. *1260 Jill Wichlens, Assistant Federal Public Defender (Raymond P. Moore, Federal Public Defender, oh the briefs), Denver, CO, for Defendants-Appell

446 F.Supp.2d 814 (2006) Doug SUTTON and Prescott Nottingham, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Robert F. BERNARD, Robert T. Clarkson, and Bert B. Young, Defendants. No. 00 C 6676. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 12, 2006. *815

623 N.W.2d 247 (2001) Patrick J. SUTTON, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Respondent, v. VIKING OLDSMOBILE NISSAN, INC., Petitioner. No. C2-99-1843. Supreme Court of Minnesota. February 13, 2001. ORDER By order dated August 22, 2000, consideration of the petition for further review in the above-entitled case was stayed pending

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE ASSIGNED ON BRIEFS TO WESTERN SECTION MARCH 30, 2007 WILLIAM HARRISON NIX, III v. RICHARD TERRY SUTTON Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Wilson County No. 14086 John D. Wooten, Jr., Judge No. M2006-00960-COA-R3-CV - Filed on May 25, 2007 The appellant contends that the circuit court erred in dismissing his

22-2327 Sutton v. Tapscott United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term 2022 Argued: May 10, 2023 Decided: November 4, 2024 No. 22-2327 CARRÉ SUTTON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

264 Ga. 222 (1994) SUTTON v. THE STATE. S94A0238. Supreme Court of Georgia. Decided May 31, 1994. Vansant, Corriere, McClure & Dasher, John M. Vansant, Jr., K. Alan Dasher, for appellant. C. Paul Bowden, District Attorney, Melinda I. Ryals, Assistant District Attorney, Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, Susan V. Boleyn, Senior Assistant Attorn

ORDER PER CURIAM. Defendant appeals following his conviction by a jury of unlawful use of a weapon, § 571.030.1(4). We affirm. We have reviewed the record and find the claims of error are without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons

96 F.Supp.2d 189 (2000) Raymond J. SUTTON, Jr., Plaintiff, v. VILLAGE OF VALLEY STREAM, NEW YORK, James Darcy, Patrick McKenna and Nicholas Camarano, Defendants. No. CV 99-2731. United States District Court, E.D. New York. May 8, 2000. *190 Wolin & Wolin, by Alan E. Wolin, Jericho, New York, for plaintiff. Ryan & B

2020 IL App (1st) 181616 No. 1-18-1616 SECOND DIVISION December 22, 2020 ____________________________________________________________________________ IN THE APPELLATE COURT OF ILLINOIS FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT ____

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 21-0598 (PLF) ) TERENCE SUTTON, ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER On October 21, 2021, the Court directed that all filings related to the United States’ Motion to Disqualify Counsel [Dkt. No. 34] be submitted under seal because resolving that motion “will necessarily require consideration and discussion of GE (Oct. 21, 2021 Memorandum Opinion and Order (““Mem. Op.”) [Dkt. No. 44

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Vv. Criminal No. 21-0598-1 (PLF) TERENCE SUTTON, Defendant. ) OPINION AND ORDER Currently before the Court is the issue of whether the United States must produce to Mr. Sutton certain documents that the United States claims are privileged and has submitted for in camera review pursuant to this Court’s July 1, 2022 opinion: See United States v. Sutton, Crim. No. 21-0598, 2022 WL 2383974, at *10 (D.D.C. J

People v Sutton (2020 NY Slip Op 03400) People v Sutton 2020 NY Slip Op 03400 Decided on June 17, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Scheinkman, J. Published by New York Sta

Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to Illinois Official Reports the accuracy and

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) ) v. ) Criminal No. 21-0598-1 (PLF) ) TERENCE SUTTON, ) ) Defendant.

43 B.R. 250 (1984) In re Rita SUTTON, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 5-84-00338. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut. September 24, 1984. On Motion for Reconsideration October 16, 1984. Joanne S. Faulkner, New Haven Legal Assistance Ass'n, Inc., New Haven, Conn., for debtor. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ALAN H.W. SHIFF, Bankruptcy Judge.<

OPINION Opinion by Justice FITZGERALD. This dispute between siblings Thomas Sutton and Brenda Levetz arises out of a mediated settlement agreement (“MSA”) in this action and a corollary will contest pending in another county. Following a determination that Levetz had capacity to enter the MSA, the trial court signed a final judgment