Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Alejandro Castro”
Alejandro Castro v. Statepublic domain
OPINION Opinion by: MARIALYN BARNARD, Justice. After the trial court denied his motion to suppress, appellant Alejandro Castro pled nolo contendere to two counts of second-degree robbery. 1 The trial court sentenced Castro to five years imprisonment and
Alejandro Castro v. Statepublic domain
Opinion issued July 6, 2006 In The Court of Appeals For The
Alejandro Lopez-Castro v. the State of Texaspublic domain
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-23-00254-CR ALEJANDRO LOPEZ-CASTRO, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee From the 18th District Court Johnson County, Texas Trial Court No. DC-F202200552
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC v. Castropublic domain
SALTER, J.' Nationstar Mortgage appeals an order involuntarily dismissing its residential foreclosure action and an order denying a motion for. rehearing regarding the dismissal. Concluding that the dismissal was an unwarranted and excessive sanction, we reverse. Appellee Alejandro Castro obtained a $352,000 residential mortgage loan as part of his purch
United States v. Castro-Castropublic domain
Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Alejandro Castro-Castro pleaded guilty to a one-count indictment charging him with illegal reentry into the United States following deportation and subsequent to a felony conviction, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), (b)(1) (20
Castro v. Thalerpublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit denied.
Castro v. Thalerpublic domain
Petition for rehearing denied. Former decision, 562 U.S. 1233, 131 S. Ct. 1505, 179 L. Ed. 2d 330, 2011 U.S. LEXIS 1669.
State v. Herrera-Castropublic domain
¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Johnson, Owens, Wiggins and Gordon McCloud, considered at its April 30, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered. ¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED: ¶ 3 That the petition for review is denied. For the Court /s/ Fairhurst, CJ.</
State v. Herrera-Castropublic domain
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Grant County, No. 07-1-00439-7, Kenneth L. Jorgensen, J., entered June 23, 2008. Affirmed by unpublished opinion per Brown, J., concurred in by Sweeney and Korsmo, JJ.
Angeles Castro v. Gonzalespublic domain
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I dissent. Petitioners in this case, Manuel Angeles Castro and Margarita Lopez Flores, were the victims of a “notario” service that contracted with unscrupulous attorneys and cheated Petitioners out of the opportunity to present their case fully. According to Petitioners, they met a person who falsely promised them that they were eligible for permanent residency and who fi
Angeles Castro v. Gonzalespublic domain
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I dissent. Petitioners in this case, Manuel Angeles Castro and Margarita Lopez Flores, were the victims of a “notario” service that contracted with unscrupulous attorneys and cheated Petitioners out of the opportunity to present their case fully. According to Petitioners, they met a person who falsely promised them that they were eligible for permanent residency and who fi
Rodriguez v. Statepublic domain
PER CURIAM. DENIED. See Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004). ALLEN, DAVIS and BROWNING, JJ., concur.
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL ESPECIAL (X) MIGDALIA FORT APELACIÓN procedente del Apelante TA2025AP00117 Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala v. Superior de
Anna Galaza v. Alejandro Mayorkaspublic domain
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ANNA GALAZA, No. 21-15464 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:16-cv- 00878-RFB-DJA v. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS,* OPINION Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Dist
In re: Alejandro G. Carrasco Castillopublic domain
EN EL TRIBUNAL SUPREMO DE PUERTO RICO In re: 2025 TSPR 31 215 DPR ___ Alejandro G. Carrasco Castillo Número del Caso: TS-8,193 Fecha: 26 de marzo de 2025 Representante legal del Sr. Alejandro G. Carrasco Castillo: Lcda. Margarita Carrillo Iturrino Materia: Conducta Profesional – Suspensión permanente e indefinida del ejercicio de la abogacía y la notar
OPINION OF THE COURT ROSENN, Circuit Judge. This appeal raises a number of intricate questions concerning a 1975 “Separation of Properties Agreement” (agreement) executed in Columbia, South America, between the plaintiff and her deceased husband, a 1979 power of attorney from the husband to his son, and the effect of both documents upon the son’s transfe
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL I Apelación procedente del Tribunal de Primera FERNANDO FIGUEROA Instancia, Sala de ALEJANDRO, RENÉ Bayamón FIGUEROA ALEJANDRO,
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL I Apelación procedente del Tribunal de Primera FERNANDO FIGUEROA Instancia, Sala de ALEJANDRO, RENÉ Bayamón FIGUEROA ALEJANDRO,
Castro v. Castropublic domain
Castro v Castro 2026 NY Slip Op 03287 May 27, 2026 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. Alejandro Castro, respondent, v John C. Castro, appellant, et al., defendants. Supreme Court of the State
Castro v. Castropublic domain
Castro v Castro 2026 NY Slip Op 03287 May 27, 2026 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. Alejandro Castro, respondent, v John C. Castro, appellant, et al., defendants. Supreme Court of the State