Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Alejandro De La Cruz Gonzalez Alvarez”
Gonzalez-Camacho v. Banco Popular De P.R.public domain
DANIEL R. DOMÍNGUEZ, United States District Judge Pending before the Court are twelve (1) Motions to Dismiss and one (1) separate Motion to Joinder: (1) Defendant Banco Popular's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint (Docket No. 96); (2) Defendant Scotiabank's Motion to Dismiss under Rules 12(b)(6) (Docket No. 99); (3) Firstbank's Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint (Docket No. 103); (4) Motion to Dismiss F
FOMB v. Cooperativa de Ahorro y Creditopublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1079 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT
ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL I EFRAÍN GONZÁLEZ DROZ APELACION YESSENNIA CANDELARIA y procedente del la Sociedad Legal de Tribunal de Gananciales Primera Instancia, Sala Apelantes
FOMB v. Cooperativa de Ahorro y Creditopublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1119 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT
FOMB v. Cooperativa de Ahorro y Creditopublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1092 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT
FOMB v. Cooperativa de Ahorro y Creditopublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 22-1120 IN RE: THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PUERTO RICO SALES TAX FINANCING CORPORATION, a/k/a Cofina; THE FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO, AS REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT
Gonzalez v. Villarrealpublic domain
251 S.W.3d 763 (2008) Arturo GONZALEZ, Jr. and Esperanza Ochoa, Appellants, v. Domingo VILLARREAL and Elma Garza, Appellees. No. 13-07-00704-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Corpus Christi-Edinburg. February 7, 2008. Rehearing Overruled March 24, 2008. *765 Adam Poncio, Law Offices of Cerda & Poncio, San Antoni
NUMBER 13-07-00704-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Montañez v. State Insurance Fundpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER DANIEL R. DOMINGUEZ, District Judge. Plaintiffs, who are twelve (12) dismissed or demoted employees of the State Insurance Fund (“SIF”), brought the instant action against the SIF and several of its officers. Plaintiffs’ allegations are, inter alia, based on alleged First Amendment Political Discrimination, Fifth and/or Fourteenth Amendment Due Process violations, and Fourteenth
Marrero-Gutierrez v. Molinapublic domain
YOUNG, District Judge. Enid Marrero-Gutierrez (“Marrero”) and Alejandro Bou Santiago (“Bou”) (collectively “the Plaintiffs”) sued Esperanza Molina (“Molina”), Ivan Velez (“Velez”), Luis Coss (“Coss”) a/k/a Tito, Gabriel Al-onso (“Alonso”), Ileana Echegoyen, Nilsa Enid Negron, Ramonita Garcia, and Wanda Roman in their personal capacities; Myrna Crespo-Saavedra in her official capac
United States v. Santiago-Méndezpublic domain
599 F.Supp.2d 95 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. [2] Pascual SANTIAGO-MÉNDEZ, [3] Anthony Domínguez-Cólon [4] Victor Cortes-Cabán [5] Luis Ruperto-Torres, Defendants. Criminal No. 07-346 (DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. January 30, 2009. *100 Scott H. Anderson, United States Attorney's Office, S
In re Rio Piedras Explosion Litigationpublic domain
ORDER CEREZO, District Judge. The Court has before it the Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by the Enron defendants requesting dismissal of Civil Action 98-1519 (docket entry 1550), the opposition filed by plaintiff Integrand Assurance Company (docket entry 1611), and the Enron defendants’ reply (docket entry 1670). The dismissal request is based on the contention that the one year period for filing
Medina v. Adeccopublic domain
(2008) Charlene MEDINA, Plaintiff, v. ADECCO, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 06-2126 (GAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. June 12, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPI, District Judge. Plaintiff Charlene Medina filed this action against Adecco and Popular Finance alleging pregnancy discrimination in violation of Titl
Velazquez Fernandez v. NCE Foods, Inc.public domain
405 F.Supp.2d 179 (2005) Nelson VELÁZQUEZ FERNANDEZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. NCE FOODS, INC., et al., Defendants. No. CIV. 04-2241(JP). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. November 29, 2005. *180 *181 Alicia I. Lavergne-Ramírez, Carlos G. Colón-Machargo, Lavergne Ramírez & Colón M
United States v. Pirespublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 24-1062 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee, v. ADMILSON PIRES, a/k/a Mikey, Defendant, Appellant. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Leo T. Sorokin, U.S. District Judge]
Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder
Torres v. House of Representativespublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPÍ, District Judge. Celia Pagan Torres (“Plaintiff’), filed a complaint against the House of Representatives of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and against Jenniffer Gonzalez Colon, president of the House of Representatives (“Defendant Jenniffer Gonzalez”), Camille Rivera Perez, director of the Office of Advisors to the President of the House of Representatives of
Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.public domain
17-2208, 18-359 Scott v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2018 (Argued: February 13, 2019 Decided: April 1, 2020) Nos. 17-2208-cv, 18-359-cv MAXCIMO SCOTT, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, JAY FRANCIS ENSOR, CHRISTIN
Vaquería Tres Monjitas, Inc. v. Comaspublic domain
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER NUNC PRO TUNC DANIEL R. DOMÍNGUEZ, District Judge. Pending before the Court are: (a) Post-Hearing Memorandum In Support Of The Imposition Of A Specific Remedy As A Result Of Non-Compliance And In Support Of Petition For Contempt filed by Suiza Dairy, Inc. (hereinafter “Suiza’s Post-Hearing Memorandum”), Docket No. 2225; (b) Vaquería Tres Monjitas, Inc.’s Memorandum O
Feliciano-Rodriguez v. United Statespublic domain
JUDGMENT CARMEN CONSUELO CEREZO, District Judge. Having considered the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (D.E. 1) and the Amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C, § 2255 (D.E. 2) filed by petitioner Wilfredo Feliciano-Rod-riguez, the United States’ Response in Op*210position (D.E.