Cases

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo No. 07-20-00170-CR THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLANT V. ALEJANDRO GONZALEZ, APPELLEE On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

OPINION TALLMAN, Circuit Judge: The United States Constitution and federal law require that crimes be prosecuted where the offense was committed. This venue requirement, however, is more easily stated than applied. Determining where an offense occurred can be quite tricky — particularly for continuing crimes, like conspiracy, where the conspirators’ a

Opinion issued December 12, 2024 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-24-00578-CV ——————————— ALEJANDRO GONZALEZ, JEANETTE GONZALES, AND SERGIO INIQUEZ, Appellants V.

NUMBER 13-10-00688-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG CITY OF MISSION, TEXAS, Appellant, v. ALEJANDRO GONZALEZ, Appellee. On appea

PER CURIAM:* Andres Alejandro-Gonzalez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Alejandro-Gonzalez complains that his sentence was improperly enhanced pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) based on a prior conviction. He argues that the sentencing provision is unconstitutional. Alejand

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs December 13, 2005 at Knoxville STATE OF TENNESSEE v. ALEJANDRO GONZALEZ Appeal from the Criminal Court for Davidson County No. 2003-D-3032 Cheryl Blackburn, Judge No. M2005-00756-CCA-R3-CD - Filed February 8, 2006 The defendant, Alejandro Gonzalez, appeals a certifi

<ft.» .^esPo^ OFFICIAfe^i»3f§S N« STATE.-G^f^AS MJ PENALTY FOR;";: -:|«- 02 1M P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION

OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711 OFFlC!AL.pyS!NErSS.: stats^ftexas- '':^P PtTNEY BOWES PENALTY FOR 02 1R $Q0-265 PRIVATE USE Hi u 0002003152 DEC 22 2014 12/15/2014 GONZALEZ, AL

ESTADO LIBRE ASOCIADO DE PUERTO RICO TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL III HÉCTOR S. GONZÁLEZ Apelación, RODRÍGUEZ; EILEEN procedente del Tribunal de RAMOS BÁEZ Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de San Juan Parte Recurrida

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 18-0452 Filed October 24, 2018 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. OMAR ALEJANDRO CONTRERAS-GONZALEZ, Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Woodbury County, Timothy T. Jarman, District Associate Judge. The defendant challenges his sentences for poss

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied.

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 8, 2018 No. 04-18-00497-CV Satbir S. CHHINA, M.D. and Alejandro Gonzalez, Jr., FNP-C, Appellants v. Luz Del Carmen RODRIGUEZ and Victor Velazquez, Individually and as Representative of the Estate

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas October 29, 2018 No. 04-18-00497-CV Satbir S. CHHINA, M.D. and Alejandro Gonzalez, Jr., FNP-C, Appellants v. Luz Del Carmen RODRIGUEZ and Victor Velazquez, Individually and as Representative of the Estate

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT No. 04-18-00497-CV Satbir S. CHHINA, M.D. and Alejandro Gonzalez, Jr., FNP-C, Appellants v. Luz Del Carmen RODRIGUEZ and Victor Velazquez, Individually and as Representatives of

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas August 22, 2018 No. 04-18-00497-CV Satbir S. CHHINA, M.D. and Alejandro Gonzalez, Jr., FNP-C, Appellants v. Luz Del Carmen RODRIGUEZ and Victor Velazquez, Individually and as Representative of the Estate

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-18-00497-CV Satbir S. CHHINA, M.D. and Alejandro Gonzalez, Jr., FNP-C, Appellants v. Luz Del Carmen RODRIGUEZ and Victor Velazquez, Individually and as Representatives of

Opinion PER CURIAM. The petitioner, Alejandro Gonzalez, appeals following the denial of his petition for certification to appeal from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We dismiss the appeal. On October 14, 2005, the petitioner, pursuant to a plea agreement, pleaded guilty to possession of cocaine with intent to sell in violation of G

OPINION AND ORDER GARCIA-GREGORY, District Jhdge. Before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Objections to Magistrate Judge Velez-Rive’s Report and Recommendation. (Docket No. 43). Plaintiffs object to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation that summary judgment be granted in favor of Defendant Alejandro Otero Lopez Hospital (“Defendant” or “Hospital”). Upon de novo review, the Court ADOPTS

350 S.W.3d 356 (2011) Carlo Alejandro GONZALEZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee. No. 09-10-00478-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Beaumont. Submitted July 14, 2011. Decided August 24, 2011. *357 Eric Tayce Bond, Conroe, for appellant. Brett Ligon, Dist. Atty., William J. Delmore III, Asst. Dist. A

REINHARDT, Circuit Judge: Rene Ramos-Rascon and Alejandro Gonzalez-Villegas appeal their convictions for conspiracy to distribute cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), and possession of cocaine with the intent to distribute, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We hold that insufficient evidence exists to support their convictions, and reverse.