Cases

SKOGLUND, J. ¶ 1. In September 2014, defendant was tried and convicted of three felony counts of lewd and lascivious conduct with a child that occurred between June 1, 2004 and June 1, 2006. He appeals his convictions, arguing that the trial court erred in admitting consciousness-of-guilt evidence and then failing to give a limiting instruction on the use of that evidence and that the p

SCALES, J. In this consolidated appeal, Appellant Todd Alexander challenges both (i) his conviction for animal cruelty, and (ii) the trial court’s revocation of his probation based on the animal cruelty conviction. Because the jury’s verdict is supported by competent, substantial evidence of when Alexander committed the crime, we affirm. Gonzalez v. State, 841 So.2d 650, 652 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (jury verdict supported by co

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.

822 F.Supp. 305 (1993) Michael J. PIPPEN, Plaintiff, v. Saundra B. SCALES, James H. Deese, Alton L. Scales, Billy R. Ward, Wiley T. McRae, Jr., Leroy Adams, John H. Fountain Rhym H. Kim, Brian C. Miller, William E. Garrett, Jr., and William T. Tomlinson, Defendants. No. 2:92CV113. United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina, Greensboro Division. May 17, 1993.

SUAREZ, C.J. The Village of Palmetto Bay (the “Village”) appeals a final summary judgment entered in favor of Alexander Schools, Inc. (“Alexander School”) finding Section 10.1 of the Village’s Charter to be unconstitutional. We reverse the trial court’s ruling. We find Section 10.1 is not arbitrary or ambiguous and the record shows that Alexander School failed to meet the high

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (John J. Connell, J.), rendered March 19, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the first degree. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the first degree (Penal Law

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (John J. Connell, J.), rendered March 19, 2010. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the first degree. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the first degree (Penal Law

Shawn Alexander v. State of Maryland, No. 0818 of the September 2023 Term, Opinion by Moylan, J. HEADNOTE: TWO LONG-TERM PROLIFERATIONS – THE BURGLARY COUNTS – THE THEFT-RELATED COUNTS – THE SENTENCING – MOTION TO CORRECT AN ILLEGAL SENTENCE – A VERY DIFFERENT LITIGATIONAL ATMOSPHERE – THE GRANTING OF LEAVE TO FILE A BELATED APPEAL – SUBSECTION 6-205(F): A BIT OF AN ODDITY – THE SAME EVIDENTIARY PREDICATE OR NOT THE SAME? – CONVICTIONS VERSUS GUILTY PLEAS: HISTORIC FACTS VERSUS PRO

[Cite as State v. Alexander, 2025-Ohio-236.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ADAMS COUNTY State of Ohio, : Case No. 23CA1164 Plaintiff-Appellee, : DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY v. : Barry Alexander,

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 765 KA 10-00659 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RODNEY L. SCALES, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. TIMOTHY P. DONAHER, PUBLIC DEFENDER, ROCHESTER (DAVID R. JUERGENS OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. SANDRA DOORLEY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY,

FILED SEP 10 2025 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE Clerk ot the Appellate Courts REc'd By AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs July 1, 2025

[Cite as State v. Alexander, 2022-Ohio-1812.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ADAMS COUNTY State of Ohio, : Case No. 21CA1144 Plaintiff-Appellee, : DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY v. : Barry Alexander,

[Cite as State v. Alexander, 2020-Ohio-1374.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO JUDGES: Hon. John W. Wise, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J. Hon. Ea

THIRD DIVISION DOYLE, P. J., HODGES and WATKINS, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. https://www.gaappeals.us/rules May 9,

21-3075(L) Alexander v. City of Syracuse In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2023 (Argued: October 2, 2023 Decided: March 14, 2025) Docket Nos. 21-3075(L), 22-103(C) * TROY ALEXANDER,

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-63,926-03 EX PARTE GILMAR ALEXANDER GUEVARA, Applicant ON APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS IN CAUSE NO. 847121-C IN THE 180TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT HARRIS COUNTY Per curiam. OPINION This is a subsequent application for a writ of habeas

[Cite as State v. Alexander, 2019-Ohio-3310.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF MEDINA ) STATE OF OHIO C.A. No. 18CA0066-M Appellee v. APPEAL FROM JUDGMENT ENTERED IN THE JENNIFER L. A

Michael P. Shea, U.S.D.J. In this class action, Medicare beneficiaries seek to require the Secretary of Health and Human Services to afford them a hearing to challenge a critical decision made by others when they are hospitalized-whether to admit them as inpatients or whether to place them on "observation status." That decision does not always affect the types of medical services they receive at the hospital, but it can have an enor

Filed 6/25/19 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, A151809 v. BRYAN ALEXANDER, (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. SCN2203

Judge Terri F. Love The State of Louisiana seeks review of the trial court's December 6, 2018 ruling granting defendant's motion to suppress statement. The trial court found that questioning of defendant should have ceased once his cousin, an attorney, informed the police that he was there to serve as defendant's counsel. We find that the right to counsel is invoked by a defendant. Defendant freely and voluntarily s