Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
5 opinions for “Alika Atay v. County of Maui”
Alika Atay v. County of Mauipublic domain
OPINION CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge: The citizens of Maui County voted into law an ordinance banning the cultivation and testing of genetically engineered (GE) plants. We must decide whether the ban is preempted by federal and state law, as the district court held below. We hold that the ordinance is expressly preempted by the Plant Protection Act, 7 U.S.C. § 7
Robert Ito Farm, Inc. v. County of Mauipublic domain
OPINION MURGUIA, Circuit Judge: A magistrate judge may exercise jurisdiction over a civil action “[ujpon the consent of the parties.” 28 U.S.C; § 636(c)(1). This case requires us to decide whether the consent of a prospective intervenor— that is, one who wants to intervene but has not yet been allowed to do so—is necessary, for a magistrate judge to rale
Robert Ito Farm, Inc. v. County of Mauipublic domain
ORDER DETERMINING THAT THE COUNTY OF MAUI GMO ORDINANCE IS PREEMPTED AND EXCEEDS THE COUNTY’S AUTHORITY SUSAN OKI MOLLWAY, Chief Judge. I. INTRODUCTION. Is a County of Maui Ordinance banning genetically engineered (“GE”) activities and/or genetically modified organisms (“GMOs”) preempted by federal and/or state law? Does the Ordinance exceed the County’s authority? Those are the questions
King v. Luteypublic domain
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCEC-XX-XXXXXXX 07-JAN-2025 09:25 AM Dkt. 54 ODMR SCEC-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI _
King v. Luteypublic domain
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCEC-XX-XXXXXXX 24-DEC-2024 12:02 PM Dkt. 50 FFCL SCEC-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE ST