Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Allen Howard Sumner”
Estate of Howard v. Commissionerpublic domain
RYMER, Circuit Judge, dissenting: Despite the fact that the majority reaches a felicitous result, the tax court’s analysis appears literally correct. The statute says that to have a “qualified income interest for life” the surviving spouse must have been “entitled to all the income from the property, payable annually or at more frequent intervals.” § 2056(b)(7)(B)(ii)(I). The tax court read this provision as
Allen v. IBM Corporationpublic domain
* * * * * * * * * * * The undersigned reviewed the prior Opinion and Award, based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Glenn. The appealing party has not shown good ground to reconsider the evidence; receive further evidence; rehear the parties or their representatives; and having reviewed the competent evidence of record, the Full Commission affirms the Opinion and Award of Deputy Commissioner Glenn with minor modifications.
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. Statonpublic domain
Thompson, Justice. We granted certiorari to the Court of Appeals in Staton v. State Farm Auto. Ins. Co., 294 Ga. App. 208 (669 SE2d 164) (2008) and posed this question: Did the Court of Appeals err in concluding that Staton was entitled to stack the uninsured motorist coverage from his employer’s insurance policies which covered vehicles that were not involved in the car accident in which he was injured? See OCGA § 33
State of Tennessee v. Jeffery Allen Bostonpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs May 17, 2011 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JEFFERY ALLEN BOSTON Appeal from the Criminal Court for Sumner County No. 784-2005 Dee David Gay, Judge No. M2010-00919-CCA-R3-CD - Filed October 18, 2011 A Sumner County Criminal Court jury convicted the defendant, Jeffery Allen Boston, of secon
Wissell v. Fletcher Allen Health Care, Inc.public domain
Wissell v. Fletcher Allen Health Care, Inc., No. 232-2-12 Cncv (Grearson, J., May 22, 2014) [The text of this Vermont trial court opinion is unofficial. It has been reformatted from the original. The accuracy of the text and the accompanying data included in the Vermont trial court opinion database is not guaranteed.] STATE OF VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIV
Sumner v. Matapublic domain
449 U.S. 539 (1981) SUMNER, WARDEN v. MATA. No. 79-1601. Supreme Court of United States. Argued December 9, 1980. Decided January 21, 1981. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. *540 Thomas A. Brady, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for petitioner. W
Rodney Clay Evans v. Allen Luebberspublic domain
United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________ No. 03-1900 ___________ Rodney Clay Evans, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the
Schroeder v. Kaplanpublic domain
60 F.3d 834NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Eric SCHROEDER, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Gary KAPLAN, HMSF Residency Section Supervisor; DarylDirecto, prison guard; Robert Johnson, prison guard;William Oku, for
PER CURIAM: The appellants were found guilty by a jury in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia on a single-count indictment charging that they did knowingly and unlawfully possess a quantity of distilled spirits in *272
Estate of Howard v. Commissionerpublic domain
Estate of Rose D. Howard, Deceased, Roger W. A. Howard, Volney E. Howard III, Alanson L. Howard, Robert L. Briner, Trustees, Petitioners v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, RespondentEstate of Howard v. CommissionerDocket No. 9208-87United Sta
McCall v. C.M. Allen Company, Inc.public domain
The Full Commission has reviewed the prior Opinion and Award based upon the record of the proceedings before Deputy Commissioner Dillard and upon the briefs and argument of counsel. The appealing party has shown good ground to reconsider the evidence. The Full Commission reverses the Deputy Commissioner's Opinion and Award and enters the following Opinion and Award. This case was originally heard by Deputy Commissioner Dillard in Lincolnton, North Carolina, on 20 October 1994. Subsequ
BOWMAN, Circuit Judge. Rodney Clay Evans was convicted of first-degree murder in Missouri and was sentenced to life in prison for killing his estranged wife, Sheilah, by drowning her in the family pool. After he exhausted his state appellate and post-conviction remedies, he filed this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) habeas corpus petition by which he sought to have his conviction vacated.
Andrews v. Thermik Corporationpublic domain
The undersigned have reviewed the Award based upon the record of the proceedings before the deputy commissioner. The appealing party has shown good grounds to reconsider the evidence. However, upon much detailed reconsideration of the evidence as a whole, the undersigned reach the same facts and conclusions as those reached by the deputy commissioner, with some minor technical modifications. The Full Commission, in their discretion, have determined that there are no good grounds in thi
Sumner v. Amacherpublic domain
437 P.2d 630 (1968) Floyd SUMNER, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Belinda Christian Sumner, Deceased, Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant and Respondents, v. Albert James AMACHER and Louise R. Rankin, Executrix of the Last Will and Testament of Wellington D. Rankin, Deceased, Defendants and Cross-Claimants and Appellants. No. 11319. Supreme Court of Montana. Submit
108 B.R. 815 (1989) In re COHUTTA MILLS, INC., Debtor. Howard W. JONES, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Cohutta Mills, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, Defendant-Appellee. Civ. A. No. 4:89-CV-56-HLM. United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Rome Division. December 12, 1989. *816 Howard W. Jones, Office
Howard v. Robinsonpublic domain
Shaw, C. J. This is a real action, brought to recover two houses in Boston; and the demandant claims title under an officer’s deed given by Daniel J. Cobum, a deputy-sheriff, upon a warrant directed to him, by which he was required to make sale of the same under a decree, directing the premises to be sold to satisfy a mechanic’s lien on a building contract, pursuant to the Rev. Sts. c. 117. The creditor in the decree was
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. McMahonpublic domain
365 F.Supp.2d 671 (2005) NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. James L. McMAHON, Michael McMahon, and State Farm Automobile Insurance Co., Defendants. No. 5:04-CV-263-H(2). United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Western Division. April 13, 2005. Susan K. Burkhart, Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, Raleigh, NC, for plaintiff. James L. Mc
Painter v. City of MTpublic domain
MURPHY, Judge. BACKGROUND This case arises out of events that took place in 2012, leading to the arrest of Plaintiff, Gregory Painter, by Mt. Holly police. Plaintiff owned property in Mt. Holly that is the site of an auto body shop, which Plaintiff also owned (hereinafter "the property"). Plaintiff leased the property and the business to Defendants Chris and Tracy Small ("the Smalls"), who a
Sutton v. Suttonpublic domain
143 S.W.3d 759 (2004) Carmen Murphy SUTTON, Respondent, v. Luther SUTTON, Appellant. No. WD 63256. Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District. September 21, 2004. *760 Allen S. Russell, Kansas City, MO, for Appellant. Cindy L. Whitton, Southlake, TX, for Respondent. Before VICTOR C. HOWARD, P.J., ROBERT G. ULRICH a
Oakland Raiders v. National Football Leaguepublic domain
61 Cal.Rptr.3d 634 (2007) 41 Cal.4th 624 161 P.3d 151 The OAKLAND RAIDERS, Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant, v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant; Paul Tagliabue et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. S132814. Supreme Court of California. July 2, 2007.