⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Allen v. B & B Keaton, Inc.”

Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001-08-31 · Published · cited 4× · 764 N.E.2d 1043; 145 Ohio App. 3d 796
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 798 DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY This is an appeal from a Pike County Common Pleas Court judgment that denied a Civ.R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment filed by Purchase Plus Buyers Group, Inc., defendant below and appellant herein. The following errors are assigned for our review: FIRST ASSIGNMENT O
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009-12-29 · Published · cited 24× · 591 F.3d 209; 15 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1135; 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 28588; 2009 WL 5125769
591 F.3d 209 (2009) Sanjuanita SEPULVEDA; Angela Salinas; Jose Sanchez Rivera, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated; David Bailey; Sean Bradham; Clara Bennett; Victor Burgos Rivera; Vence Byrd; Hada Cardenas; Angel Colmenares; Yachira Davila; Hector Esmurria; Garvina Gibbs; Margaret Gibbs; Roger Gonzales; Patricia Gutierrez; Selena Hancock; Cesar Hernandez; Pattie Hinton; William Jackson; Thomas Jacobs; Robin Lott; Maricruz Luyando; Maria
In Re Keatonpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1995-06-01 · Published · cited 11× · 182 B.R. 203; 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 758; 1995 WL 338205
182 B.R. 203 (1995) In re Ken D. KEATON, Tonya J. Keaton, Debtors. Bankruptcy No. 94-13206. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee. June 1, 1995. *204 Richard L. Banks, Cleveland, TN, for debtors Ken D. Keaton and Tonya J. Keaton. Herman O. Loewenstein, Nashville, TN, David E. Nelson, Wagner, Nelson & Weeks, Chattanoog
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2015-03-25 · Published · cited 0× · 528 B.R. 289; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37317; 2015 WL 1393643
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE KINGDOM FRESH’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION DAVID ALAN EZRA, Senior District Judge. Before the Court is a Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s February 27, 2015 Escrow Order (“February 27 Order”) filed by Kingdom Fresh Produce, Inc.; I Kunik, Co., Inc.; Rio Bravo Produce, Inc.; GR Produce, Inc.; and Five Brothers Jalisco Produce, Inc. d/b/a Bonanza 2011 (“Kin
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2018-04-10 · Published · cited 0×
04/10/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE March 28, 2018 Session LASCASSAS LAND COMPANY, LLC v. JIMMY E. ALLEN, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Rutherford County No. 15CV-1008 Hamilton V. Gayden, Jr., Judge No. M2017-01400-COA-R3-CV This a
District Court, District of Columbia · 2005-05-13 · Published · cited 0× · 368 F. Supp. 2d 99; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8854; 2005 WL 1140549
368 F.Supp.2d 99 (2005) FRESH KIST PRODUCE, L.L.C., Plaintiff, v. CHOI CORPORATION, INC. d/b/a Washington Wholesale Produce Company et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A.01-1834(JMF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. May 13, 2005. David Allen Adelman, Glen Ellyn, IL, John P. Van Beek, Alexandria, VA, Michael J. Keaton, Palatine, IL, for Plaintiff.
District Court, District of Columbia · 2005-03-03 · Published · cited 11× · 362 F. Supp. 2d 118; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3148; 2005 WL 517907
362 F.Supp.2d 118 (2005) FRESH KIST PRODUCE, L.L.C., Plaintiff, v. CHOI CORPORATION, INC. d/b/a Washington Wholesale Produce Company et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 01-1834(JMF). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 3, 2005. *119 John Philip Van Beek, Young, Goldman & Van Beek, Alexandria, VA, Michael J. K
District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2009-05-06 · Published · cited 2× · 614 F. Supp. 2d 943; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 38984; 106 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 698; 2009 WL 1299574
614 F.Supp.2d 943 (2009) Rex ALLEN, Plaintiff, v. FORT WAYNE FOUNDRY CORP., Defendant. Cause No. 1:08-CV-59. United States District Court, N.D. Indiana, Fort Wayne Division. May 6, 2009. *945 R. Mark Keaton, Keaton & Keaton, Fort Wayne, IN, for Plaintiff. Anthony M. Stites, Jeremy N. Gayed, Barrett & McNagny LLP, F
District Court, District of Columbia · 2003-03-10 · Published · cited 22× · 251 F. Supp. 2d 138; 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3486; 2003 WL 1089300
251 F.Supp.2d 138 (2003) FRESH KIST PRODUCE, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CHOI CORPORATION, INC., d/b/a, Washington Wholesale Produce Company, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 01-1834(RMU). United States District Court, District of Columbia. March 10, 2003. *139 John Philip Van Beek, Young, Goldman & Van Beek, Alexandria, VA, Micha
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas) · 1985-05-23 · Published · cited 27× · 694 S.W.2d 410; 26 Educ. L. Rep. 1298; 1985 Tex. App. LEXIS 6832
ALLEN, Justice. Greenville Independent School District (“GISD”) appeals from a summary judgment rendered in favor of B & J Excavating, Inc. We hold that as a matter of law the summary judgment based on breach of a statutory duty was granted in error; *412therefore, we reverse and render judgment for GISD on that point. Any remaining causes of action are remanded f
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2018-06-12 · Published · cited 10× · 818 S.E.2d 919
Justice Ketchum : *921 When an error occurs during a trial, a basic rule of trial practice is that a party must promptly lodge an objection to the error. By objecting, the party alerts the opposing party and the judge of the error so it may be corrected before the jury renders a verdict. A p
District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988-06-30 · Published · cited 20× · 545 A.2d 1228; 1988 D.C. App. LEXIS 114; 1988 WL 74369
545 A.2d 1228 (1988) Robert L. BALTIMORE, Appellant, v. B.F. GOODRICH COMPANY, Appellee. No. 86-665. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued September 29, 1987. Decided June 30, 1988. *1229 Alan C. Anderson for appellant. *1230 Ronald G. Guziak, Washington, D.C.,
West Virginia Supreme Court · 2018-06-12 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA January 2018 Term _______________ FILED No. 17-0086 June 12, 2018 _______________ released at 3:00 p.m. EDYTHE N
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022-07-07 · Published · cited 4× · 2022 Ohio 2360
[Cite as Twymon v. Eagle Auto Parts, Inc., 2022-Ohio-2360.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA MICKEY TWYMON, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 11o993 v. : EAGLE AUTO PARTS, INC., ET AL., : Defendants-
District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2018-03-31 · Published · cited 0× · 2018 DNH 072
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Thomas Jackson Miller v. Civil No. 16-cv-143-JL Opinion No. 2018 DNH 072 The Sunapee Difference, LLC d/b/a Mount Sunapee Resort MEMORANDUM ORDER The plaintiff in this case, a skier at New Hampshire's Mount Sunapee resort, was injured when he struck a support post for snow making e
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2020-07-14 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE WILLIAM RICHARD KRUSE, ) individually and as TRUSTEE for THE ) VIVIAN CALVERT KRUSE LIVING ) TRUST and THE WILLIAM ) RICHARD KRUSE LIVING TRUST, ) ) Petitioners, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 12392-VCS ) SYNA
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012-06-28 · Published · cited 44× · 682 F.3d 1091; 2012 WL 2428423; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 13214
RILEY, Chief Judge. The district court 1 granted summary judgment to Wescott Agri-Products, Inc. on Wescott’s claim that Sterling State Bank, Inc. (bank) violated the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 1930 (PACA), 7 U.S.C. § 499a et seq., but denied Wescott’s claim for attorney fees and cost
Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941-03-13 · Published · cited 25× · 148 S.W.2d 565; 347 Mo. 721; 1941 Mo. LEXIS 649
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Scott County. The suit is to quiet title to a large tract of land in New Madrid County and was originally brought in that county and the venue changed. [1] Pending here is a motion by respondent to dismiss the appeal for failure to comply with our Rule 13, alleging that appellants' abstract does not set forth so much of the record as is necessary to a complete understanding of all the questions presented. Appellants' abstract contains 309 printed pages.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2006-05-23 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 4, 2006 Session LORINE GOODWIN HINDMAN v. ALLEN MOORE and wife, JACKIE MOORE Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Bradley County No. 02-337 Hon. Jerri S. Bryant, Chancellor No. E2005-01287-COA-R3-CV - FILED MAY 23, 2006 Decedent executed a Power of Attorney document
District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006-07-05 · Published · cited 3× · 436 F. Supp. 2d 967; 65 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 460; 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 46153; 2006 WL 1828720
436 F.Supp.2d 967 (2006) AGRI-SALES, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED POTATO CO., INC., et al., Defendants. No. 05 C 372. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. July 5, 2006. *968 John Steven Delnero, Bell Boyd & Lloyd, Chicago, IL, Katy Lynne Koestner, Meuers Law Firm, P.L., Steven M. Defalco, Attorney at L