Cases

Matter of Williams v New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision (2022 NY Slip Op 07280) Matter of Williams v New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision 2022 NY Slip Op 07280 Decided on December 22, 2022 Appellate Division, Third Department <

MEMORANDUM-DECISION and ORDER LAWRENCE E. KAHN, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION In this employment action, Plaintiff, Sergeant Marie Rother (“Plaintiff’), brings a number of claims arising out of her treatment by supervisors and co-workers while she was employed by Defendant the NYS Department of Corrections and Community Supervision (“DOCCS”). See generally Dkt. No

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Fourth Judicial Department by order of the Supreme Court, Wyoming County [Michael M. Mohun, A.J.], entered January 16, 2017) to review a determination of respondent. The determination found after a tier III hearing that petitioner had violated an inmate rule. It is hereby ordered that th

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued September 19, 2022 Decided April 27, 2023 No. 21-7078 STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL., APPELLANTS v. META PLATFORMS, INC., APPELLEE Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:2

MEMORANDUM & OPINION PAMELA K. CHEN, District Judge: Plaintiff Merlene Bacchus, a former school aide in the New York City public school system, brings this action against the New York City Department of Education (“DOE”), District Council 37 and its affiliate, the Board of Education Employees Local 372 (collectively “Union Defendants” or “Union”), and Renee Pepper (“Pepper”), assistant prin

OPINION OF THE COURT Nicholas Iacovetta, J. The petitioner moves for vacatur of the parole warrant and restoration of the petitioner to parole supervision on the grounds that the Department of Corrections and Community Supervision failed to provide the petitioner with the notice of violation within the three-day statutory time limit, and that the Department failed to provide the petitioner with a preliminary

OPINION O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: We must decide whether a state court decision on a California prisoner’s habeas corpus petition precludes any claims he might have under federal law. I A Ricky Gonzales has been in custody of the California Department of Corrections at Pel

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-KA-00580-COA WILLIAM ALLEN CARPENTER APPELLANT v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/04/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CELESTE EMBREY WILSON COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: DESOTO COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR AP

701 F.Supp.2d 318 (2010) Lisa M. HALL, Plaintiff, v. NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Defendant. No. 06-CV-2908 (KAM)(LB). United States District Court, E.D. New York. March 30, 2010. *321 William Roche, Law Office of William A. Roche, Hicksville, NY, for Plaintiff. Daniel Chiu, Michael A. Cardozo Corporation Co

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE ROBERT J. BRYAN, District Judge. This matter comes before the court on the Report and Recommendation of the magistrate judge. Dkt. 50. The court has reviewed the relevant documents, including plaintiffs objections (Dkt. 53) and the remaining record. On June 19, 2013, U.S. Magistrate Judge Karen L. Strombom issued a Report

OPINION & ORDER RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge: Plaintiffs Angel DeCastro, Susan Calvo, and Kelly Macon bring this putative class action against the City of New York and the New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission (“TLC”), challenging the war-rantless seizure of vehicles they owned or operated under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. Before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions fo

OPINION AND ORDER GABRIEL W. GORENSTEIN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Ernesto Soberanis, currently an inmate in the Watertown Correctional Facility in Watertown, New York, brought this suit pro se under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of New York (“the City”) and the New York State Department of Corree-*397tions and Community Supervision (“DOCC

OPINION Sweet, D.J. Plaintiffs Anika Edrei (“Edrei”), Shay Horse (“Horse”), James Craven (“Craven”), Keegan Stephan (“Stephan”), Michael Nusbaum (“Nusbaum”), and Alexander Appel (“Appel”) (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) have brought the following lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants The City of New York (“NYC”), William Bratton (“Bratton”), John Maguire (“Maguire”), and Mike Po-letto (“Polet

State of New York OPINION Court of Appeals This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. No. 37 Suzan Russell, Appellant, v. New York University, et al., Respondents. Avram S. Turkel, for appellant. Joseph C. O'Keefe, for respondents New York University, et al.

*379MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ANALISA TORRES, District Judge: Plaintiffs, Benjamin Case, Elizabeth Catlin, Jennifer Klein, and Mark Kushneir, bring this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of New York (the “City) and nine individual defendants employed by the New York City Police Department (“NYPD”), alleging that their constitutional righ

08/27/2025 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON July 8, 2025 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. RICKY LEE ALLEN, JR. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. 22-158 Joseph T. Howell, Judge ___________________________________

641 F.Supp.2d 211 (2009) Collette J. SCOTT, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF NEW YORK DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Correction Officers' Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Inc, and Norman Seabrook, Defendants. No. 04 Civ. 9638(SHS). United States District Court, S.D. New York. June 17, 2009. *216 Donnahue G. George, Law Offices of

Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the Atlantic and Maryland Reporters. Users are requested to notify the Clerk of the Court of any formal errors so that corrections may be made before the bound volumes go to press. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-CV-1425 SHERRY ALLEN AND WAYNE ALLEN, APPELLANTS, V. DISTRICT OF COLUMBI

MEMORANDUM & ORDER PAMELA K. CHEN, United States District Judge: Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”). Plaintiff Jill Meyer (“Plaintiff’), a former employee- of Defendants State of New York Office of Mental Health (“OMH”) and Creedmoor Psychiatric Center (“CPC”), applied to, but was not hired for, certain position

Matter of New York State Off. of Mental Health v Marco G. (2018 NY Slip Op 06998) Matter of New York State Off. of Mental Health v Marco G. 2018 NY Slip Op 06998 Decided on October 18, 2018 Appellate Division, First Department