Cases

MEMORANDUM ** A review of the record, appellant’s response to this court’s order to show cause, and appellant’s opening brief, indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.

¶ 1 Marie C. Bouzos-Reilly (Mother) appeals from the trial court's order granting John C. Reilly's (Father) motion to dismiss Mother's custody complaint on the grounds that a New York judge determined that New York was the home state and that Pennsylvania lacked jurisdiction. We find that the Pennsylvania trial judge abused her discretion when she deferred to a New York trial judge's improper determination that New York was the home state of the underlying custody matter. Because the

ORDER CARR, District Judge. This is a breach of contract and environmental contamination case in which Allen County (the County) contends, among other things, that Reilly Industries (Reilly) contaminated its drainage system. Pending is Reilly’s motion to compel against the County. (Doc. 37). For the following reasons, Reilly’s motion shall be denied. BACKGROUND In 1

FIFTH DIVISION MCFADDEN, C. J., MCMILLIAN, P.J., and GOSS, J. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules

OPINION AND ORDER 1 WHEELER, Judge. This bid protest involves the allegations of Plaintiff, Clinton Reilly that he was wrongly excluded from competing for a General Services Administration (“GSA”) building lease in Sacramento, California. The leased space was to house a Military Entrance Processing Station for the Department of Defense. Mr. Reilly has leased hi

349 F.3d 1149 Martin Allen JOHNSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Edward F. REILLY, Jr., Chairman, U.S. Parole Commission; John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United States; Jim Spinden, Sheriff, WashingtonCounty, Oregon; Dan Noelle, Sheriff, Multnomah County, Oregon; Pat Detloff, Sheriff, Clackamas County, Oregon, Defendants-Appellees. No. 01-36033. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Cir

WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge: Johnson appeals from the decision of the district court denying his petitions for a writ of mandamus to the United States Parole Commission (Commission), for ha-beas corpus, and for declaratory relief. The district court assumed jurisdiction over this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. 28 U.S.C. § 1291 provides us with jurisdiction to the extent that the district court denied Johnson’s reques

CONCURRING OPINION BY Judge BROBSON. I must reluctantly concur with the majority’s resolution of this appeal. I write separately in strong support of Judge Le-adbetter’s concurring opinion, with which I join. Respectfully, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s majority decision in In re Opening a Private Road (O’Reilly), 607 Pa. 280, 5 A.3d 246 (2010) (O’Reilly II), imposes

OPINION BY President Judge LEADBETTER. This case, on remand from our Supreme Court, involves a challenge to the constitutionality of the Private Road Act (PRA).1 *294This case began when Timothy P. O’Reilly filed a Petition for the Appointment of a Board of Viewers pursuant to the PRA, for the purpose of creating a private

PER CURIAM: Plaintiff-Appellee David Allen participated in several demonstrations throughout the City of Houston that led to his detention and arrest by police officers, including Defendants-Appellants Aaron Cisneros and Juan Montelongo. Allen brought claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Sergeant Cisneros and Officer Montelongo, among others, alleging that the officers violated

On July 27, 1892, the city of Henrietta commenced in the District Court of Clay County its suit against J. G. Eustis, executor of the will of Wm. Eustis, deceased, to recover a sum claimed to be due to it by the estate of said Wm. Eustis, deceased, as taxes on lot 9, in block 4, in said city, and other property belonging to said estate. It seems that other parties against whom the city claimed a right to a recovery for sums due as taxes were made parties defendant in the suit. The cause was r

[Cite as State v. Reilly, 2020-Ohio-850.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT SENECA COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, CASE NO. 13-19-28 v. LOUIS A. REILLY, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. Appeal from Seneca County Common Pleas Court

OPINION BY Judge PELLEGRINI. Though the “Private Road Act”1 was first enacted in colonial times, Hickory on the Green Homeowners Association, along with its 124 constituent property owners (collectively, “Association”) contends that the Private Road Act is an unconstitutional taking of property for a private purpose in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitu

*228Pfeifer, J., dissenting. {¶ 51} This is the Supreme Court, and when the opportunity arises, we should answer the questions that Ohioans need answered. In this case, we are asked whether mothers who breast-feed can be fired from then- jobs for pumping their breasts in the workplace. That is, in its protect

5 A.3d 246 (2010) In the Matter of OPENING a PRIVATE ROAD FOR the BENEFIT OF Timothy P. O'REILLY Over Lands of (A) Hickory on the Green Homeowners Association, and (B) Mary Lou Sorbara; Gregory E. Burgunder; Ann E. Cain; Don E. Cottrill & Norma J. Cottrill, H/W; Joseph K. Cupples; Bart V. Delcimmuto; James D. Dragoo & Linda J. Dragoo, H/W; Kimberly M. Fonzi; Brian J. Gallagher & Diane J. Gallagher, H/W; Dolores M. Gembarosky; Michael J. Grali

HOWARD, Circuit Judge. Edward Paulding appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See Paulding v. Allen, 303 F.Supp.2d 26 (D.Mass.2004). Paulding was convicted by a Massachusetts jury of felony murder in the first degree and is currently serving a life sentence. At Paulding’s state court trial, the judge instructe

HOWARD, Circuit Judge. Petitioner Russell Horton, a Massachusetts state prisoner convicted of two first-degree murders, appeals from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. We affirm. I. Factual Background In June 1998, a jury convicted Horton of committing two first-degree murders and an assault with the intent to

McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge: BACKGROUND In January 1994, NatWest, an investment bank, hired Michael T. Reilly to help *259develop its fledgling underwriting business. The parties entered into an express contract guaranteeing Reilly’s employment for 1994 and 1995 under the following terms. For 1994, Reilly would receive a base salary of $200,000 plus

In an action, inter alia, pursuant to RPAPL article 15 to determine claims to certain real property, and for injunctive relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by her notice of appeal and brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Gazzillo, J.), entered October 23, 2013, as denied those branches of her motion which were for summary judgment, in effect, declaring that the plaintiffs do

By the Court, Leonard, J.: It appears from uncontradicted allegations of the complaint in this action, that on the third day of May, 1875, the defendant, for a valuable consideration, at Hamilton, in this state, executed and delivered to plaintiff his certain promissory note in writing, by which he then and there promised, one day after date, to pay plaintiff the sum of one thousand five hundred dollars, gold