Cases

315 F.Supp.2d 992 (2004) KENNEDY & COMPANY, INC.; and The Weitz Company, LLC, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 90, Defendant. No. 4:02-CV-40521. United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division. April 26, 2004. *993 *994 Kelly R. Baier, Bradley

Opinion by Judge N.R. SMITH; Dissent by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, Jr. *1112OPINION N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judge: To avoid interruptions to interstate commerce, the Railway Labor Act treats labor relations in the national transportation industry differently from more generally applicable labor law. Section 152 First of the Railway Lab

ADKINS, J. This negligence case, brought under the Federal Employers Liability Act (“FELA”), presents several issues not found in a typical negligence claim, but of growing significance nationwide. The issue that has been drawing most of the courts’ time and attention is federal preclusion — whether and when a railroad employee’s negligence action under FELA may be *436

OPINION OF THE COURT SLOVITER, Chief Judge. This appeal presents the issue of the appropriate procedure to be used by the district court when it concludes that there were fundamental procedural irregularities in the course of an arbitration hearing between parties to a collective bargaining agreement. I.

165 F.Supp.2d 647 (2001) Diane BREDESEN, Plaintiff, v. DETROIT FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS, LOCAL NO. 5, AFFILIATED WITH THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS, Defendant. No. 00-CV-71630-DT. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. September 28, 2001. *648 Barbara M. Harvey, Detroit, MI, for plaintiff. Th

Filed: 11/17/2015 4:35:15 PM Eloy R. Garcia, District Clerk Starr County, Texas Ana Martinez

50 B.R. 203 (1985) In re CAREY TRANSPORTATION, INC., Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 85 B 10460. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York. June 14, 1985. *204 Shea & Gould, New York City, for debtor; Stuart Hirshfield, Richard Czaja, New York City, of counsel. O'Connor & Mangan, Long Island City, N.Y., for Local Union 807; J.

265 F.3d 787 (9th Cir. 2001) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,v.UTILITY WORKERS UNION OF AMERICA, LOCAL 132, AFL-CIO, DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. No. 98-56842 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Argued and Submitted March 6, 2001Filed September 7, 2001 [Copyrighted Material Omitted]

139 F.Supp.2d 976 (2001) TEAMSTERS & EMPLOYERS WELFARE TRUST OF ILLINOIS, Plaintiff, v. GORMAN BROTHERS READY MIX, Defendant. No. 99-3059. United States District Court, C.D. Illinois, Springfield Division. April 17, 2001. *977 Patrick J. O'Hara, Cavanagh & O'Hara, Springfield, IL, for Plaintiff. Lee W. Barron, Alto

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT INTERNATIONAL UNION OF No. 23-124 OPERATING ENGINEERS, NLRB No. STATIONARY ENGINEERS, 20-CA-270047 LOCAL 39, OPINION Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, ---------------------------------

BREYER, Circuit Judge. This case raises two difficult and important sets of questions concerning collective bargaining and rapid transit. First, can the Commonwealth of Massachusetts enact statutes that are inconsistent with assurances that its Transit Authority previously gave the Secretary of Labor as part of an application for federal grant money? Second, do those Massachusetts statutes unconstitutionally impair pre-existin

666 F.2d 618 109 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2014 LOCAL DIVISION 589, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, AFL-CIO, CLC,Plaintiff, Appellant,v.The COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, et al., Defendants, Appellees.LOCAL DIVISION 589, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, AFL-CIO, etal., Plaintiffs, Appellees,v.The COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, et al., Defendants, Appellants.LOCAL DIVISION 589, AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, AFL-CI

259 F.Supp.2d 356 (2003) UNITED STATES of America, v. UNION CORP.; Metal Bank of America; Irvin G. Schorsch, Jr.; and John B. Schorsch. v. CONSOLIDATED EDISON CO. OF NEW YORK; Public Service Electric & Gas Co. of New Jersey; and Monsanto Co. No. CIV.A. 80-1589. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. January 21, 2003.

McMahon, C.J.: Following a bench trial, the Court, for its findings of fact, conclusions of law, and verdict: Findings of Fact on Liability I.The Parties 1. Plaintiffs in Moore v. Navillus Tile, Inc., No. 14 Civ. 8326 (“the Moore Action”), are Trustees of four different groups of multi-employer fringe benefit funds. 2. Pl

897 F.2d 999 133 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2812, 58 USLW 2587,114 Lab.Cas. P 12,021 Richard P. BARTHELEMY; Edison L. Denney, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.AIR LINES PILOTS ASSOCIATION; Association TWA MasterExecutive Council; Henry Duffy; Harry Hoglander;Does 1 through 50, inclusive et al.,Defendants-Appellees. No. 88-15180. United States Court of Appeals

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT INTERNATIONAL UNION OF No. 23-124 OPERATING ENGINEERS, NLRB No. STATIONARY ENGINEERS, 20-CA-270047 LOCAL 39, ORDER AND Petitioner, AMENDED v. OPINION NATIONAL LABOR RELAT

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER SPATT, District Judge. The Plaintiffs commenced this action on January 27, 2011, seeking to recover from *254the Defendants, jointly and severally, unpaid contributions owed to the Plaintiff Funds, pursuant to Sections 502(a)(3) and 515 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), as amended, 29

399 F.3d 248 INTERFAITH COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION; Lawrence Baker; Martha Webb Herring; Margaret Webb; Rev. Winston Clarke; Margarita Navas,v.HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. formerly known as Alliedsignal, Inc.; Roned Realty of Jersey City, Inc.; Roned Realty of Union City, Inc; W.R. Grace & Company; Ecarg, Inc; W.R. Grace, Ltd.W.R. Grace & Company; Ecarg, Inc; W.R. Grace, Ltd., Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs,v.Heller-Jers

280 F.3d 669 ARMCO, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee,v.UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Local 169, United Steelworkers of America, AFL-CIO, Billy D. Collins, Dan Martin, and Mark E. Robertson, Defendants-Appellants,v.City of Mansfield, Lydia Reid, and John Fuller, Defendants-Appellees. No. 00-3609. No. 00-3610. No. 00-3611. United

341 B.R. 693 (2006) In re MESABA AVIATION, INC., dba Mesaba Airlines, Debtor. No. BKY 05-39258. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota. May 18, 2006. *694 *695 *696 *697 *698