Cases

646 So.2d 981 (1994) Bruce STEVENS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. HARTFORD INSURANCE COMPANY OF THE MIDWEST, et al., Defendants-Appellants. No. 94-523. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. November 2, 1994. Rehearing Denied January 18, 1995. *982 Carol James Aymond Jr., Bunkie, for Bruce Stevens. Kay Hilg

994 F.Supp. 970 (1998) NEW ENGLAND MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE CO., Plaintiff, v. BANK OF ILLINOIS IN DUPAGE, et al., Defendants. No. 96 C 4090. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. February 20, 1998. *971 *972 David Joseph Novotny, Janice L. Cleary, Peterson & Ross, Ch

951 So.2d 486 (2007) John POMIER v. Robert MORELAND, et al. No. 2006-1117. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit. February 7, 2007. David Groner, David Groner, P.L.C., New Iberia, Louisiana, for Plaintiff/Appellant, John Pomier. Skylar J. Comeaux, Joseph H. Garbarino, Jeff R. Rytlewski, Law Offices of Jeff R. Rytlewski, Lafayette, Louisiana, for Defenda

720 F.Supp.2d 862 (2010) Ernest DURMISHI, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant. Case No. 09-11061. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. June 30, 2010. *863 Kujtim Sulolli, Gerald H. Acker, Goodman Acker, Southfield, MI, for Plaintiff. William F. Rivard, Harvey Kruse, Troy, MI, for D

AMENDED OPINION (amending DE 200) KEVIN MCNULTY, United States District Judge *215Dr. Richard A. Kaul, an anesthesiologist by training, claims to be a minimally invasive spine surgeon. In March 2014, the New Jersey State Board of Medical Examiners (the "Board") said otherwise. Because his performance of spine surgeries on 11 patients wit

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Robert M. Dow, Jr., United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant Board of Education of the City of Chicago’s motion for summary judgment [99]. For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s motion [99] is granted. I. Background The Court takes the relevant facts from the parties’ Local Rule 56.1 statements: (1) Defendant’s

14 So.3d 311 (2008) J. Robert WOOLEY, As Commissioner of Insurance for the State of Louisiana v. Thomas S. LUCKSINGER, Michael D. Nadler, Stephen J. Nazarenus, Scott Westbrook, Michael K. Jhin, William F. Galtney, John P. Mudd, Executive Risk Indemnity, Inc., Executive Risk Management Associates, Executive Risk Specialty Insurance Co., Executive Liability Underwriters and Greenwich Insurance Co., AmCareco, Inc., AmCare Management, Inc. J. Rob

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JULIE A. ROBINSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE A jury rendered a verdict in favor of Plaintiff Martha Fox on claims for damages arising under Title VII and Title IX against Defendant Pittsburg State University (“PSU”), and the Court entered judgment on the verdict. The parties have now filed post-trial motions.1 The motions are fully briefed and the Cour

690 F.Supp.2d 850 (2010) Kathleen S. STIPE, Plaintiff, v. Eric K. SHINSEKI, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, Defendant. Case No. 4:06CV1692SNLJ. United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division. February 18, 2010. *854 Kathleen S. Stipe, Madison, IL, pro se. Stephen S. Davis, Office of U.S. Attorney, St. Louis,

488 F.Supp.2d 1157 (2007) Gloria HUNTER and Jessica Hunter, Plaintiffs, v. THE BUCKLE, INC. et al., Defendants. No. 06-2056-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. May 29, 2007. *1158 *1159 *1160 James D. Bowers, Keith S. Rhodes, Taylor Fields, Fields

785 F.Supp.2d 1188 (2011) Richard OBENAUF, Plaintiff, v. FRONTIER FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., Defendants. No. Civ. 11-0085 JB/KBM. United States District Court, D. New Mexico. May 19, 2011. *1190 Rob Treinen, Treinen Law Office, Albuquerque, NM, for Plaintiff. *1191 AMENDED MEMO

262 F.Supp.2d 1004 (2003) FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION, Plaintiff, v. LAW ENGINEERING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC., Defendant. No. CIV. 02-4283 (DSD/FL). United States District Court, D. Minnesota. May 21, 2003. *1005 Robert J. Huber, Esq. and Leonard, Street and Deinard, Minneapolis, William R. Wildman, Esq., George

255 F.Supp.2d 1217 (2003) Cathy PARSELLS, Plaintiff, v. MANHATTAN RADIOLOGY GROUP, L.L.P., Frank C. Lyons, Michael Sheffield, Gregory J. Welle and William Volkmann, II, Defendants. No. 02-2008-JWL. United States District Court, D. Kansas. April 3, 2003. *1221 Deena Hyson Bailey, Martin, Pringle, Oliver, Wallace & Bauer, LLP,

*1006ORDER DOTY, District Judge. This matter is before the court upon plaintiff Florida State Board of Administration’s (“FSBA”) motion for partial summary judgment on defendant Law Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.’s (“Law”) affirmative defenses of (1) improper venue, (2) statute of limitations, (3) economic loss doctrine, (4) no fiduc

[Regarding Application of the Court's Prior Rulings on Manifestation, Incidental Damages (Lost Time), and Unjust Enrichment to All Remaining Jurisdictions in Dispute (MDL Order No. 131 Issues) ] JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge INTRODUCTION... 274 LEGAL STANDARDS... 275 DISCUSSION... 275 A. Manifestation... 276

ACCEPTED 13-14-00725-cv THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS 7/23/2

ACCEPTED 03-14-00510-CV 4243321 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS

ACCEPTED 01-15-00571-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 9/24/2015 9:45:33 PM CHRIST