Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Alston v. Select Garages LLC”
Alston v. Town of Brooklinepublic domain
George A. O'Toole, Jr., United States District Judge The magistrate judge to whom this case was referred issued two reports and recommendations ("the R & Rs") (dkt. nos. 188 & 189) addressing the motions to dismiss filed by the Town of Brookline defendants (dkt. no. 110) and the individual defendants (dkt. no. 112), respectively. The R & Rs recommend that paragraphs of the third amended complaint be stricken as surplusag
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS OCEANIC TIME WARNER CABLE, LLC AND TIME WARNER CABLE, INC.’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT REGARDING INVALIDITY OF UÍS. PATENT NO. 7,631,336 Alan C- Kay Sr,, United States District Judge ■ ... For the reasons set forth’ below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PÁRT Defendants Oceanic Time Warner Cable, LLC and Time Warner Cable, Inc.’s Motion for
In Re Olde Prairie Block Owner, LLCpublic domain
447 B.R. 578 (2011) In re OLDE PRAIRIE BLOCK OWNER, LLC, Debtor. No. 10 B 22668. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 31, 2011. *579 John Ruskusky, George R. Mesires, Niles N. Park, Patrick F. Ross, Ungaretti & Harris LLP, Chicago, IL, Neil E. Holmen, Walker Wilcox Matousek LLP, Chicago, IL, Michael
Rangel v. Vega-Ortizpublic domain
AMY, Judge. |, This matter concerns an automobile accident that resulted in the death of Cesar Medina. Individually and on behalf of Mr. Medina’s three minor children, Mr. Medina’s wife filed suit against the driver of the other vehicle, the insurer of the other vehicle, and the insurer of Mr. Medina’s vehicle. The insurer of Mr. Medina’s vehicle filed a motion for summary judgment on the basis that their policy did not in
McGee v. Allstate Ins. Co.public domain
GARRETT, J. *1163The plaintiff, Easter McGee, appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of the defendant, Allstate Insurance Company ("Allstate"), that dismissed her uninsured/underinsured motorist ("UM") claim against Allstate. Allstate answers the appeal, claims that McGee's appeal is frivolous, and requests an award of costs and at
Does v. Millspublic domain
United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit No. 21-1826 JANE DOES 1-6; JOHN DOES 1-3; JACK DOES 1-1000; JOAN DOES 1- 1000, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. JANET T. MILLS, in her official capacity as Governor of the State of Maine; JEANNE M. LAMBREW, in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Maine Department of Health and Human Services; NIRAV D. SHAH, in his
DUNSTON, Judge MEMORANDUM OPINION (June 19, 2017) Pending before the Court are Defendants TK Holdings, Inc.’s and Takata Corporation’s Motions to Dismiss the Complaint, or in the Alternative, for a Stay. Defendants’ motions will be denied in part because the Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants under the Virgin Islands long-arm statute and the Complaint states a claim f
Syed v. Statepublic domain
Panel: Woodward, C.J., Wright, Graeff, JJ. * Woodward, C.J. *191 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. BACKGROUND ...196 A. Trial...196
22-1589-cv Revitalizing Auto Communities Environmental Response Trust v. National Grid USA In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2022 (Argued: February 23, 2023 Decided: February 5, 2024) No. 22-1589-cv
Lee v. Andochickpublic domain
957 A.2d 1038 (2008) 182 Md. App. 268 Keith A. LEE v. Lori L. ANDOCHICK. No. 2598, Sept. Term, 2006. Court of Special Appeals of Maryland. October 3, 2008. *1040 Jerrold A. Thrope (Sheila K. Sachs, Gordon, Feinblatt, Rothman, Hoffberger & Hollander, LLC, on brief), Baltimore, for Appellant. Vinc
652 F.3d 584 (2011) JEFFERSON BLOCK 24 OIL & GAS, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ASPEN INSURANCE UK LIMITED; Ace European Group Limited; Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, London, subscribing to Policy 07835N6717, Defendants-Appellees. No. 10-30190. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. August 29, 2011. *587 Robert E.
Gordon v. Amadeus IT Group, S.A.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: Plaintiffs filed the instant class action on behalf of consumers who have purchased airline tickets from nine major air carriers during the past ten years. The Amended Complaint alleges that Defendants, a group of global distribution systems through which airlines provide fare and schedule information to travel agents, conspired to restrain competition
State v. C. G.public domain
2022 WI 60 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2018AP2205 COMPLETE TITLE: In the interest of C. G., a person under the age of 18: State of Wisconsin, Petitioner-Respondent, v. C. G., Respondent-Appellant-Petitioner.
State v. C. G.public domain
2022 WI 60 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2018AP2205 COMPLETE TITLE: In the interest of C. G., a person under the age of 18: State of Wisconsin, Petitioner-Respondent, v. C. G., Respondent-Appellant-Petitioner.
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN RE VOLKSWAGEN “CLEAN No. 18-15937 DIESEL” MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS D.C. No. LIABILITY LITIGATION, 3:15-md-02672- CRB THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION COMMISSION OF HILLSBOROUGH OPINION COUNTY, Florida; SALT LAKE COUNTY, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
Kaye v. Orange Regional Medical Centerpublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER KENNETH M. KARAS, District Judge. Gerald Kaye (“Plaintiff’), individually and on behalf of a purported class action, brings this suit against his employer, Orange Regional Medical Center (“Defendant”), alleging that Defendant failed to pay him and other, current and former nonexempt respiratory therapists for work they performed during rest periods and meal breaks. Plaintiff c
Carris v. First Student, Inc.public domain
DECISION and ORDER GLENN T. SUDDABY, Chief Judge. Currently before the Court, in this pro se employment discrimination action filed by Margo Carris (“Plaintiff’) against First Student, Inc. (“Defendant”) are the following motions: (1) Plaintiffs motion for leave to file and serve an Amended Complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(2) (Dkt. No. 25); and (2) Defendant’s cross-motion to d
GNC Franchising, Inc. v. O'BRIENpublic domain
443 F.Supp.2d 737 (2006) GNC FRANCHISING, INC. Plaintiff, v. Tim O'BRIEN, Dorothy O'Brien, and Biscayne Nutritional Services, Inc., Defendants. No. Civ.A. 05-0270. United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania. July 5, 2006. *738 Gordon W. Schmidt, Kevin S. Batik, Amy Kerr Parker, McGuire Woods, Robert W. Pritchard, Littler Men
In re Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, & Products Liability Litigationpublic domain
Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motions to Exclude Expert Testimony (“Daubert Motions”) Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Toyota’s Motion for Summary Judgment JAMES V. SELNA, District Judge. Table of Contents PART ONE: THE MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE.....................................1064 I. Introduction — The
ACCEPTED 13-15-00167-CV FILED THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS IN THE 13TH COURT OF APPEALS