⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Aluminum Shapes, L.L.C. - Adversary Proceeding”

Supreme Court of Iowa · 2016-06-24 · Published · cited 48× · 881 N.W.2d 433; 2016 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 77
WATERMAN, Justice. This wrongful-death action arises from a fatal fall from an apartment balcony and presents several issues on the applicability of the doctrine of negligence per se to an alleged municipal housing code violation. The thirty-two-inch high balcony railing complied with the local housing code when the apartment complex was constructed in 1968, but unless exempted
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2017-09-26 · Published · cited 6× · 576 B.R. 325
MEMORANDUM OPINION REGARDING FIXTURE CLASSIFICATION AND VALUATION MARTIN GLENN, UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction... 339 A. Fixtures .. .340 B. Valuation.. .341 II. Background.. .342
Supreme Court of the United States · 2015-01-20 · Published · cited 636× · 135 S. Ct. 831; 113 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1269; 90 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1244; 83 U.S.L.W. 4055; 190 L. Ed. 2d 719; 2015 U.S. LEXIS 628
Justice BREYERdelivered the opinion of the Court. In Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc.,517 U.S. 370, 116 S.Ct. 1384,
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2019-04-22 · Published · cited 1× · 602 B.R. 645
John P. Gustafson, United States Bankruptcy Judge This case is before the court on Trustee John Lane's ("Trustee") Amended Objection to Claim Number 8 ("Objection"). [Doc. # 474]. Claimant Ohio Department of Taxation ("ODT") filed a Response that incorporates its responses to Trustee's original Objection. [Doc. ## 489, 262, 269]. After a trial on the Objection was held on September 24 and 25, 2018, Trustee and ODT filed post-trial b
District Court, S.D. New York · 1941-10-25 · Published · cited 13× · 44 F. Supp. 97
44 F.Supp. 97 (1941) UNITED STATES v. ALUMINUM CO. OF AMERICA et al. Eq. No. 85-73. District Court, S. D. New York. September 30, October 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, 1941. *98 *99 *100 *101
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2016-01-12 · Published · cited 3× · 543 B.R. 365
DECISION AFTER TRIAL •CARLA E. CRAIG, Chief United States Bankruptcy Judge In this proceeding, which was removed by the debtors to this Court from Supreme Court, New York County, Citibank, N.A. (“Citibank” or Plaintiff’), the principal creditor of the debtors, seeks to collect amounts owed to it from Evgeny Freidman (“Freidman” or “Defendant”), guarantor of the debtors’ obligations. This motion
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2014-08-12 · Published · cited 1× · 514 B.R. 720; 2014 WL 3954221; 2014 Bankr. LEXIS 3450
CHAPTER 11 OPINION ROSEMARY GAMBARDELLA, BANKRUPTCY JUDGE MatteR Before the Court Before the Court is Consolidated Debtor G-I Holdings, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss the *724New York City Housing Authority’s Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief. A hearing was conducted on the matter on February 2
District Court, D. Connecticut · 2018-12-18 · Published · cited 5× · 352 F. Supp. 3d 164
VICTOR A. BOLDEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY ... 169 II. FINDINGS OF FACT: THE PARTIES AND THE PRODUCTS ... 170 A. The Parties ... 170 B. Robert Haddock's Background in the Metal Roofing Industry ... 171 C. Robert Haddock's Inventions ... 172 D. The '629 Patent... 177
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2024-06-18 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE VIVINT SOLAR, INC., a Delaware ) corporation, ) ) Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0988-PAF ) JIM LUNDBERG, ) ) Defe
Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2024-05-30 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE VIVINT SOLAR, INC., a Delaware ) corporation, ) ) Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2020-0988-PAF ) JIM LUNDBERG, ) ) Defe
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2015-08-12 · Published · cited 2× · 120 F. Supp. 3d 509; 81 ERC (BNA) 1519; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 105694
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ROBERT C. CHAMBERS, Chief Judge. This suit concerns allegations that Defendant Fola . Coal Company, LLC,. has violated the narrative water quality standards of three separate permits for discharges from three mines into tributaries of-Leatherwood Creek. On June 1-4, 20Í5, the Court held a bench trial regard*512ing juris
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015-08-25 · Published · cited 0× · 183 A.3d 289; 453 N.J. Super. 588
*598I. Introduction, Statement of Facts, and Procedural History "Nearly any consent decree can be viewed simultaneously as 'a crackdown or a sellout.' " United States v. Telluride Co., 849 F.Supp. 1400, 1402 (D. Colo.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000-07-10 · Published · cited 69× · 218 F.3d 310; 54 Fed. R. Serv. 547; 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15849; 2000 WL 929704
218 F.3d 310 (4th Cir. 2000) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.MICHAEL SEVANE RHYNES, Defendant-Appellant.UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.MICHAEL SEVANE RHYNES, Defendant-Appellant. No. 97-4466 No. 97-4640 (CR-96-6-V). UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS, FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. Argued: April 4, 2000.Decided: July 10, 2000.
District Court, D. Delaware · 1976-11-16 · Published · cited 12× · 424 F. Supp. 700; 192 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 687; 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12268
424 F.Supp. 700 (1976) W. L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC., Plaintiff, v. OAK MATERIALS GROUP, INC., Defendant. Civ. A. No. 75-180. United States District Court, D. Delaware. November 16, 1976. *701 E. A. Uebler of W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc., Newark, Del., for plaintiff; C. Walter Mortenson, Wilmington, Del., Marcus B. Finne
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020-02-04 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA18-714 Filed: 4 February 2020 Davidson County, Nos. 16 CRS 21–24 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MOLLY MARTENS CORBETT and THOMAS MICHAEL MARTENS Appeal by defendants from judgments entered 9 August 2017 and order entered 4 December 2017 by Judge W. David Lee in Davidson County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 31 January 2019.
United States Court of Federal Claims · 2002-08-30 · Published · cited 0× · 53 Fed. Cl. 737; 2002 U.S. Claims LEXIS 260; 2002 WL 31261717
*739OPINION HORN, Judge. BACKGROUND Congress has established a special retirement system for federal law enforcement officers (LEOs), granting Law Enforcement Officers entitlement to an annuity at a younger age and with fewer years of service than other federal employees. 5 U.S.C. § 8336(c)(1) (2000). In addition to the special reti
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2020-02-04 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NORTH CAROLINA No. COA18-714 Filed: 4 February 2020 Davidson County, Nos. 16 CRS 21–24 STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA v. MOLLY MARTENS CORBETT and THOMAS MICHAEL MARTENS Appeal by defendants from judgments entered 9 August 2017 and order entered 4 December 2017 by Judge W. David Lee in Davidson County Superior Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 31 January 2019.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000-07-21 · Published · cited 0×
Filed: July 21, 2000 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT Nos. 97-4466(L) (CR-96-6-V) United States of America, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus Michael Sevane Rhynes, Defendant - Appellant.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001-12-04 · Published · cited 327× · 274 F.3d 337; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 25916; 2001 WL 1529624
BOGGS, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which SILER, J., joined. DAUGHTREY, J. (p. 376), delivered a separate opinion concurring in the judgment. OPINION BOGGS, Circuit Judge. Petitioner-appellant Robert A. Buell appeals the judgment of the district court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U
Trademark Trial and Appeal Board · 2017-10-18 · Published · cited 0×
This Opinion is a Precedent of the TTAB Mailed: October 18, 2017 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ Poly-America, L.P. v. Illi