Cases

ORDER Fernando Martinez Alvarez, a citizen of Mexico, challenges the Board of Immigration Appeals’s conclusion that his due process rights were not violated at his removal hearing before an immigration judge. Martinez Alvarez maintained that the IJ erred by not advising him of his right to apply for asylum, withholding of removal, or protection under the Convention Against Torture. But the IJ was not required to advise him of possible f

MEMORANDUM ** Natanael Barrios-Alvarez, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, protection, under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”), and cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review

Petition for review denied by published opinion. Judge THACKER wrote the opinion, in which Judge DIAZ and Judge FLOYD joined. THACKER, Circuit Judge: Gabriel Santos Alvarez (“Petitioner”) seeks review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision finding him ineligible for cancellation of removal. The BIA reached this conclusion after determining that

Judicial review of all questions of law and fact, including interpretation and application of constitutional and statutory provisions, arising from any action taken or proceeding brought to remove an alien from the United States under this subchapter shall be available only in judicial review of a final order under this section. Except as otherwise provided in this section, no court shall have jurisdiction, by habeas corpus under section 2241 of Ti

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. Ernesto Ortiz-Álvarez pled guilty, under a plea agreement, to illegal possession of a machine gun and to being a felon in possession of three firearms and ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (o) and (g). The district court sentenc

KATZMANN, Circuit Judge: Two now-separated parents dispute whether courts in the United States or the United Kingdom should decide who has custody of their five-year-old child. 1 To resolve this case we must address two questions of first impression for this Court regarding the interpretation of Article 12 of the Hague Conv

LYNCH, Chief Judge. These two appeals arise out of similar lawsuits in which plaintiffs, current and previous employees of the Puerto Rico State Insurance Fund Corporation (SIFC), have alleged that defendants, the SIFC and its high-level administrators, selectively enforced Puerto Rico’s merit principle against them. This “selective enforcement” is said to be in violation of the

OPINION WALLACE, Circuit Judge: Petitioners Juan Carlos Ramirez-Munoz and Maria Beatriz' Adriana Francia-Alva-rez petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (Board) decision to deny the motion to reopen their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and deferral of removal under the Convention Against Torture (CAT)!

541 F.3d 8 (2008) UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Angel GARCÍA-ÁLVAREZ, Defendant, Appellant. Nos. 07-1471, 07-1697. United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit. Heard March 7, 2008. Decided September 4, 2008. *11 Joannie Plaza-Martínez, Assistant Federal Public Defender, with whom Joseph C. Laws, Jr., F

PER CURIAM. Defendant-appellant Nicholas AlvarezEnciso appeals from his sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegal re-entry to the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. §§ 1826(a) and 1326(b)(2). 1 Appellant does not challenge the district court’s calculation of the advisory guideline sentencing range (GSR), bu

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. Defendant Henry Alvarez-Cuevas challenges the propriety of the application of the Sentencing Guidelines in his case and requests a remand for resentencing in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, — U.S. -, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). Although Alvarez-Cuevas did not preserve his Booker

PER CURIAM.* Guillermo Hernandez-Alvarez appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea conviction of being found in the United States after deportation/removal in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Hernandez-Alvarez contends that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) define separate offenses. He argues that the prior conviction that resulted in his increased sentence is an element of a sepa

ORDER OF COURT The panel of judges that rendered the decision in this case having voted to deny the petition for rehearing and the suggestion for the holding of a rehearing en banc having been carefully considered by the judges of the Court in regular active service and a majority of said judges not having voted to order that the appeal be reheard by the Court en banc, It is ordered that the petition for rehearing and

United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit Nos. 24-1112, 24-1260 JOSE RENE ALVAREZ MENDOZA, Petitioner, v. PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, Respondent. PETITIONS FOR REVIEW OF ORDERS OF THE BOARD OF IMMIGRATION APPEALS

KRAVITCH, Senior Circuit Judge. Victor Gonzalez-Alvarez, a Puerto Rican dairy farmer, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to adulterate milk, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, and causing the delivery of adulterated food into interstate commerce, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 331(a), 333(a)(2) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. This appeal by the government of the sentence imposed presents the questions

22-6021 Alvarez v. Garland In the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit AUGUST TERM 2021 No. 22-6021 CARLOS ANIBAL ALVAREZ, Petitioner, v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. ______

Lynch, J. All six defendants were convicted of cocaine trafficking in violation of G. L. c. 94C, § 32E (b) (1994 ed.), and possession of cocaine with intent to distribute in violation of G. L. c. 94C, § 32A (1994 ed.);2 all filed timely notices of appeal. They assert, inter alla, that a judge in the Superior Court erred in denying their motions to suppress evidence seized during the executio

413 Mass. 224 (1992) 596 N.E.2d 325 COMMONWEALTH vs. ANGELO B. ALVAREZ. Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Bristol. May 6, 1992. July 24, 1992. Present: LIACOS, C.J., WILKINS, ABRAMS, LYNCH, & GREANEY, JJ. Benjamin H. Keehn, Committee for Public Counsel Services, for the defendant. Cynthia A. Vincent, Ass

928 F.Supp. 734 (1996) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Michael ALVAREZ, Defendant. No. 96 CR 87-3. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois Eastern Division. May 24, 1996. *735 George Patrick Lynch, Downers Grove, IL, for defendant. Canella Elizabeth Henrichs, United States Attorney's Office, Chicago, IL, for pl

FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT April 14, 2021 _________________________________